A mechanical model of the secondary endings of mammalian muscle spindles

SummaryA mechano-electric model of the secondary endings of the mammalian muscle spindle receptors has been developed. The model involves a mechanical system with second order transfer dynamics connected to a zero order mechano-electric transducer with constant gain.The mechanical system is supposed to describe the viscoelastic properties of the intrafusal muscle fibres, and this part of the model is identical to that used in connection with an earlier proposed model of the primary endings (Rudjord, 1970).The general transfer properties of the model are derived, together with a description of the particular response components obtained during a linear extension of the mechanical system.A simple direct electronic analogue was used for studying the effects of the individual parameters and for a preliminary estimate of an adequate set of parameter values.With appropriate parameter values, a close correspondence could be obtained between the behaviour of the model and the typical response properties of the secondary endings of the muscle spindles.The order of magnitude of the best parameter fit also appeared to correspond to the values previously found to yield an adequate description of the transfer properties of the primary endings.It is further shown that for the best fit of the mechanical parameters, the secondary ending model may be approximated by a simple first order system with lead-lag transfer behaviour.The transfer properties of this simplified model appear to agree with the reported response properties of typical secondary ending receptors except for extreme rates of stretch or very high vibrational frequencies of stretch during which the simplifying approximation evidently does not apply.

[1]  J. Jansen,et al.  FUSIMOTOR ACTIVITY IN THE SPINAL CAT. , 1965, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  R. Poppele,et al.  Quantitative description of linear behavior of mammalian muscle spindles. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  P. Matthews MUSCLE SPINDLES AND THEIR MOTOR CONTROL. , 1964, Physiological reviews.

[4]  P. Matthews,et al.  The central control of the dynamic response of muscle spindle receptors , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  E. Eldred,et al.  Bibliography on muscle receptors; their morphology, pathology and physiology. , 1967, Experimental neurology.

[6]  I. A. Boyd The structure and innervation of the nuclear bag muscle fibre system and the nuclear chain muscle fibre system in mammalian muscle spindles , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[7]  A. Crowe A mechanical model of muscle and its application to the intrafusal fibres of the mammalian muscle spindle. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  R. Granit,et al.  Supraspinal control of the muscle spindles and its significance , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[10]  P. Matthews,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  P. Matthews,et al.  The response of de‐efferented muscle spindle receptors to stretching at different velocities , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J C Houk,et al.  A model of adaptation in amphibian spindle receptors. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Changes in the discharge from a muscle spindle produced by electrotonus in the sensory nerve , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  P. Matthews,et al.  After‐effects of fusimotor stimulation on the response of muscle spindle primary afferent endings , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  T. Rudjord A second order mechanical model of muscle spindle primary endings , 1970, Kybernetik.

[16]  P. Matthews,et al.  The response of de‐efferented muscle spindle endings in the cat's soleus to slow extension of the muscle , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  K. Toyama An analysis of impulse discharges from the spindle receptor. , 1966, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[18]  G. Vossius Das System der Augenbewegung , 2004, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[19]  Brown Mc,et al.  After‐effects of fusimotor stimulation on the response of muscle spindle primary afferent endings , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  R. Stein,et al.  Differences in Variability of Discharge Frequency between Primary and Secondary Muscle Spindle Afferent Endings of the Cat , 1965, Nature.

[21]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The effect of stimulation of intrafusal muscle fibres on sensitivity to stretch of extraocular muscle spindles. , 1959, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[22]  O. Lippold,et al.  Electrical and mechanical factors in the adaptation of a mammalian muscle spindle , 1960, The Journal of physiology.