Feasibility of automatic marker detection with an a-Si flat-panel imager.

Here we study automatic detection of implanted gold markers relative to the field boundary in portal images for on-line position verification. Portal images containing 1-2 MU were taken with an amorphous silicon flat-panel imager. The images were obtained with lateral field at 18 MV. Both the detection success rate and the localization accuracy of markers of 1.0 and 1.2 mm diameter were determined with the help of a marker detection method based on a marker extraction kernel. A method for determining a fiducial reference point related to the field boundary was developed. Detection success rates were 0.99, 0.90 and 0.95 for markers of 1.2 mm diameter and 5 mm length, 1.0 mm diameter and 5 mm length and 1.0 mm diameter and 10 mm length respectively. The localization accuracy appeared to be better than 0.3 mm. The reference point could be reproduced with an accuracy equal to 1 pixel (0.5 mm at isocentre) within one fraction. During the first few seconds of a treatment fraction the field edge was not stable, which appeared to be an effect of the motion of the radiation source. Thanks to the use an a-Si flat-panel imager, on-line position verification using implanted gold markers becomes clinically feasible. We can use a clinically acceptable marker diameter as small as 1.0 mm. These markers can be automatically detected in portal images obtained with 1-2 MU relative to a stable reference point related to the field boundary.

[1]  P. Munro,et al.  X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays. , 1998, Medical physics.

[2]  T. Schultheiss,et al.  A heuristic approach to edge detection in on-line portal imaging. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  K. Eilertsen,et al.  Methods for fully automated verification of patient set-up in external beam radiotherapy with polygon shaped fields. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J Yorkston,et al.  Initial performance evaluation of an indirect-detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) prototype for megavoltage imaging. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M van Herk,et al.  Radiation field edge detection in portal images. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic on-line inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images. , 1993, Medical physics.

[7]  J Pouliot,et al.  Electronic portal imaging device detection of radioopaque markers for the evaluation of prostate position during megavoltage irradiation: a clinical study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  P Hofman,et al.  Detection of fiducial gold markers for automatic on-line megavoltage position verification using a marker extraction kernel (MEK). , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  K. Leszczynski,et al.  The enhancement of radiotherapy verification images by an automated edge detection technique. , 1992, Medical physics.

[11]  Georgi Gluhchev,et al.  Fast algorithm for radiation field edge detection , 1993 .

[12]  D Verellen,et al.  Automatic on-line electronic portal image analysis with a wavelet-based edge detector. , 2000, Medical physics.

[13]  J. Crook,et al.  Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by fiducial markers. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  J Yorkston,et al.  Megavoltage imaging with a large-area, flat-panel, amorphous silicon imager. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Detective quantum efficiency of an amorphous selenium detector to megavoltage radiation. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  G T Chen,et al.  Implementation of three dimensional conformal radiation therapy: prospects, opportunities, and challenges. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  K L Lam,et al.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  P. Bergström,et al.  High-precision conformal radiotherapy (HPCRT) of prostate cancer--a new technique for exact positioning of the prostate at the time of treatment. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  P. Munro,et al.  A review of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). , 1992, Medical physics.

[20]  D Jaffray,et al.  Prototype amorphous silicon array based radiotherapy portal imager , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[21]  K. Lam,et al.  Relative dosimetry using active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) technology. , 1999, Medical physics.

[22]  B. Fallone,et al.  A robust morphological algorithm for automatic radiation field extraction and correlation of portal images. , 1994, Medical physics.