Control of hepatocyte function on collagen foams: sizing matrix pores toward selective induction of 2-D and 3-D cellular morphogenesis.

While microporous biopolymer matrices are being widely tested as cell culture substrates in hepatic tissue engineering, the microstructural basis for their control of cell differentiation is not well understood. In this paper, we studied the role of void size of collagen foams in directing the induction of liver-specific differentiated morphology and secretory activities of cultured rat hepatocytes. Hepatocytes cultured on collagen foams with subcellular sized pore diameters of 10 microm assumed a compact, cuboidal cell morphology, rapidly achieving monolayer coverage, and secreted albumin at the rate of 40 +/- 8 pg/cell/d. Increasing the pore size to 18 microm elicited a distinctly spread cellular phenotype, with discontinuous surface coverage, and albumin secretion rates declined precipitiously to 3.6 +/- 0.8 pg/cell/d. However, when collagen foams with an even higher average void size of 82 microm were used, hepatocytes exhibited high degree of spreading within an extensive three-dimensional cellular network, and exhibited high albumin secretory activity (26 +/- 0.6 pg/cell/d). The effect of void geometry on cellular ultrastructral polarity was further analyzed for the three void size configurations employed. The distribution of the cell-cell adhesion protein, E-cadherin, was primarily restricted to cell-cell contacts on the 10 microm foams, but was found to be depolarized to all membrane regions in cells cultured on the 18 and 82 microm foams. Vinculin-enriched focal adhesions were found to be peripherally clustered on cells cultured on 10 microm foams, but were found to redistribute to the entire ventral surface of cells cultured on the 18 and 82 microm foams. Overall, we demonstrate the significance of designing pore sizes of highly adhesive substrates like collagen toward selective cell morphogenesis in 2-D or 3-D. Subcellular and supercellular ranges of pore size promote hepatocellular differentiation by limiting 2-D cell spreading or effecting 3-D intercellular contacts, while intermediate range of pore sizes repress differentiation by promoting 2-D cell spreading.

[1]  B. Dalton,et al.  Modulation of corneal epithelial stratification by polymer surface topography. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Effect of collagen gel configuration on the cytoskeleton in cultured rat hepatocytes. , 1993, Experimental cell research.

[3]  I. Yannas,et al.  Design of an artificial skin. II. Control of chemical composition. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  A. Awaya,et al.  Peripheral nerve regeneration in a silicone tube: effect of collagen sponge prosthesis, laminin, and pyrimidine compound administration. , 1996, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[5]  M L Yarmush,et al.  Cell-cell interactions are essential for maintenance of hepatocyte function in collagen gel but not on matrigel. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  A novel approach for toxicity sensing using hepatocytes on a collagen-patterned plate , 1993 .

[7]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Role of β1 Integrin Distribution in Morphology and Function of Collagen-Sandwiched Hepatocytes , 1997 .

[8]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Engineering cell shape and function. , 1994, Science.

[9]  D. Bissell,et al.  Interactions of rat hepatocytes with type IV collagen, fibronectin and laminin matrices. Distinct matrix-controlled modes of attachment and spreading. , 1986, European journal of cell biology.

[10]  W. Saltzman,et al.  Growth versus Function in the Three‐Dimensional Culture of Single and Aggregated Hepatocytes within Collagen Gels , 1993, Biotechnology progress.

[11]  F. Silver,et al.  Fibroblast-collagen sponge interactions and the spatial deposition of newly synthesized collagen fibers in vitro and in vivo. , 1984, Scanning electron microscopy.

[12]  D. Ingber EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX, CELLULAR MECHANICS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING , 1993 .

[13]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  G. Michalopoulos,et al.  Primary culture of parenchymal liver cells on collagen membranes. Morphological and biochemical observations. , 1975, Experimental cell research.

[15]  A. Ben-Ze'ev,et al.  Cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions differentially regulate the expression of hepatic and cytoskeletal genes in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  G. Michalopoulos,et al.  Ultrastructure of adult rat hepatocytes cultured on floating collagen membranes. , 1978, Cancer research.

[17]  M L Yarmush,et al.  Culture matrix configuration and composition in the maintenance of hepatocyte polarity and function. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[18]  C B Sledge,et al.  Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behaviour of seeded canine chondrocytes. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[19]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Surface topography can interfere with epithelial tissue migration. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Long‐Term in Vitro Function of Adult Hepatocytes in a Collagen Sandwich Configuration , 1991, Biotechnology progress.

[21]  E. Schuetz,et al.  Hepatocellular phenotype in Vitro is influenced by biophysical features of the collagenous substratum , 1991, Hepatology.

[22]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Micropatterned Surfaces for Control of Cell Shape, Position, and Function , 1998, Biotechnology progress.

[23]  P. Moghe,et al.  Polymer substrate topography actively regulates the multicellular organization and liver-specific functions of cultured hepatocytes. , 1999, Tissue engineering.

[24]  A. Martinez‐Hernandez The hepatic extracellular matrix. I. Electron immunohistochemical studies in normal rat liver. , 1984, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[25]  N. Dagalakis,et al.  Design of an artificial skin. Part III. Control of pore structure. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  M. Toner,et al.  Effect of extracellular matrix topology on cell structure, function, and physiological responsiveness: hepatocytes cultured in a sandwich configuration , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[27]  G. Schoeters,et al.  Haemopoietic long‐term bone marrow cultures from adult mice show osteogenic capacity in vitro on 3–dimensional collagen sponges , 1992, Cell proliferation.

[28]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Assessment of Artificial Liver Support Technology , 1992, Cell transplantation.

[29]  R Langer,et al.  Selective cell transplantation using bioabsorbable artificial polymers as matrices. , 1988, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[30]  I. Yannas,et al.  Design of an artificial skin. I. Basic design principles. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[31]  P. Moghe Soft-Tissue Analogue Design and Tissue Engineering of Liver , 1996 .

[32]  K. J. Long,et al.  Surface roughness, porosity, and texture as modifiers of cellular adhesion. , 1996, Tissue engineering.

[33]  J. Ontko,et al.  Reciprocal effects of energy utilization on palmitate oxidation and esterification in hepatocytes of fed rats. , 1985, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[34]  R. Tompkins,et al.  Hepatocyte function and extracellular matrix geometry: long‐term culture in a sandwich configuration , 1989, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.