Human-centered Design of an Interactive Industrial Robot System Through Participative Simulations: Application to a Pyrotechnic Tank Cleaning Workstation

— Industrials are starting to deploy collaborative robots as new solutions to improve workstations. In particular workstations where human operators may get injured because of repetitive tasks, bad postures or heavy loads are targeted. Collaborative robots can also be an alternative to robots which may take up too much floor space with their safeguards or are not flexible and smart enough to handle complex operations. The introduction of such interactive systems on industrial workstations must satisfy the following requirements: ergonomics and safety of the system, quality and performance of operations, and human well-being. We propose a human-centered approach to improve the introduction of collaborative robots in the industry. Several industrial applications are studied within Safran and Airbus Safran Launchers. In this paper, we present the first application of our work on a pyrotechnic tank cleaning workstation. Our approach is illustrated with the design of a solution through several simulation steps involving the workstation's operators. In particular, the current design of a prototype based on a teleoperated robot is introduced.

[1]  Won Jee Chung,et al.  Optimal mechanism design of in-pipe cleaning robot , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[2]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey , 2008, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Philippe Fuchs,et al.  Assessing the acceptability of human-robot co-presence on assembly lines: A comparison between actual situations and their virtual reality counterparts , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[4]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[5]  Guy A. Boy,et al.  Orchestrating Human-Centered Design , 2012 .

[6]  François Daniellou,et al.  Design projects as opportunities for the development of activities , 2014 .

[7]  Claude Andriot,et al.  Imposing motion constraints to a force reflecting telerobot through real-time simulation of a virtual mechanism , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[9]  Philippe Bidaud,et al.  Human-oriented design of collaborative robots , 2017 .

[10]  François Daniellou,et al.  Simulating future work activity is not only a way of improving workstation design , 2007 .

[11]  Xiaoli Xu,et al.  Research on the oil tank sludge cleaning robot system , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering.

[12]  Young-Ho Choi,et al.  SMART WINDORO V1.0: Smart window cleaning robot , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI).

[13]  Joe Harrington Industrial Cleaning Technology , 2001 .

[14]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Mechanical analogies in hybrid position/force control , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  J. E. Colgate,et al.  Cobots: Robots for Collaboration With Human Operators , 1996, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[16]  Surya P. N. Singh,et al.  V-REP: A versatile and scalable robot simulation framework , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Anirudh Kaushik,et al.  A Technological Survey on Autonomous Home Cleaning Robots , 2014 .

[18]  Jean-Marc Salotti,et al.  Human Factors Issues for the Design of a Cobotic System , 2017 .