In vivo oxidation contributes to delamination but not pitting in polyethylene components for total knee arthroplasty.

The aim of this study was to better understand how in vivo oxidation contributes to fatigue damage in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 119 tibial inserts were consecutively collected after revision surgery. Of the 119 polyethylene retrievals, 29 were gamma sterilized in air (historical), whereas the remaining 90 were gamma sterilized in nitrogen (conventional). Surface damage assessment and characterization of oxidation were performed on all the retrievals. Delamination was significantly more prevalent and extensive in the longer-term, highly oxidized, historical tibial inserts. Pitting damage, in contrast, seemed to be equally prevalent between both retrieval groups and was not correlated with in vivo oxidation. Our findings support our hypothesis that in vivo oxidation is a contributing factor to delamination, but not pitting, in TKA. Despite the lower oxidation displayed by conventional retrievals, this study provides strong evidence that delamination secondary to in vivo oxidation may occur during the second decade of implantation.

[1]  S. Affatato,et al.  The performance of gamma- and EtO-sterilised UHWMPE acetabular cups tested under severe simulator conditions. Part 1: role of the third-body wear process. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[2]  K. Saum,et al.  Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the knee. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Francis E. Kennedy,et al.  Contact Fatigue Failure of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Bearing Components of Knee Prostheses , 2000 .

[4]  Gerard A Engh,et al.  Rapid Polyethylene Failure of Unicondylar Tibial Components Sterilized with Gamma Irradiation in Air and Implanted After a Long Shelf Life , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  Harry A McKellop,et al.  The lexicon of polyethylene wear in artificial joints. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[6]  J. Currier,et al.  In Vivo Oxidation of γ-Barrier–Sterilized Ultra–High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Bearings , 2007 .

[7]  G. Finerman,et al.  Catastrophic Wear of Tibial Polyethylene Inserts , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  J. Currier,et al.  Evaluation of oxidation and fatigue damage of retrieved crossfire polyethylene acetabular cups. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  J. Currier,et al.  Effect of fabrication method and resin type on performance of tibial bearings. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  W. Harris,et al.  Effect of consolidation on adhesive and abrasive wear of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[11]  F. Shen,et al.  Potential errors in FTIR measurement of oxidation in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene implants. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  Javad Parvizi,et al.  Gamma inert sterilization: a solution to polyethylene oxidation? , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  In vitro simulation of contact fatigue damage found in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene components of knee prostheses , 1998, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  V. Goldberg,et al.  Effect of Resin Type and Manufacturing Method on Wear of Polyethylene Tibial Components , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  V. Goldberg,et al.  2006 Otto Aufranc Award Paper: significance of in vivo degradation for polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  C. J. Bell,et al.  Effect of oxidation on delamination of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene tibial components. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  G Lewis,et al.  Polyethylene wear in total hip and knee arthroplasties. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  J. Bryant,et al.  Surface degradation features and microstructural properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPe) , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[19]  L Ryd,et al.  Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  A H Burstein,et al.  Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. , 1983, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Surface Damage in Machined Ram-Extruded and Net-Shape Molded Retrieved Polyethylene Tibial Inserts of Total Knee Replacements , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  T. Wright,et al.  Post-irradiation aging of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  V. Goldberg,et al.  In vivo degradation of polyethylene liners after gamma sterilization in air. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  R. Wasielewski.  The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  R. E. Jensen,et al.  The correlation between fusion defects and damage in tibial polyethylene bearings. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  F. Kennedy,et al.  Oxidation of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene and Its Influence on Contact Fatigue and Pitting of Knee Bearings , 2003 .

[27]  J. Bohl,et al.  The Coventry Award. The effects of shelf life on clinical outcome for gamma sterilized polyethylene tibial components. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  V. Goldberg,et al.  Backside Wear of Miller-Galante I and Insall-Burstein II Tibial Inserts , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  C. J. Bell,et al.  i) Wear of polyethylene in artificial knee joints , 2001 .

[30]  D. Bartel,et al.  The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  Markus A Wimmer,et al.  Clinical performance of contemporary tibial polyethylene components. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  Jocelyn M. Cottrell,et al.  PFC Knee Replacement: Osteolytic Failures From Extreme Polyethylene Degradation , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  S. Kurtz,et al.  On the assessment of oxidative and microstructural changes after in vivo degradation of historical UHMWPE knee components by means of vibrational spectroscopies and nanoindentation. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[34]  T. Brown,et al.  What design factors influence wear behavior at the bearing surfaces in total joint replacements? , 2008, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[35]  M A Ritter,et al.  Direct Compression Molded Polyethylene for Total Hip and Knee Replacements , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  C. Engh,et al.  Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Review Article: Osteolysis After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2007 .

[38]  J. Currier,et al.  Shelf Life and In Vivo Duration; Impacts on Performance of Tibial Bearings , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  Wear performance of 1900 direct compression molded, 1020 direct compression molded, and 1020 sheet compression molded UHMWPE under knee simulator testing , 2007 .

[40]  R. D. Paxson,et al.  Effects of Sterilization on Wear in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  M. Mcdonald,et al.  Distinguishing wear and creep in clinically retrieved polyethylene inserts. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[42]  T. McGloughlin,et al.  Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total knee prostheses: A review of key influences , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.