Topometry optimization of sheet metal structures for crashworthiness design using hybrid cellular automata

by Chandan K. Mozumder The objective in crashworthiness design is to generate plastically deformable energy absorbing structures which can satisfy the prescribed force-displacement (FD) response. The FD behavior determines the reaction force, displacement and the internal energy that the structure should withstand. However, attempts to include this requirement in structural optimization problems remain scarce. The existing commercial optimization tools utilize models under static loading conditions because of the complexities associated with dynamic/impact loading. Due to the complexity of a crash event and the consequent time required to numerically analyze the dynamic response of the structure, classical methods (i.e., gradient-based and direct) are not well developed to solve this undertaking. This work presents an approach under the framework of the hybrid cellular automaton (HCA) method to solve the above challenge. The HCA method has been successfully applied to nonlinear transient topology optimization for crashworthiness design. In this work, the HCA algorithm has been utilized to develop an efficient methodology for synthesizing shell-based sheet metal structures with optimal material thickness distribution under a dynamic loading event using topometry optimization. This method utilizes the cellular automata (CA) computing paradigm Chandan K. Mozumder and nonlinear transient finite element analysis (FEA) via ls-dyna. In this method, a set field variables is driven to their target states by changing a convenient set of design variables (e.g., thickness). These rules operate locally in cells within a lattice that only know local conditions. The field variables associated with the cells are driven to a setpoint to obtain the desired structure. This methodology is used to design for structures with controlled energy absorption with specified buckling zones. The peak reaction force and the maximum displacement are also constrained to meet the desired safety level according to passenger safety regulations. Design for prescribed FD response by minimizing the error between the actual response and desired FD curve is implemented. With the use of HCA rules, manufacturability constraints (e.g., rolling) and structures which can be manufactured by special techniques, such as, tailor-welded blanks (TWB), have also been implemented. This methodology is applied to shock-absorbing structural components for passengers in a crashing vehicle. These results are compared to previous designs showing the benefits of the method introduced in this work.

[1]  V. Venkayya.  Optimality criteria: A basis for multidisciplinary design optimization , 1989 .

[2]  K. Svanberg.  The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[3]  Claus B. W. Pedersen,et al.  Topology optimization design of crushed 2D-frames for desired energy absorption history , 2003 .

[4]  Ciro A. Soto,et al.  Structural topology optimization: from minimizing compliance to maximizing energy absorption , 2001 .

[5]  Gyung-Jin Park,et al.  A review of optimization of structures subjected to transient loads , 2006 .

[6]  Claus B. W. Pedersen,et al.  Crashworthiness design of transient frame structures using topology optimization , 2004 .

[7]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  Continuum-type optimality criteria methods for large finite element systems with a displacement constraint. Part I , 1989 .

[8]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Crashworthiness Design Using Topology Optimization , 2009 .

[9]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Homotopy methods for constraint relaxation in unilevel reliability based design optimization , 2004 .

[10]  Takashi Ebisugi,et al.  Study of optimal structure design method for dynamic nonlinear problem , 1998 .

[11]  Ciro A. Soto,et al.  Structural topology optimization for crashworthiness , 2004 .

[12]  G. I. N. Rozvany,et al.  Continuum-type optimality criteria methods for large finite element systems with a displacement constraint. Part II , 1989 .

[13]  Chandan Mozumder,et al.  Cost and Mass Optimization for Crashworthiness Design of Shell-based Structure using Hybrid Cellular Automata , 2009 .

[14]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Synthesis of a Dynamically Loaded Structure with Topology Optimization , 2009 .

[15]  Surya N. Patnaik,et al.  Optimality of a fully stressed design , 1998 .

[16]  Hongman Kim,et al.  Statistical Modeling of Simulation Errors and Their Reduction via Response Surface Techniques , 2001 .

[17]  G. K. Ananthasuresh,et al.  On an optimal property of compliant topologies , 2000 .

[18]  Anders Klarbring,et al.  Topology optimization of frame structures with flexible joints , 2003 .

[19]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization - Part I: One-material structures , 2001 .

[20]  John E. Renaud,et al.  An Investigation of Reliability-based Topology Optimization , 2006 .

[21]  Ciro A. Soto.  Structural Topology Design Optimization for Controlled Crash Behavior , 2003, DAC 2003.

[22]  E. Salajegheh,et al.  New Approximation Method for Stress Constraints in Structural Synthesis , 1989 .

[23]  L. Schmit,et al.  Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis , 1976 .

[24]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Toward the topology design of mechanisms that exhibit snap-through behavior , 2004 .

[25]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Topology Synthesis of Extrusion-Based Nonlinear Transient Designs , 2009 .

[26]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Topology Optimization Using a Hybrid Cellular Automaton Method With Local Control Rules , 2006 .

[27]  Juan Pablo Leiva,et al.  Topometry Optimization: A New Capability to Perform Element by Element Sizing Optimization of Structures , 2004 .

[28]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[29]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Bone Structure Adaptation as a Cellular Automaton Optimization Process , 2004 .

[30]  Samy Missoum.  Controlling structural failure modes during an impact in the presence of uncertainties , 2007 .

[31]  Arthur W. Burks,et al.  Essays on cellular automata , 1970 .

[32]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  APPLICATION OF TOPOLOGICAL OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES TO STRUCTURAL CRASHWORTHINESS , 1996 .

[33]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Fundamentals of Computer-Aided Engineering , 2003 .

[34]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[35]  Chandan Mozumder,et al.  Thickness based Topology Optimization for Crashworthiness Design using Hybrid Cellular Automata , 2008 .

[36]  Kwon-Hee Lee,et al.  Automotive door design with the ULSAB concept. using structural optimization , 2002 .

[37]  G. Rozvany.  Topology optimization in structural mechanics , 2001 .

[38]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Crashworthiness Design Using a Hybrid Cellular Automaton Algorithm , 2006, DAC 2006.

[39]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  A New Kind of Science , 2003, Artificial Life.

[40]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Stiffness design of geometrically nonlinear structures using topology optimization , 2000 .

[41]  R. Davies,et al.  Characterizing Al tailor-welded blanks for automotive applications , 1999 .

[42]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Topology optimization in crashworthiness design , 2006 .

[43]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[44]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Topology Synthesis of Structures Under Impact Loading Using a Hybrid Cellular Automaton Algorithm , 2006 .

[45]  L. Watson,et al.  An inverse-measure-based unilevel architecture for reliability-based design optimization , 2007 .

[46]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Convergence analysis of hybrid cellular automata for topology optimization , 2010 .

[47]  Wei Wang,et al.  Deterministic Design, Reliability-Based Design and Robust Design , 1997 .

[48]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Topology Optimization for Synthesizing Extrusion Based Nonlinear Transient Designs , 2007, DAC 2007.

[49]  L. Schmit,et al.  Some Approximation Concepts for Structural Synthesis , 1974 .

[50]  J. Renaud,et al.  Optimality Conditions of the Hybrid Cellular Automata for Structural Optimization , 2007 .

[52]  Nielen Stander,et al.  A Topology Optimization Tool for LS-DYNA Users: LS-OPT/Topology , 2009 .

[53]  Andres Tovar,et al.  Bone Remodeling as a Hybrid Cellular Automaton Optimization Process , 2004 .