Benchmarking Supply Chain Flexibility using Data Envelopment Analysis

Organisations have been facing several disturbing events, problems and changes affecting overall performance of their Supply Chains (SCs). To be competitive by quickly responding to disruptions, building enough flexibility in SCs is emerging as a new business strategy. However, it is very difficult to identify how much flexibility is required in different functions of the SC, as it depends on the nature and level of uncertainty faced by the process, facility or organization. In this paper, SCF is logically attributed to a business function synonymously with the efficiency of the corresponding business unit, wherein the leveraging factors are treated as the inputs and the benefits as the outputs. Here, the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach is used as a benchmarking tool for deriving the advantage of optimisation in many ways.

[1]  Yong-Tae Park,et al.  An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach , 2005 .

[2]  E. Ngai,et al.  Supply chain flexibility in an uncertain environment: exploratory findings from five case studies , 2011 .

[3]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey , 1990 .

[4]  N. Avkiran.  INVESTIGATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE EFFICIENCIES OF AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES THROUGH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[5]  B. Kayis,et al.  Manufacturing flexibility and variability: an overview , 2004 .

[6]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Evaluation and Design of Supply Chain Operations using DEA , 2005 .

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[8]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring Information Technology's Indirect Impact on Firm Performance , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[9]  Joseph B. Skipper,et al.  Mitigating supply chain disruption: the importance of top management support to collaboration and flexibility , 2010 .

[10]  Z. M. Udin,et al.  Supply chain management from the perspective of value chain flexibility: an exploratory study , 2011 .

[11]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of interdependent decision making sub-units in DEA , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[12]  A. Subash Babu,et al.  Business excellence through supply chain flexibility in Indian industries: an investigative study , 2008 .

[13]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Supplier selection in an agile manufacturing environment using Data Envelopment Analysis and Analytical Network Process , 2008 .

[14]  Charu Chandra,et al.  Role of Flexibility in Supply Chain Design and Modeling – Introduction to the Special Issue , 2009 .

[15]  Michael Z. Hanani,et al.  Combining the AHP and DEA methodologies for selecting the best alternative , 2011 .

[16]  M. Naim,et al.  Supply chain flexibility as a determinant of supplier selection , 2010 .

[17]  Saati Saber,et al.  Validity Examination of EFQM's Results by DEA Models , 2008 .

[18]  Liang Liang,et al.  A DEA game model approach to supply chain efficiency , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  Hokey Min,et al.  A hybrid Data Envelopment Analysis and simulation methodology for measuring capacity utilisation and throughput efficiency of container terminals , 2008 .

[20]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[21]  Peter Schütz,et al.  The impact of flexibility on operational supply chain planning , 2011 .

[22]  Jung Woo Jung,et al.  A framework for managing supply-chain flexibility using a neural network , 2010 .

[23]  David L. Olson,et al.  Risk management models for supply chain: a scenario analysis of outsourcing to China , 2011 .

[24]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Re-exploring the Relationship Between Flexibility and the External Environment , 2004 .

[25]  R. Färe,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS: A FRONTIER APPROACH , 1995 .

[26]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[27]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[28]  Bin Li,et al.  Rough data envelopment analysis and its application to supply chain performance evaluation , 2009 .

[29]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Flexibility and performance : a literature critique and strategic framework , 1991 .

[30]  M. Stevenson,et al.  Supply chain flexibility: an inter‐firm empirical study , 2009 .

[31]  R. Ramanathan.  An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement , 2003 .

[32]  Mu-Chen Chen,et al.  Evaluating the cross-efficiency of information sharing in supply chains , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  A. Subash Babu,et al.  Perspectives, practices and future of supply chain flexibility , 2008 .

[34]  Walter Ukovich,et al.  DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  Effect of information sharing in supply chains with flexibility , 2009 .

[36]  Hui Sun,et al.  Extended data envelopment models and a practical tool to analyse product complexity related to product variety for an automobile assembly plant , 2010 .

[37]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Measuring the performance of multimode bus transit: A mixed structure network DEA model , 2009 .

[38]  Sami Kara,et al.  The role of human factors in flexibility management: A survey , 2002 .

[39]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  The efficient use of enterprise information for strategic advantage: A data envelopment analysis , 2009 .

[40]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks , 2008 .

[41]  S. Ranganathan,et al.  Supplier partnerships, information quality, supply chain flexibility, supply chain integration and organisational performance: the Indian story , 2011 .

[42]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model , 2008 .

[43]  James J. Cordeiro,et al.  The strategic implications of flexibility in manufacturing systems , 2000 .

[44]  W. Cook,et al.  Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches , 2000 .

[45]  Fong-Yuen Ding,et al.  Selecting a Third Party Logistics partner for operating a Materials Service Centre: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach , 2011 .

[46]  Kamel A. Fantazy,et al.  An empirical study of the relationships among strategy, flexibility, and performance in the supply chain context , 2009 .

[47]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[48]  Jim Browne,et al.  A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[49]  Zhejun Gong,et al.  An economic evaluation model of supply chain flexibility , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  Der-Chiang Li,et al.  Determining the optimal collaborative benchmarks in a supply chain , 2009 .

[51]  Haritha Saranga,et al.  Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  A. Subash Babu,et al.  Supply chain flexibility: a state-of-the-art survey , 2009 .

[53]  Sathasivam Mathiyalakan,et al.  A DEA approach for evaluating quality circles , 1996 .

[54]  Walter Ukovich,et al.  DEA-like models for efficiency evaluations of specialized and interdependent units , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[55]  Masayuki Koike,et al.  EFFICIENCY-MEASURING DEA MODEL FOR PRODUCTION SYSTEM WITH k INDEPENDENT SUBSYSTEMS , 2000 .