Novel Clostridium thermocellum Type I Cohesin-Dockerin Complexes Reveal a Single Binding Mode*

Background: In general, dockerins present two homologous cohesin-binding interfaces, which confer increased flexibility into cellulosomes. Results: The structure of two novel Coh-Doc complexes reveals a dockerin single-binding mode. Conclusion: Single-binding mode dockerins bind, preferentially, to cell surface cohesins. Significance: The dual binding mode is a property of cellulosomal dockerins. Protein-protein interactions play a pivotal role in a large number of biological processes exemplified by the assembly of the cellulosome. Integration of cellulosomal components occurs through the binding of type I cohesin modules located in a non-catalytic molecular scaffold to type I dockerin modules located at the C terminus of cellulosomal enzymes. The majority of type I dockerins display internal symmetry reflected by the presence of two essentially identical cohesin-binding surfaces. Here we report the crystal structures of two novel Clostridium thermocellum type I cohesin-dockerin complexes (CohOlpC-Doc124A and CohOlpA-Doc918). The data revealed that the two dockerins, Doc918 and Doc124A, are unusual because they lack the structural symmetry required to support a dual binding mode. Thus, in both cases, cohesin recognition is dominated by residues located at positions 11, 12, and 19 of one of the dockerin binding surfaces. The alternative binding mode is not possible (Doc918) or highly limited (Doc124A) because residues that assume the critical interacting positions, when dockerins are reoriented by 180°, make steric clashes with the cohesin. In common with a third dockerin (Doc258) that also presents a single binding mode, Doc124A directs the appended cellulase, Cel124A, to the surface of C. thermocellum and not to cellulosomes because it binds preferentially to type I cohesins located at the cell envelope. Although there are a few exceptions, such as Doc918 described here, these data suggest that there is considerable selective pressure for the evolution of a dual binding mode in type I dockerins that direct enzymes into cellulosomes.

[1]  E. Bayer,et al.  The cellulosomes: multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. , 2004, Annual review of microbiology.

[2]  E. Bayer,et al.  Ultrastructure of the cell surface cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum and its interaction with cellulose , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  P. Dhurjati,et al.  Interaction of the duplicated segment carried by Clostridium thermocellum cellulases with cellulosome components , 1991, FEBS letters.

[4]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[5]  Fei Long,et al.  BALBES: a molecular-replacement pipeline , 2007, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[6]  Harry J. Gilbert,et al.  Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin–dockerin complex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P. Alzari,et al.  The cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. , 1998, Biochemical Society transactions.

[8]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[9]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[10]  Lee R Lynd,et al.  Enzyme–microbe synergy during cellulose hydrolysis by Clostridium thermocellum , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  H. Gilbert,et al.  Insights into the structural determinants of cohesin-dockerin specificity revealed by the crystal structure of the type II cohesin from Clostridium thermocellum SdbA. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Edward A Bayer,et al.  Evidence for a dual binding mode of dockerin modules to cohesins , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  Correspondence e-mail: , 2000 .

[14]  Paul D. Adams,et al.  short communications Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 1998 .

[15]  Harry J. Gilbert,et al.  Cellulosomes: highly efficient nanomachines designed to deconstruct plant cell wall complex carbohydrates. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[16]  P. Evans,et al.  Scaling and assessment of data quality. , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[17]  K. Sakka,et al.  Functional insights into the role of novel type I cohesin and dockerin domains from Clostridium thermocellum. , 2009, The Biochemical journal.

[18]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  J. Aubert,et al.  Involvement of separate domains of the cellulosomal protein S1 of Clostridium thermocellum in binding to cellulose and in anchoring of catalytic subunits to the cellulosome , 1992, FEBS letters.

[20]  Edward A Bayer,et al.  The Clostridium cellulolyticum Dockerin Displays a Dual Binding Mode for Its Cohesin Partner* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Serge X. Cohen,et al.  Automated macromolecular model building for X-ray crystallography using ARP/wARP version 7 , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[22]  Andrew G. W. Leslie,et al.  Processing diffraction data with mosflm , 2007 .

[23]  E. Bayer,et al.  Structural insights into a unique cellulase fold and mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  K Cowtan,et al.  Combining constraints for electron-density modification. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[26]  H. Gilbert,et al.  Escherichia coli expression, purification, crystallization, and structure determination of bacterial cohesin-dockerin complexes. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[27]  K. Henrick,et al.  Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  From cellulosomes to cellulosomics. , 2008, Chemical record.

[29]  B. Matthews.  Solvent content of protein crystals. , 1968, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[31]  P Béguin,et al.  A new type of cohesin domain that specifically binds the dockerin domain of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome-integrating protein CipA , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  J. Aubert,et al.  Recognition specificity of the duplicated segments present in Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase CelD and in the cellulosome-integrating protein CipA , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .