Integration Techniques for Multi-Disciplinary HCI Modelling : A Survey The Amodeus-2 Consortium

A growing number of HCI models provide insights into humanand system-oriented aspects of design artefacts. Experience with modelling in practice suggests that the more difficult design problems are cross-disciplinary, and there is a need to be able to integrate both the results and the process of HCI modelling. This document reports on the techniques for integration that have been developed and applied within a multi-disciplinary HCI project. We describe the techniques, their roles within the project, and where appropriate the results of using specific techniques to integrate multi-disciplinary modelling of large design spaces. We draw some conclusions about the relationship between techniques, their role in the design process, and their future potential.

[1]  U. Eco.  A Theory of Semiotics , 1977 .

[2]  John Karat,et al.  A Comparison of Menu Selection Techniques: Touch Panel, Mouse and Keyboard , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[3]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  PAC, an Object Oriented Model for Dialog Design , 1987 .

[4]  gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion , 1988, CSCW '88.

[5]  Richard M. Young,et al.  Programmable user models for predictive evaluation of interface designs , 1989, CHI '89.

[6]  Joëlle Coutaz.  Architecture Models for Interactive Software , 1989, ECOOP.

[7]  J. Michael Spivey,et al.  The Z notation - a reference manual , 1992, Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science.

[8]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Design rationale: the argument behind the artifact , 1989, CHI '89.

[9]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Knowledge Representation in Fuzzy Logic , 1996, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[10]  P. Barnard,et al.  Integrating cognitive and system models in human computer interaction , 1990 .

[11]  Jintae Lee.  SIBYL: a tool for managing group design rationale , 1990, CSCW '90.

[12]  Allan MacLean,et al.  What rationale is there in design? , 1990, INTERACT.

[13]  José Luiz Fiadeiro,et al.  Sharing Actions and Attributes in Modal Action Logic , 1991, TACS.

[14]  Guillermo Arango,et al.  A tool shelf for tracking design decisions , 1991, IEEE Software.

[15]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  D. Vernant,et al.  Approche actionnelle et modèle projectif du dialogue informatif , 1992 .

[17]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[18]  T. Carey,et al.  Integrating widget design knowledge with user interface toolkits , 1992, [1992] Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering.

[19]  Heather Stark,et al.  "A Theory of Computer Semiotics: Semiotic Approaches to Construction and Assessment of Computer Systems, " by P. Bogh Andersen (Book Review) , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  Victoria Bellotti,et al.  Integrating theoreticians' and practitioners' perspectives with design rationale , 1993, INTERCHI.

[21]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  On the use of LOTOS to describe graphical interaction , 1993 .

[22]  Fabio Paternò.  Definition of Properties of User Interfaces Using Action-Based Temporal Logic , 1993, SEKE.

[23]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  MATIS: A multimodal airline travel information system , 1993 .

[24]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  The MSM Framework: A Design Space for Multi-Sensori-Motor Systems , 1993, EWHCI.

[25]  S Buckingham Shum,et al.  Developing the Design Space with Design Space Analysis , 1993 .

[26]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Multi-Perspective Modelling of Interface Design Issues: Undo in a Collaborative Editor , 1994, British Computer Society Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.

[27]  Nick Hammond,et al.  Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost? , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Interactions with Advanced Graphical Interfaces and the Deployment of Latent Human Knowledge , 1994, DSV-IS.

[29]  Allan MacLean,et al.  Reasoning with Design Rationale: practical experience with design space analysis , 1994 .

[30]  Giorgio P. Faconti,et al.  Visual Representation of Formal Specification: an Application to Hierarchical Logical Input Devices , 1994, DSV-IS.

[31]  Michael D. Harrison,et al.  From Formal Models to Formal Methods , 1994, ICSE Workshop on SE-HCI.

[32]  Allan MacLean,et al.  Integrating and Communicating Design Perspectives with QOC Design Rationale , 1994 .

[33]  Michael D. Harrison,et al.  A Theory of Presentations , 1994, FME.

[34]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Four easy pieces for assessing the usability of multimodal interaction: the CARE properties , 1995, INTERACT.

[35]  Nick Hammond,et al.  Multidisciplinary modelling in HCI design…in theory and in practice , 1995, CHI '95.

[36]  Michael D. Harrison,et al.  Interaction and Task Requirements , 1995, DSV-IS.

[37]  Niels-ole Bernsen,et al.  INFORMATION MAPPING Knowledge-based support for user interface design , 1995 .

[38]  Jonathan P. Bowen,et al.  Seven More Myths of Formal Methods , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[39]  Joëlle Coutaz,et al.  A generic platform for addressing the multimodal challenge , 1995, CHI '95.

[40]  Ann Blandford,et al.  The Requirements Engineering of User Freedom , 1995 .

[41]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Design Argumentation as Design Rationale , 1996 .

[42]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Cognitive Dimensions of Design Rationale , 1997 .