Manufacturing a press die for car body panel usually starts from making a Styrofoam pattern (for short, ‘pattern’) for lost wax casting process. Industry trend is to build patterns by NC machining. Since the mating planes for assembly or die face of casting stock are to be machined later, pattern should have some stock allowance on those surfaces, which can be as large as 12 mm. That means pattern itself can have fairly large amount of machining tolerance compared to die machining. Styrofoam is easy to cut, but fragile. Hence, the process planning for pattern machining should reflect some different aspects than that of die machining. In this paper, presented is the generative approach taken by Chrysler to create tool path to cut pattern from the CAD model of die. The approach includes steps of 1) feature recognition, 2) automatic process planning and 3) tool path generation.
[1]
Yong Se Kim,et al.
Recognition of form features using convex decomposition
,
1992,
Comput. Aided Des..
[2]
B. Choi.
Surface Modeling for Cad/Cam
,
1991
.
[3]
Jami J. Shah,et al.
Parametric and Feature-Based CAD/CAM: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications
,
1995
.
[4]
David C. Gossard,et al.
Recognizing shape features in solid models
,
1990,
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
[5]
J. W. Park,et al.
Unified CAM-system architecture for die and mould manufacturing
,
1994,
Comput. Aided Des..
[6]
Martin Held,et al.
On the Computational Geometry of Pocket Machining
,
1991,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[7]
T. C. Chang,et al.
Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model
,
1988
.