World trend in energy: an extension to DEA applied to energy and environment

This study proposes a use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the performance of energy industries. The DEA is a nonparametric approach that does not assume any functional form for performance assessment. The purpose of this study is to discuss how DEA can examine the current energy industries and their trends in the world. The energy is separated into primary and secondary categories. The primary energy is classified into fossil and non-fossil fuels. The fossil fuels include oil, natural gas and coal, while the non-fossil ones include nuclear and renewable energies (e.g., solar, wind, biomass, water and others). Energy consumption is essential for developing economic prosperity in all nations. However, a use of various energy resources usually produces many different types of pollutions (e.g., air, soil and water pollutions), leading to a huge damage on our society and human health. Thus, it is important for us to understand a general trend of world energy when we consider various environmental issues. This study discusses electricity as a representative of secondary energy. It is not easy to maintain a high level of social balance, so-called sustainability between economic development and environmental protection. As the initial step for sustainability development, this study summarizes a general trend of energy whose consumption has been increasing along with an economic development and a population increase in the world. Along with discussing the trend of world energy, this study describes why DEA is useful as one of the methodologies to assess a social balance between economic success and environmental protection by identifying a level of efficiency, later referred to as “unified (operational and environmental) efficiency.” Thus, this study conveys the research necessity of DEA environmental assessment on energy and sustainability from a perspective of supply and demand on energy resources in the world.

[1]  Rolf Färe,et al.  The Effect of Unions on Productivity: U.S. Surface Mining of Coal , 1988 .

[2]  Jyoti K. Parikh,et al.  Study of efficiency and productivity growth in opencast and underground coal mining in india: a DEA analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Andreas Kappeler,et al.  Efficiency analysis of German electricity distribution utilities – non-parametric and parametric tests , 2006 .

[4]  Alexander Vaninsky,et al.  Efficiency of electric power generation in the United States: Analysis and forecast based on data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[5]  Philipp von Geymueller,et al.  Static versus dynamic DEA in electricity regulation: the case of US transmission system operators , 2009, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  Bootstrapped efficiency measures of oil blocks in Angola , 2009 .

[7]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Junjie Wu,et al.  Comparative study on efficiency performance of listed coal mining companies in China and the US , 2009 .

[9]  C. Barros,et al.  Productivity assessment of Angola's oil blocks , 2009 .

[10]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .

[11]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[12]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Consumer choice on ecologically efficient water heaters: Marketing strategy and policy implications in Japan , 2011 .

[13]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Environmental assessment by DEA radial measurement: U.S. coal-fired power plants in ISO (Independent System Operator) and RTO (Regional Transmission Organization) , 2012 .

[15]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: Methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models , 2012 .

[16]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment and planning: Desirable procedures to evaluate fossil fuel power plants , 2012 .

[17]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: Theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions , 2012 .

[18]  Amy H. I. Lee,et al.  An Integrated Performance Evaluation Model for the Photovoltaics Industry , 2012 .

[19]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  An integrated fuzzy regression-data envelopment analysis algorithm for optimum oil consumption estimation with ambiguous data , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[20]  Angeliki N. Menegaki,et al.  Growth and renewable energy in Europe: Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis , 2013 .

[21]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: An impact of U.S. clean air act on coal-fired power plants , 2013 .

[22]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment in a time horizon: Malmquist index on fuel mix, electricity and CO2 of industrial nations , 2013 .

[23]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment: A comparative study between Japanese chemical and pharmaceutical firms , 2014 .

[24]  Niels Vestergaard,et al.  Productivity and efficiency measurement of the Danish centralized biogas power sector , 2016 .

[25]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Environmental assessment for corporate sustainability by resource utilization and technology innovation: DEA radial measurement on Japanese industrial sectors , 2014 .

[26]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Photovoltaic power stations in Germany and the United States: A comparative study by data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[27]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment in time horizon: Radial approach for Malmquist index measurement on petroleum companies , 2015 .

[28]  Maurizio Carlini,et al.  DEA (data envelopment analysis)-assisted supporting measures for ground coupled heat pumps implementing in Italy: A case study , 2015 .

[29]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Japanese fuel mix strategy after disaster of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant: Lessons from international comparison among industrial nations measured by DEA environmental assessment in time horizon , 2015 .

[30]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Ranking electricity distribution units using slacks-based measure, strong complementary slackness condition, and discriminant analysis , 2015 .

[31]  Yuanxin Liu,et al.  The industrial performance of wind power industry in China , 2015 .

[32]  R.C.W. Webber-Youngman,et al.  A proposed approach for modelling competitiveness of new surface coal mines , 2015 .

[33]  A Azadeh,et al.  An integrated experiment for identification of best decision styles and teamworks with respect to HSE and ergonomics program: The case of a large oil refinery. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Chun-Yu Lin,et al.  An Integrated Decision-Making Model for the Location of a PV Solar Plant , 2015 .

[35]  He-rui Cui,et al.  Incentive Policy Research on the Excess Profit Allocation in Wind Power Projects Based on DEA Game , 2016 .

[36]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Assessment of large commercial rooftop photovoltaic system installations: Evidence from California , 2017 .

[37]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment , 2017 .

[38]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Environmental Assessment on Energy and Sustainability by Data Envelopment Analysis , 2018 .

[39]  Italy case study , 2019 .