A Structural Characterization of Market Power in Power Markets

We consider a market in which capacity-constrained generators compete in scalar-parameterized supply functions to serve an inelastic demand spread throughout a transmission constrained power network. The market clears according to a locational marginal pricing mechanism, in which the independent system operator (ISO) determines the generators' production quantities to minimize the revealed cost of meeting demand, while ensuring that network transmission and generator capacity constraints are met. Under the stylizing assumption that both the ISO and generators choose their strategies simultaneously, we establish the existence of Nash equilibria for the underlying market, and derive an upper bound on the allocative efficiency loss at Nash equilibrium relative to the socially optimal level. We also characterize an upper bound on the markup of locational marginal prices at Nash equilibrium above their perfectly competitive levels. Of particular relevance to ex ante market power monitoring, these bounds reveal the role of certain market structures---specifically, the market share and residual supply index of a producer---in predicting the degree to which that producer is able to exercise market power to influence the market outcome to its advantage. Finally, restricting our attention to the simpler setting of a two-node power network, we provide a characterization of market structures under which a Braess-like paradox occurs due to the exercise of market power---that is to say, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition on market structure under which the strengthening of the network's transmission line capacity results in the (counterintuitive) increase in the total cost of generation at Nash equilibrium.

[1]  Andrew Sweeting,et al.  Market Power in the England and Wales Wholesale Electricity Market 1995-2000 , 2004 .

[2]  Edward J. Anderson,et al.  Finding Supply Function Equilibria with Asymmetric Firms , 2008, Oper. Res..

[3]  Bert Willems,et al.  Cournot Versus Supply Functions: What Does the Data Tell Us? , 2007 .

[4]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Economic Inefficiency of Passive Transmission Rights in Congested Electricity Systems with Competitive Generation , 1997 .

[5]  A. Philpott,et al.  Supply function equilibria in transportation networks , 2014 .

[6]  R. Green,et al.  Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case equilibria , 1999 .

[8]  A. Rudkevich,et al.  Modeling Electricity Pricing in a Deregulated Generation Industry : The Potential for Oligopoly Pricing in a Poolco , 2022 .

[9]  S. Borenstein,et al.  The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry , 1997 .

[10]  Stanley S. Reynolds,et al.  Supply function equilibria with capacity constraints and pivotal suppliers , 2011 .

[11]  R. Baldick,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS 1 Bidding Into Electricity Markets: A Transmission-Constrained Residual Dem , 2022 .

[12]  S. Reynolds,et al.  Pivotal Suppliers and Market Power in Experimental Supply Function Competition , 2014 .

[13]  S. Bose,et al.  A Unifying Market Power Measure for Deregulated Transmission-Constrained Electricity Markets , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Network-constrained Cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: the devil is in the details , 2005 .

[15]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Electricity Restructuring: Deregulation or Reregulation? , 2000 .

[16]  X. Vives Strategic Supply Function Competition with Private Information , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  R. Green,et al.  Increasing Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1996 .

[18]  D. Newbery Predicting Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets , 2009 .

[19]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Parameterized Supply Function Bidding: Equilibrium and Efficiency , 2011, Oper. Res..

[20]  Derek Scully,et al.  Modeling EU Electricity Market Competition Using the Residual Supply Index , 2010 .

[21]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: a game theoretic approach , 1999 .

[22]  Richard Green,et al.  A Review of the Monitoring of Market Power The Possible Roles of TSOs in Monitoring for Market Power Issues in Congested Transmission Systems , 2005 .

[23]  A. Steinmetz,et al.  Screening Instruments for Monitoring Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets – Lessons from Applications in Germany , 2014 .

[24]  R. Baldick Electricity Market Equilibrium Models: The Effect of Parameterization , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[25]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty , 1989 .

[26]  Huifu Xu,et al.  Nash equilibria in electricity markets with discrete prices , 2004, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[27]  Daniel Ralph,et al.  Supply Function Equilibria: Step Functions and Continuous Representations , 2008 .

[28]  D. Bunn,et al.  Divestiture of Generation Assets in the Electricity Pool of England and Wales: A Computational Approach to Analyzing Market Power , 2001 .

[29]  J. Pang,et al.  Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: an MPEC approach , 2000 .

[30]  A. Lerner The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power , 1934 .

[31]  Youfei Liu,et al.  Impacts of Network Constraints on Electricity Market Equilibrium , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[32]  Eilyan Bitar,et al.  Parameterized supply function equilibrium in power networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[33]  S. Low,et al.  Demand Response With Capacity Constrained Supply Function Bidding , 2016 .

[34]  E. Kahn,et al.  A quantitative analysis of pricing behavior in California's wholesale electricity market during summer 2000 , 2001, 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262).

[35]  S. Oren,et al.  Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets , 2006 .

[36]  D. Newbery,et al.  The Supply Function Equilibrium and its Policy Implications for Wholesale Electricity Auctions , 2009 .

[37]  Rahul Jain,et al.  Game-theoretic analysis of the nodal pricing mechanism for electricity markets , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[38]  Ermin Wei,et al.  Efficiency of linear supply function bidding in electricity markets , 2015, 2015 49th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[39]  Dietrich Braess,et al.  Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung , 1968, Unternehmensforschung.

[40]  S. Oren,et al.  Protecting the Market from "Hockey Stick" Pricing: How the Public Utility Commission of Texas is Dealing with Potential Price Gouging , 2004 .

[41]  Edward J. Anderson,et al.  Using Supply Functions for Offering Generation into an Electricity Market , 2002, Oper. Res..

[42]  Jian Yao,et al.  Modeling and Computing Two-Settlement Oligopolistic Equilibrium in a Congested Electricity Network , 2006, Oper. Res..

[43]  M. L. Baughman,et al.  An Empirical Study of Applied Game Theory: Transmission Constrained Cournot Behavior , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[44]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Nash-Cournot Equilibria in Power Markets on a Linearized DC Network with Arbitrage: Formulations and Properties , 2003 .

[45]  S. Borenstein,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California&Apos;S Electricity Industry , 1998 .

[46]  Catherine D. Wolfram,et al.  Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1999 .

[47]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Linear Complementarity Models of Nash-Cournot Competition in Bilateral and POOLCO Power Markets , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[48]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Transaction analysis in deregulated power systems using game theory , 1997 .

[49]  Robert Wilson,et al.  Supply Function Equilibrium in a Constrained Transmission System , 2008, Oper. Res..

[50]  A. Rahimi,et al.  Effective market monitoring in deregulated electricity markets , 2003 .

[51]  Jian Yao,et al.  Two-settlement electricity markets with price caps and Cournot generation firms , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  R. Belmans,et al.  Usefulness of DC power flow for active power flow analysis , 2005, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005.

[53]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Nash-Cournot Equilibria in Electric Power Markets with Piecewise Linear Demand Functions and Joint Constraints , 2007, Oper. Res..

[54]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Demand Response Using Linear Supply Function Bidding , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[55]  R. Baldick,et al.  Theory and Application of Linear Supply Function Equilibrium in Electricity Markets , 2004 .

[56]  C. Berge Topological Spaces: including a treatment of multi-valued functions , 2010 .

[57]  Adam Wierman,et al.  The role of a market maker in networked cournot competition , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[58]  Aleksandr Rudkevich,et al.  On the supply function equilibrium and its applications in electricity markets , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[59]  L. Tesfatsion,et al.  An Agent-Based Test Bed Study of Wholesale Power Market Performance Measures , 2008, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[60]  R. Baldick,et al.  Capacity Constrained Supply Function Equilibrium Models of Electricity Markets: Stability, Non- decreasing constraints, and Function Space Iterations , 2002 .