Pupil responses to high-level image content.

The link between arousal and pupil dilation is well studied, but it is less known that other cognitive processes can trigger pupil responses. Here we present evidence that pupil responses can be induced by high-level scene processing, independent of changes in low-level features or arousal. In Experiment 1, we recorded changes in pupil diameter of observers while they viewed a variety of natural scenes with or without a sun that were presented either upright or inverted. Image inversion had the strongest effect on the pupil responses. The pupil constricted more to the onset of upright images as compared to inverted images. Furthermore, the amplitudes of pupil constrictions to viewing images containing a sun were larger relative to control images. In Experiment 2, we presented cartoon versions of upright and inverted pictures that included either a sun or a moon. The image backgrounds were kept identical across conditions. Similar to Experiment 1, upright images triggered pupil constrictions with larger amplitudes than inverted images and images of the sun evoked greater pupil contraction than images of the moon. We suggest that the modulations of pupil responses were due to higher-level interpretations of image content.

[1]  J L Barbur,et al.  Pupillary responses to stimulus structure, colour and movement , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[2]  Paola Binda,et al.  Attention to Bright Surfaces Enhances the Pupillary Light Reflex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  M Clynes,et al.  COLOR DYNAMICS OF THE PUPIL , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[5]  B. E. Eckbo,et al.  Appendix , 1826, Epilepsy Research.

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[7]  E. Bárány,et al.  Phasic inhibition of the light reflex of the pupil during retinal rivalry. , 1948, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Pupil Size as a Measure of Arousal during Information Processing , 1967, Nature.

[9]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Face inversion impairs holistic perception: evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[10]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  M. Djamgoz,et al.  Basic and Clinical Perspectives in Vision Research , 1995, Springer US.

[12]  G. Fernández,et al.  Understanding Low Reliability of Memories for Neutral Information Encoded under Stress: Alterations in Memory-Related Activation in the Hippocampus and Midbrain , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  K. F. Scapinello,et al.  The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli , 1970 .

[14]  Attenuation of the pupil response during binocular rivalry. , 1966, Vision research.

[15]  John L. Barbur,et al.  A Study of Pupil Response Components in Human Vision , 1995 .

[16]  J L Barbur,et al.  Visual processing levels revealed by response latencies to changes in different visual attributes , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  Flynn Jt,et al.  Pupillary responses in rivalry and amblyopia. , 1969 .

[19]  A. G. Goldstein Learning of inverted and normally oriented faces in children and adults , 1965 .

[20]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? , 2005 .

[21]  Sander Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Pupil Diameter Predicts Changes in the Exploration–Exploitation Trade-off: Evidence for the Adaptive Gain Theory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Pupillary responses in rivalry and amblyopia. , 1969, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[24]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[25]  Christof Koch,et al.  Fully Formatted Pdf and Full Text (html) Versions Will Be Made Available Soon. Pupil Dilation Betrays the Timing of Decisions , 2022 .

[26]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J. Diamond,et al.  Sclerotomy complications following pars plana vitrectomy , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[30]  Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al.  Perceptual Rivalry: Reflexes Reveal the Gradual Nature of Visual Awareness , 2011, PloS one.

[31]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[32]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  M. Bradley,et al.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[34]  K. N. Ogle,et al.  Dynamics of the pupil during binocular rivalry. , 1966, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[35]  V. Campion-Vincent,et al.  The Tell-Tale Eye , 1999 .

[36]  Ueli Rutishauser,et al.  Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[37]  Thomas Serre,et al.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  T. Vilis,et al.  Face Inversion Reduces the Persistence of Global Form and Its Neural Correlates , 2011, PLoS ONE.

[39]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  W. Einhäuser,et al.  Animal detection and identification in natural scenes: image statistics and emotional valence. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[41]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[42]  M. Fahle,et al.  How Much of the “Unconscious” is Just Pre – Threshold? , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  J. Beatty,et al.  Pupillometric signs of brain activation vary with level of cognitive processing. , 1978, Science.

[44]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  B. Laeng,et al.  Bright illusions reduce the eye's pupil , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  J. Yellott,et al.  A unified formula for light-adapted pupil size. , 2012, Journal of vision.