Are low-literate and high-literate consumers different? Applying resource-matching theory to ad processing across literacy levels

Abstract This research investigates whether low-literate consumers process written advertisements differently than high-literate consumers do. Consistent with resource-matching theory (RMT), the first experiment reveals that, unlike high-literate processors, when low-literate processors read ads of moderate complexity, involvement with the ad does not affect processing. The second experiment extends RMT's applicability to both low- and high-literate consumers by demonstrating that low-literate processors' reading outcomes mirror those of high-literate processors when ads are written to reflect their reading capability.

[1]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[2]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families? , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency? , 1992 .

[4]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[5]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses , 1999 .

[6]  Maryanne Wolf,et al.  Reading Fluency and Its Intervention , 2001 .

[7]  Robert Meeds,et al.  Surface-structure transformations and advertising slogans: The case for moderate syntactic complexity , 2002 .

[8]  Hyon B. Shin,et al.  Language Use and English-Speaking Ability: 2000. Census 2000 Brief. , 2003 .

[9]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Color: How the Correspondence between Available and Required Resources Affects Attitudes , 1995 .

[10]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  The impact of the Internet and consumer motivation on evaluation of prices , 2003 .

[11]  Haeran Jae,et al.  Decision Making by Low-Literacy Consumers in the Presence of Point-of-Purchase Information , 2004 .

[12]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Emotional Persuasion: When the Valence versus the Resource Demands of Emotions Influence Consumers’ Attitudes , 2009 .

[13]  A. Triebel.  Literacy in Developed and Developing Countries , 2005 .

[14]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Picture-Based Persuasion Processes and the Moderating Role of Involvement , 1991 .

[15]  Lan Xia,et al.  Understanding the influence of literacy on consumer memory: The role of pictorial elements , 2009 .

[16]  M. Viswanathan,et al.  Functional Illiteracy and Nutritional Education in the United States: A Research-Based Approach to the Development of Nutritional Education Materials for Functionally Illiterate Consumers , 2005 .

[17]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes , 1988 .

[18]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[19]  David Luna,et al.  Integrating Ad Information: A Text-Processing Perspective , 2005 .

[20]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising , 1988 .

[21]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  Speech recognition-based and automaticity programs to help students with severe reading and spelling problems , 2004, Annals of dyslexia.

[22]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Processing Product Unique Features , 2001 .

[23]  J. Aaker,et al.  Additivity versus attenuation : the role of culture in the resolution of information incongruity , 1997 .

[24]  Michael J. Sherrard,et al.  The role of sensation seeking and need for cognition on web-site evaluations : a resource-matching perspective , 2005 .

[25]  Hans Baumgartner,et al.  Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation , 2001 .

[26]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  The Low Literate Consumer , 2005 .

[27]  D. Cowles,et al.  Picture–Text Incongruency in Print Advertisements among Low‐ and High‐Literacy Consumers , 2008 .

[28]  M. Daneman,et al.  Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context , 1986 .

[29]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Evaluating persuasion-enhancing techniques from a resource-matching perspective , 1997 .

[30]  J. Willinsky.  The Construction of a Crisis: Literacy in Canada , 1990 .

[31]  E. Greenleaf,et al.  MEASURING EXTREME RESPONSE STYLE , 1992 .

[32]  José Antonio Rosa,et al.  Decision Making and Coping of Functionally Illiterate Consumers and Some Implications for Marketing Management , 2005 .

[33]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Effects of Brand Local and Nonlocal Origin on Consumer Attitudes in Developing Countries , 2000 .

[34]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Cultural and Situational Contingencies and the Theory of Reasoned Action: Application to Fast Food Restaurant Consumption , 2000 .

[35]  Manoj Hastak,et al.  Understanding and Facilitating the Usage of Nutritional Labels by Low-Literate Consumers , 2009 .

[36]  Tina M. Lowrey.  The Effects of Syntactic Complexity on Advertising Persuasiveness , 1998 .

[37]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Testing consumers' motivation and linguistic ability as moderators of advertising readability , 2003 .

[38]  R. Petty,et al.  The Influence of Spokesperson Trustworthiness on Message Elaboration, Attitude Strength, and Advertising Effectiveness , 2003 .

[39]  Presidential Address Dimensions of Consumer Expertise Or Lack Thereof , 2000 .

[40]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Examining children's reading performance and preference for different computer-displayed text , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[41]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .