Patterns of Functional Loss Among Older People: A Prospective Analysis

Objective: Patterns of capability loss and disability onset among older people were investigated prospectively. Background: With aging, the gap between personal capability and environmental demand becomes wider, resulting in higher levels of disability in daily activities. Methods: Data from a longitudinal, population-based study were obtained for analysis, which recruited a representative sample of 13,004 people aged 65 years and older from five sites in Great Britain. Participants completed a baseline interview during 1990 to 1994 and follow-up interviews after 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 10 years. Those who reported full vision, hearing, thinking, locomotion, reaching, and dexterity ability as well as no disability in cooking, housework, shopping, and transportation at baseline were included in a survival analysis. Results: Locomotion was the first ability to be lost, followed by reaching, thinking, hearing, vision, and dexterity. Age at onset of disability was earliest for shopping, then housework, transportation, and cooking. Women were consistently younger at capability loss and disability onset than men except in terms of hearing and cooking. Conclusion: These findings suggest that capabilities required for product and service interaction follow a hierarchical pattern of loss, which has practical implications for design. Although interventions to reduce disability in the older population are likely to require changes that address more than one demand, capabilities lost early in old age should take precedence over those lost later. Application: A potential application of this research is in the development of an overall design strategy to enhance older people’s ability to live independently.

[1]  B. Ford International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps , 1984, Releve epidemiologique hebdomadaire.

[2]  B. Ford International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. , 1984, The Medical journal of Australia.

[3]  P. Satz,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Mini-Mental State Exam in neurologically intact elderly. , 1991, Journal of clinical psychology.

[4]  Carol Brayne,et al.  An investigation of whether factors associated with short-term attrition change or persist over ten years: data from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS) , 2006, BMC public health.

[5]  A. Nissinen,et al.  Self-reported and performance-based functional status and associated factors among elderly men: the Finnish cohorts of the Seven Countries Study. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  G Kishi,et al.  Reliability and Validity , 1999 .

[7]  R A Weber,et al.  A human factors analysis of ADL activities: a capability-demand approach. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[8]  T. Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ag Survey into health problems of elderly people: multivariate analysis of concordance between self-report and proxy information. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  D B Reuben,et al.  The predictive validity of self-report and performance-based measures of function and health. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[10]  Carol Jagger,et al.  A review of instrumental ADL assessments for use with elderly people , 1998 .

[11]  K. Morgan,et al.  Physical illness and disability among elderly people in England and Wales: the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. The Analysis Group. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  V Mor,et al.  Measurement of need for assistance with daily activities: quantifying the influence of gender roles. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[13]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[14]  L G Branch,et al.  Short‐Term Variability of Measures of Physical Function in Older People , 1990, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  Carol Brayne,et al.  Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation , 2004, BMC public health.

[16]  H Whittle,et al.  Functional health status and instrumental activities of daily living performance in noninstitutionalized elderly people. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[17]  M. McGee,et al.  The description of activities of daily living in five centres in England and Wales. Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. , 1998, Age and ageing.

[18]  M. Thorslund,et al.  The structure of IADL and ADL measures: some findings from a Swedish study. , 1991, Age and ageing.

[19]  A. Stuck,et al.  Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Vicki A Freedman,et al.  Asking Neutral Versus Leading Questions , 2003, Journal of aging and health.

[21]  Mats Thorslund,et al.  Do actions speak louder than words? Self-assessed and performance-based measures of physical and visual function among old people , 2006, European journal of ageing.

[22]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Functional Limitations to Daily Living Tasks in the Aged: A Focus Group Analysis , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[23]  A M Jette,et al.  The disablement process. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[24]  W. Satariano,et al.  Epidemiology Of Aging: An Ecological Approach , 2005 .

[25]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Countering Design Exclusion: An Introduction to Inclusive Design , 2003 .

[26]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Late Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[27]  Simeon Keates,et al.  A framework for minimising design exclusion , 2003 .

[28]  Margaretha Nydahl,et al.  Managing food shopping and cooking: the experiences of older Swedish women , 2001, Ageing and Society.

[29]  Simeon Keates,et al.  User capabilities and product demands , 2003 .

[30]  S. Bassett,et al.  Use of proxies to measure health and functional status in epidemiologic studies of community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  Providing Strategic User Information for Designers: Methods and Initial Findings , 2006 .

[32]  M Clarke,et al.  Patterns of Onset of Disability in Activities of Daily Living with Age , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[33]  I. Rosow,et al.  A Guttman health scale for the aged. , 1966, Journal of gerontology.

[34]  C. Brayne,et al.  Health and ill-health in the older population in England and Wales. The Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). , 2001, Age and ageing.

[35]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Inclusive design toolkit , 2007 .

[36]  M. Lawton,et al.  Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. , 1969, The Gerontologist.

[37]  M. C. Clark,et al.  Older Adults and Daily Living Task Profiles , 1990, Human factors.

[38]  John Clarkson HUMAN CAPABILITY AND PRODUCT DESIGN , 2008 .

[39]  A Chapanis,et al.  Human engineering environments for the aged. , 1974, Applied ergonomics.