Sparse reconstruction of compressive sensing MRI using cross-domain stochastically fully connected conditional random fields

BackgroundMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a crucial medical imaging technology for the screening and diagnosis of frequently occurring cancers. However, image quality may suffer from long acquisition times for MRIs due to patient motion, which also leads to patient discomfort. Reducing MRI acquisition times can reduce patient discomfort leading to reduced motion artifacts from the acquisition process. Compressive sensing strategies applied to MRI have been demonstrated to be effective in decreasing acquisition times significantly by sparsely sampling the k-space during the acquisition process. However, such a strategy requires advanced reconstruction algorithms to produce high quality and reliable images from compressive sensing MRI.MethodsThis paper proposes a new reconstruction approach based on cross-domain stochastically fully connected conditional random fields (CD-SFCRF) for compressive sensing MRI. The CD-SFCRF introduces constraints in both k-space and spatial domains within a stochastically fully connected graphical model to produce improved MRI reconstruction.ResultsExperimental results using T2-weighted (T2w) imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the prostate show strong performance in preserving fine details and tissue structures in the reconstructed images when compared to other tested methods even at low sampling rates.ConclusionsThe ability to better utilize a limited amount of information to reconstruct T2w and DWI images in a short amount of time while preserving the important details in the images demonstrates the potential of the proposed CD-SFCRF framework as a viable reconstruction algorithm for compressive sensing MRI.

[1]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Markov random field segmentation of brain MR images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Enhanced dual-stage correlated diffusion imaging , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[3]  H. Nyquist,et al.  Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory , 1928, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[4]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[5]  Junfeng Yang,et al.  A New Alternating Minimization Algorithm for Total Variation Image Reconstruction , 2008, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[6]  Di Guo,et al.  Compressed sensing MRI with combined sparsifying transforms and smoothed l0 norm minimization , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[7]  Wotao Yin,et al.  An Iterative Regularization Method for Total Variation-Based Image Restoration , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[8]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  MAPS: A Quantitative Radiomics Approach for Prostate Cancer Detection , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Jurgen Futterer,et al.  Multiparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer , 2014, BioMed research international.

[10]  S. Ljunggren A simple graphical representation of fourier-based imaging methods , 1983 .

[11]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data , 2001, ICML.

[12]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  K. T. Block,et al.  Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Feng Liu,et al.  Compressed sensing MRI using Singular Value Decomposition based sparsity basis , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Rick Chartrand,et al.  Fast algorithms for nonconvex compressive sensing: MRI reconstruction from very few data , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[16]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Dual-stage correlated diffusion imaging , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[17]  L. Ying,et al.  Accelerating SENSE using compressed sensing , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  David A. Clausi,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction of Breast MRI Using Homotopic $L_0$ Minimization in a Regional Sparsified Domain , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  E.J. Candes Compressive Sampling , 2022 .

[20]  J. C. Ye,et al.  Projection reconstruction MR imaging using FOCUSS , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2015, Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging.

[22]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Automated prostate cancer detection via comprehensive multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging texture feature models , 2015, BMC Medical Imaging.

[23]  Pushmeet Kohli,et al.  Markov Random Fields for Vision and Image Processing , 2011 .

[24]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[25]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  A Multi-Parametric Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Texture Feature Model for Prostate Cancer Analysis , 2014 .

[26]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Highly Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction via Homotopic $\ell_{0}$ -Minimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Tom Goldstein,et al.  The Split Bregman Method for L1-Regularized Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[28]  Paul W. Fieguth,et al.  Efficient Bayesian inference using fully connected conditional random fields with stochastic cliques , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[29]  Wotao Yin,et al.  Bregman Iterative Algorithms for (cid:2) 1 -Minimization with Applications to Compressed Sensing ∗ , 2008 .

[30]  Zhong Chen,et al.  Compressed sensing MRI based on nonsubsampled contourlet transform , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education.

[31]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Statistical Textural Distinctiveness in Multi-Parametric Prostate MRI for Suspicious Region Detection , 2015, ICIAR.

[32]  Society of magnetic resonance in medicine , 1990 .

[33]  Shanglian Bao,et al.  Functional and anatomical properties of human visual cortical fields , 2015, Vision Research.

[34]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Correlated diffusion imaging , 2013, BMC Medical Imaging.

[35]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Parameter estimation and inverse problems , 2005 .

[36]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Superpixel-based Prostate Cancer Detection from Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2015 .

[37]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Multiparametric MRI prostate cancer analysis via a hybrid morphological-textural model , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.