Many methods are used to analyze delay claims, including schedule comparisons and cost flow data. Each of these methods is used to evaluate the claim and develop a concise method for analysis in order to move forward with the claim. The decision regarding a method to use is complicated, and depends on time, cost, and the material available. All methods attempt to identify, conclude, and rectify the claim at hand, and each method consists of specific requirements of information necessary to analyze the delay claim. Further, each method has its own pros and cons, which will be further, examined and compared. The obvious benefit of using methods already in use is that the professionals are familiar with them and use them frequently. The intent of this research was to delineate a common thread in the analysis of delay claims. Moreover, this study attempted to combine methods and common threads currently in use to assist in delay claims analysis.
[1]
Saied Kartam.
Generic Methodology for Analyzing Delay Claims
,
1999
.
[2]
Sabah Alkass,et al.
Construction delay analysis techniques
,
1996
.
[3]
David Arditi,et al.
Analysis Methods in Time-Based Claims
,
2008
.
[4]
Janet K. Yates,et al.
Avoiding and Minimizing Construction Delay Claim Disputes in Relational Contracting
,
2006
.
[5]
Ronald Gulezian,et al.
Baseline Determination in Construction Labor Productivity-Loss Claims
,
2003
.
[6]
W. Mendenhall,et al.
Statistics for engineering and the sciences
,
1984
.
[7]
Sabah Alkass,et al.
Construction contractor's claims analysis: An integrated system approach
,
1991
.