"Phonetic bases of distinctive features": Introduction

Distinctive features have long been involved in the study of spoken language, and in one form or another remain central to the study of phonological patterning within and across languages. However, their phonetic nature as well as their role in mental representation, speech production and speech processing has been a matter of less agreement. Many phoneticians consider features to be too abstract for the purposes of phonetic study, and have tended to explore alternative models for representing speech (e.g., gestures, prototypes, exemplars). Psycholinguists, too, have sometimes hesitated to integrate features into their models, often preferring to work with traditional phonetic categories, segments, or syllables. The resulting breach between the representational categories of phonology on the one hand and those of the experimental speech sciences on the other has tended to increase the gap between phonology, phonetics and psycholinguistics, challenging the underpinnings of the movement to reintegrate these approaches (Laboratory Phonology). Compounding this problem is the fact that much of the experimentalist's under- standing of features is still based on largely outdated theories of thirty or forty years ago, due in large part to the absence of accessible recent overviews of the subject. It would therefore seem useful to provide an up-to-date overview of the phonetic bases of distinctive feature theory as it is conceived at the present time. The papers collected in this issue emanate, for the most part, from a conference on the theme ''Phonetic Bases of Distinctive Features''heldattheCarre desSciences,MinisteﰀreDe le gue dela Recherche, Paris, on July 3, 2006. This conference gathered a number of specialists from several disciplines within linguistics and the speech sciences to exchange views on the phonetic bases of distinctive features from a variety of perspectives. The larger goal was to address current issues in feature theory and to take a step towards synthesizing recent advances in order to present a current ''state of the art'' of the field. These brief introductory remarks will attempt to lay out the theme as it was addressed by the conference participants.

[1]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[2]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures , 1990 .

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes , 1988 .

[4]  E. Moreton Structural constraints in the perception of English stop-sonorant clusters , 2002, Cognition.

[5]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks , 2000, Phonetica.

[6]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Enhancement and Overlap in the Speech Chain , 2006 .

[7]  John Coleman,et al.  Discovering the acoustic correlates of phonological contrasts , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[8]  Sabine Zerbian The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology , 2008 .

[9]  J. Segui,et al.  Where Is the /b/ in “absurde” [apsyrd]? It Is in French Listeners' Minds , 2000 .

[10]  D. Steriade,et al.  What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions , 2007, Cognition.

[11]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[12]  Chin-Wu Kim On the Autonomy of the Tensity Feature in Stop Classification (with Special Reference to Korean Stops) , 1965 .

[13]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[14]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some Experiments on the Perception of Synthetic Speech Sounds , 1952 .

[15]  Catherine T Best,et al.  Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: a cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/l/ clusters. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M. Pitt,et al.  Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  M. Halle From Memory to Speech and Back: Papers on Phonetics and Phonology 1954 - 2002 , 2003 .

[18]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[19]  D. Massaro,et al.  Phonological context in speech perception , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revisited , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Kiyoshi Honda,et al.  Automaticity vs. feature-enhancement in the control of segmental F0 , 2011 .

[22]  A. Liberman,et al.  The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  George N. Clements,et al.  Feature economy in sound systems , 2003, Phonology.

[24]  P. Denes On the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1965 .

[25]  J Kingston,et al.  The Phonetics and Phonology of Perceptually Motivated Articulatory Covariation , 1992, Language and speech.

[26]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Jeff Mielke,et al.  The Emergence of Distinctive Features , 2008 .

[28]  J. Mehler,et al.  Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[29]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? , 1998 .

[30]  P. Keating Underspecification in Phonetics , 1988, Phonology.

[31]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Features in Speech Perception and Lexical Access , 2008 .

[32]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[33]  J. Mehler,et al.  New evidence for prelexical phonological processing in word recognition , 2001 .

[34]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The Dispersion-Focalization Theory of vowel systems , 1997 .

[35]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[36]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .

[37]  L. Lisker “Voicing” in English: A Catalogue of Acoustic Features Signaling /b/ Versus /p/ in Trochees , 1986, Language and speech.

[38]  K. Stevens,et al.  A Note on Laryngeal Features , 2003 .

[39]  George N. Clements The role of features in speech sound inventories , 2009 .

[40]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[41]  M. Halle,et al.  Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates , 1961 .

[42]  R L Diehl,et al.  The Role of Phonetics within the Study of Language , 1991, Phonetica.

[43]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Influence of syllable-coda voicing on the acoustic properties of syllable-onset /l/ in English , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[44]  K. Stevens,et al.  Primary Features and Their Enhancement in Consonants , 1989 .