The Benefits and Pitfalls of Social Capital: Empirical Evidence from Two Organizations in the United Kingdom†

Recently, there has been a shift in the way management scholars view the firm, from traditional models that are based on ideas of opportunism and market failure to newer knowledge-based theories that argue for a more socialized perspective. One of the key components of these theories is the notion of social capital. Social capital is the set of resources that accrue to an individual or group by virtue of their social connections. As such, it is a resource that is jointly owned. Most recent research adopts a more-is-better approach to social capital, suggesting that individuals with larger quantity of ties derive more positive benefits. However in this paper, we argue that using social capital has both benefits and drawbacks for organizations, and that these positive and negative aspects of social capital occur simultaneously. To substantiate our claim, we use data collected from sets of interviews with senior and middle managers in two organizations in the United Kingdom. Our findings indicate that while social capital has many beneficial effects with respect to information access and retrieval, community building, and underlying group norms, there are also a number of less-beneficial aspects, which are under-explored in the current empirical literature. Furthermore, we suggest that organizations must develop an understanding of the bridging and bonding elements of social capital, as these are critical for its implementation. Implications of the research findings and future research directions are discussed.

[1]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[2]  J. Lincoln,et al.  Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relational Networks , 1979 .

[3]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[4]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[5]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[6]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Homogeneity in confiding relations , 1988 .

[7]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[10]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[11]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[12]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  R. Putnam.  The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[14]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[15]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[16]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Social Capital at the Top: Effects of Social Similarity and Status on CEO Compensation , 1996 .

[17]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[18]  A. Portes,et al.  The downside of social capital , 1996 .

[19]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  VALUE CREATION BY FIRMS. , 1996 .

[20]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[21]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[22]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[23]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[24]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[25]  M. Arthur,et al.  Paradox in Project-Based Enterprise: The Case of Film Making , 1998 .

[26]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[27]  Rebecca L. Sandefur,et al.  A PARADIGM FOR SOCIAL CAPITAL , 1998 .

[28]  Matthew S. Kraatz.  Learning by Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change , 1998 .

[29]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[30]  Niels G. Noorderhaven,et al.  Some Reservations About Social Capital , 1999 .

[31]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[32]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[33]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation , 2000 .

[34]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  The Social Capital of French and American Managers , 2000 .

[35]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages , 2000 .

[36]  Erika Hayes James,et al.  Race-Related Differences in Promotions and Support: Underlying Effects of Human and Social Capital , 2000 .

[37]  Isabelle Bouty.  Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[38]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital , 2000 .

[39]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[40]  Roberto M. Fernandez,et al.  Social Capital at Work: Networks and Employment at a Phone Center , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[42]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[43]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[44]  Sue Newell,et al.  'Best practice' development and transfer in the NHS: the importance of process as well as product knowledge , 2003, Health services management research.