Reviews and Syntheses: optical sampling of the flux tower footprint

Abstract. The purpose of this review is to address the reasons and methods for conducting optical remote sensing within the flux tower footprint. Fundamental principles and conclusions gleaned from over 2 decades of proximal remote sensing at flux tower sites are reviewed. The organizing framework used here is the light-use efficiency (LUE) model, both because it is widely used, and because it provides a useful theoretical construct for integrating optical remote sensing with flux measurements. Multiple ways of driving this model, ranging from meteorological measurements to remote sensing, have emerged in recent years, making it a convenient conceptual framework for comparative experimental studies. New interpretations of established optical sampling methods, including the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), are discussed within the context of the LUE model. Multi-scale analysis across temporal and spatial axes is a central theme because such scaling can provide links between ecophysiological mechanisms detectable at the level of individual organisms and broad patterns emerging at larger scales, enabling evaluation of emergent properties and extrapolation to the flux footprint and beyond. Proper analysis of the sampling scale requires an awareness of sampling context that is often essential to the proper interpretation of optical signals. Additionally, the concept of optical types, vegetation exhibiting contrasting optical behavior in time and space, is explored as a way to frame our understanding of the controls on surface–atmosphere fluxes. Complementary normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and PRI patterns across ecosystems are offered as an example of this hypothesis, with the LUE model and light-response curve providing an integrating framework. I conclude that experimental approaches allowing systematic exploration of plant optical behavior in the context of the flux tower network provides a unique way to improve our understanding of environmental constraints and ecophysiological function. In addition to an enhanced mechanistic understanding of ecosystem processes, this integration of remote sensing with flux measurements offers many rich opportunities for upscaling, satellite validation, and informing practical management objectives ranging from assessing ecosystem health and productivity to quantifying biospheric carbon sequestration.

[1]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Photochemical reflectance index as an indirect estimator of foliar isoprenoid emissions at the ecosystem level , 2013, Nature Communications.

[2]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Physiological responses of a black spruce forest to weather , 1997 .

[3]  Jan U.H. Eitel,et al.  Disentangling the relationships between plant pigments and the photochemical reflectance index reveals a new approach for remote estimation of carotenoid content , 2011 .

[4]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Facultative and constitutive pigment effects on the Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) in sun and shade conifer needles , 2012 .

[5]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  An Optical Sensor Network for Vegetation Phenology Monitoring and Satellite Data Calibration , 2011, Sensors.

[6]  N. Coops,et al.  Instrumentation and approach for unattended year round tower based measurements of spectral reflectance , 2007 .

[7]  Steven F. Oberbauer,et al.  Remote sensing of tundra gross ecosystem productivity and light use efficiency under varying temperature and moisture conditions , 2010 .

[8]  Damiano Gianelle,et al.  SpecNet revisited: bridging flux and remote sensing communities , 2010 .

[9]  J. Townshend,et al.  African Land-Cover Classification Using Satellite Data , 1985, Science.

[10]  Bartholomew Elias,et al.  Pilotless Drones: Background and Considerations for Congress Regarding Unmanned Aircraft Operations in the National Airspace System , 2012 .

[11]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Effects of irradiance and photosynthetic downregulation on the photochemical reflectance index in Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine , 2013 .

[12]  S. Goetz,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of surface energy balance : success, failures, and unresolved issues in FIFE , 1992 .

[13]  O. Björkman,et al.  Chloroplast movements in leaves: Influence on chlorophyll fluorescence and measurements of light-induced absorbance changes related to ΔpH and zeaxanthin formation , 1992, Photosynthesis Research.

[14]  A. Gitelson,et al.  The need for a common basis for defining light-use efficiency: Implications for productivity estimation , 2015 .

[15]  Park S. Nobel,et al.  Physiological Plant Ecology I: Responses to the Physical Environment , 1981 .

[16]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[17]  P. Sellers.  Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis, and transpiration. II. the role of biophysics in the linearity of their interdependence , 1987 .

[18]  John A Gamon,et al.  Three causes of variation in the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) in evergreen conifers. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[19]  Susan L Ustin,et al.  Remote sensing of plant functional types. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[20]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[21]  Petya K. E. Campbell,et al.  Arctic Tundra Vegetation Functional Types Based on Photosynthetic Physiology and Optical Properties , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[22]  K. Winter,et al.  Photoinhibition and zeaxanthin formation in intact leaves : a possible role of the xanthophyll cycle in the dissipation of excess light energy. , 1987, Plant physiology.

[23]  John A. Gamon,et al.  A mobile tram system for systematic sampling of ecosystem optical properties , 2006 .

[24]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Leaf optical properties reflect variation in photosynthetic metabolism and its sensitivity to temperature , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[25]  John A Gamon,et al.  The photochemical reflectance index provides an optical indicator of spring photosynthetic activation in evergreen conifers. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[26]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves , 1981, Planta.

[27]  D. Sims,et al.  Estimation of vegetation water content and photosynthetic tissue area from spectral reflectance: a comparison of indices based on liquid water and chlorophyll absorption features , 2003 .

[28]  T Vesala,et al.  Flux and concentration footprint modelling: state of the art. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[29]  C. Tucker,et al.  North American vegetation patterns observed with the NOAA-7 advanced very high resolution radiometer , 1985, Vegetatio.

[30]  J. Monteith.  Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[31]  Raymond F. Kokaly,et al.  EO-1 Hyperion Re(cid:2)ectance Time Series at Calibration and Validation Sites: Stability and Sensitivity to Seasonal Dynamics , 2014 .

[32]  C. Osmond,et al.  Ecology of Photosynthesis in the Sun and Shade: Summary and Prognostications , 1988 .

[33]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  Patterns and controls of the variability of radiation use efficiency and primary productivity across terrestrial ecosystems , 2010 .

[34]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[35]  C. Field,et al.  A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme , 1992 .

[36]  Gérard Dedieu,et al.  Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data , 1994 .

[37]  B. Demmig‐Adams,et al.  Regulation of Photosynthetic Light Energy Capture, Conversion, and Dissipation in Leaves of Higher Plants , 1994 .

[38]  P. North,et al.  Remote sensing of canopy light use efficiency using the photochemical reflectance index , 2001 .

[39]  D. Paslier,et al.  Net Exchange of CO2 in a Mid-Latitude Forest , 1993, Science.

[40]  Michele Meroni,et al.  Ground-Based Optical Measurements at European Flux Sites: A Review of Methods, Instruments and Current Controversies , 2011, Sensors.

[41]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Tracking seasonal drought effects on ecosystem light use efficiency with satellite-based PRI in a Mediterranean forest. , 2009 .

[42]  J. Townshend,et al.  NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale , 1994 .

[43]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Review of methods and applications , 2009 .

[44]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, scientific results, and future directions , 1997 .

[45]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Diverse Optical and Photosynthetic Properties in a Neotropical Dry Forest during the Dry Season: Implications for Remote Estimation of Photosynthesis 1 , 2005 .

[46]  D. Sims,et al.  Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages , 2002 .

[47]  G. J. Collatz,et al.  Comparison of Radiative and Physiological Effects of Doubled Atmospheric CO2 on Climate , 1996, Science.

[48]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity , 2011, Geophysical Research Letters.

[49]  Elizabeth M. Middleton,et al.  Regional mapping of gross light-use efficiency using MODIS spectral indices , 2008 .

[50]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Optical sampling of the flux tower footprint , 2015 .

[51]  H. Jones.  Plants and Microclimate: Other environmental factors: wind, altitude, climate change and atmospheric pollutants , 2013 .

[52]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  REMOTE ESTIMATION OF GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN MAIZE , 2011 .

[53]  M. Reichstein,et al.  Partitioning of Net Fluxes , 2012 .

[54]  C. Field,et al.  Relationships Between NDVI, Canopy Structure, and Photosynthesis in Three Californian Vegetation Types , 1995 .

[55]  D. Roberts,et al.  Using Imaging Spectroscopy to Study Ecosystem Processes and Properties , 2004 .

[56]  Rasmus Houborg,et al.  Thermal-based modeling of coupled carbon, water, and energy fluxes using nominal light use efficiencies constrained by leaf chlorophyll observations , 2014 .

[57]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Monitoring seasonal and diurnal changes in photosynthetic pigments with automated PRI and NDVI sensors , 2015 .

[58]  J. Moreno,et al.  Remote sensing of sun‐induced fluorescence to improve modeling of diurnal courses of gross primary production (GPP) , 2010 .

[59]  S. Long,et al.  Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[60]  J. Norman,et al.  Predicting Canopy Light-Use Efficiency from Leaf Characteristics , 1991 .

[61]  Zhongmin Hu,et al.  Comparison of four light use efficiency models for estimating terrestrial gross primary production , 2015 .

[62]  Rocchina Guarini,et al.  The utility of MODIS-sPRI for investigating the photosynthetic light-use efficiency in a Mediterranean deciduous forest , 2014 .

[63]  A. Kerkhoff,et al.  Convergence of terrestrial plant production across global climate gradients , 2014, Nature.

[64]  C. Field,et al.  A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency , 1992 .

[65]  J. Gamon,et al.  The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels , 1997, Oecologia.

[66]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Remote sensing of photosynthetic light-use efficiency across two forested biomes: Spatial scaling , 2010 .

[67]  M. Schildhauer,et al.  Spectral Network (SpecNet)—What is it and why do we need it? , 2006 .

[68]  J. Berry,et al.  Models of fluorescence and photosynthesis for interpreting measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2014, Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences.

[69]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Retrieval of foliar information about plant pigment systems from high resolution spectroscopy , 2009 .

[70]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Linking foliage spectral responses to canopy-level ecosystem photosynthetic light-use efficiency at a Douglas-fir forest in Canada , 2009 .

[71]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Tracking plant physiological properties from multi-angular tower-based remote sensing , 2011, Oecologia.

[72]  L. Guanter,et al.  The seasonal cycle of satellite chlorophyll fluorescence observations and its relationship to vegetation phenology and ecosystem atmosphere carbon exchange , 2014 .

[73]  Gilberto Pastorello,et al.  Retrieval of the photochemical reflectance index for assessing xanthophyll cycle activity: a comparison of near-surface optical sensors , 2014 .

[74]  Karl Fred Huemmrich,et al.  High temporal resolution NDVI phenology from micrometeorological radiation sensors , 1999 .

[75]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A thermal-based remote sensing technique for routine mapping of land-surface carbon, water and energy fluxes from field to regional scales , 2008 .

[76]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  The photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and the remote sensing of leaf, canopy and ecosystem radiation use efficiencies: A review and meta-analysis , 2011 .

[77]  Gregory A. Carter,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence measured using the Fraunhofer line‐depth principle and relationship to photosynthetic rate in the field , 1990 .

[78]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Assessment of photosynthetic radiation‐use efficiency with spectral reflectance , 1995 .

[79]  George Burba,et al.  A brief practical guide to eddy covariance flux measurements: Principles and workflow examples for s , 2010 .

[80]  W. Verhoef,et al.  An integrated model of soil-canopy spectral radiances, photosynthesis, fluorescence, temperature and energy balance , 2009 .

[81]  W. Oechel,et al.  Parallel adjustments in vegetation greenness and ecosystem CO2 exchange in response to drought in a Southern California chaparral ecosystem , 2006 .

[82]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Effects of diffuse radiation on canopy gas exchange processes in a forest ecosystem , 2008 .

[83]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[84]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Remote sensing of the xanthophyll cycle and chlorophyll fluorescence in sunflower leaves and canopies , 1990, Oecologia.

[85]  Andrew D Richardson,et al.  Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[86]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Assessing photosynthetic downregulation in sunflower stands with an optically-based model , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[87]  P. Sellers,et al.  The First ISLSCP Field Experiment (FIFE) , 1988 .

[88]  K. Soudani,et al.  Relationships between photochemical reflectance index and light-use efficiency in deciduous and evergreen broadleaf forests , 2014 .

[89]  C. Osmond,et al.  Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series. Volume 12A. Physiological plant ecology I. Reponses to the physical environment. , 1981 .

[90]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer , 1999 .

[91]  J. Norman,et al.  Predicting Canopy Photosynthesis and Light‐Use Efficiency from Leaf Characteristics , 2015 .

[92]  T. A. Black,et al.  Separating physiologically and directionally induced changes in PRI using BRDF models , 2008 .

[93]  H. Walz.  Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges , 2014 .

[94]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[95]  T. Arkebauer,et al.  Detection and measurement of vegetation photoprotection stress response using PAR reflectance , 2012 .