Resilience in the light of energy crises – Part II: Application of the regional energy resilience assessment

The secure and affordable provision of energy considering social and climate goals poses a major challenge as studies confirm that global energy consumption and the dependency on fossil fuels increase annually. This leads to unwanted global uncertainties, interdependencies and environmental impacts due to the limitedness and unevenly distributed fossil energy carriers, accompanied by carbon based emissions due to fossil fuel combustion. To ensure the viability of our energy system, we need to increase resilience of our energy services: the protection and preservation of energy and infrastructure dependent basic needs of living within an energy region despite an irreversible decline in fossil energy. For this purpose, a novel step-by-step resilience assessment (RERA) is introduced, aiming to operationalise and promote regional energy resilience. First, we examine sectors and energy services being affected by fossil energy constraints and their need for improvements (factual level assessment). Secondly, attitudes and risk sensitivity referring to energy crises are surveyed to reveal community awareness and the acceptance of needed improvement measures (value level assessment). Thirdly, both levels are compared to identify key aspects for planning a resilient energy system. Finally, policy implications on how to integrate resilience-thinking into development efforts of our energy system will be derived.

[1]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change , 2022, The Social Contours of Risk.

[2]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[3]  M. Zessner,et al.  Ernährung und Flächennutzung in Österreich , 2011 .

[4]  R. Ison,et al.  Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation , 2009 .

[5]  Robert L. Flood,et al.  Contours of diversity management and triple loop learning , 1996 .

[6]  Petra Tschakert,et al.  Anticipatory Learning for Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience , 2010 .

[7]  S. Owens,et al.  How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy , 2008 .

[8]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[9]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole,et al.  Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications , 2007 .

[10]  Susanna Erker,et al.  Resilience in the light of energy crises – Part I: A framework to conceptualise regional energy resilience , 2017 .

[11]  K. Kotschy.  Biodiversity, redundancy and resilience of riparian vegetation under different land management regimes. , 2014 .

[12]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies , 1994 .

[13]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[14]  P. Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, European Journal of Operational Research.

[15]  P. H. Lindsay,et al.  Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology , 1972 .

[16]  L. Kranzl,et al.  Measuring regional resilience towards fossil fuel supply constraints. Adaptability and vulnerability in socio-ecological Transformations-the case of Austria , 2016 .

[17]  A. Wroblewski,et al.  "Kulturwandel zur geschlechtergerechten Wissenschafts- und Forschungslandschaft 2025" ; Endbericht ; Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft (BMWFW) , 2014 .

[18]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Harnessing expert-based information for learning and the sustainable management of complex socio-ecological systems , 2010 .

[19]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[20]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .