Utilization of BRCA 1 / BRCA 2 Mutation Testing in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients

Background: Among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who are at risk for carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, knowledge of mutation status can influence local breast cancer treatment decisions. Thus, genetic testing at the time of diagnosis is increasingly considered an option for such patients. In this study, we evaluated factors associated with the decision to undergo BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing at the time of initial breast cancer diagnosis. Methods: Participants were newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who had not yet received definitive local breast cancer treatment and who had a family history consistent with hereditary breast cancer. Participants were offered genetic counseling and BRCA1/BRCA2 testing with results in 2 to 3 weeks. Results: Of 231 patients who referred to the study, 20 (9%) declined the baseline interview, 34 (15%) completed a baseline interview but declined genetic testing, and 177 (76%) underwent BRCA1/BRCA2 testing. Physician recommendation for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing and indecision about definitive local treatment were both associated with undergoing testing. Among patients who were tested, 38 (21%) proceeded with definitive local treatment before receiving test results. Delay in the availability of test results and low levels of anxiety were associated with the decision to proceed with definitive local treatment before receiving test results. Conclusions: These results suggest that if rapid testing is available and genetic referrals are made for appropriate patients, a high proportion are likely to opt for such testing. In particular, patients who have not yet reached a decision about definitive local treatment may benefit from a genetic referral. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14(4): 1003–7)

[1]  M. Daly Tailoring breast cancer treatment to genetic status: the challenges ahead. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  J. Weitzel,et al.  Effect of genetic cancer risk assessment on surgical decisions at breast cancer diagnosis. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[3]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 28-2003. A 51-year-old premenopausal woman with newly diagnosed breast cancer and a strong family history of breast cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P. Glazer,et al.  Outcome of conservatively managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status , 2002, The Lancet.

[6]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  B. Peshkin,et al.  Across the Spectrum: Case Studies in Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer , 2001, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[8]  P. Lantz,et al.  Correlates of surgical treatment type for women with noninvasive and invasive breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[9]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Effects of coping style and BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results on anxiety among women participating in genetic counseling and testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. , 2001, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[10]  L. Crane,et al.  Physician sex and other factors associated with type of breast cancer surgery in older women. , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[11]  O. Olopade,et al.  Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving treatment in women with breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  H T Lynch,et al.  Genetic testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. , 1999, JAMA.

[13]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[14]  S. Cummings,et al.  Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  J Chang-Claude,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The influence of psychological distress on use of genetic testing for cancer risk , 1997 .

[17]  P. Hartge,et al.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  F. Couch,et al.  BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  D S Tulsky,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  W. Thompson,et al.  The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer , 1996, Cancer.

[21]  D. Bentley,et al.  Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 , 1995, Nature.

[22]  B. Rimer,et al.  Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[24]  D. Easton,et al.  Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers , 1994, The Lancet.

[25]  D. Tulsky,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress , 1979, Psychosomatic medicine.

[27]  D. Berry,et al.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  A. Baum,et al.  Stress and genetic testing for disease risk. , 1997, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[29]  J. E. Nash,et al.  Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings. , 1997, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[30]  D. Easton,et al.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  Karen Glanz,et al.  Psychosocial Impact of Breast Cancer: A Critical Review , 1992, Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

[32]  H T Lynch,et al.  Hereditary breast cancer. , 1991, Annals of medicine.

[33]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[34]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[35]  C. Spielberger,et al.  STAI manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory ("self-evaluation questionnaire") , 1970 .