Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system

AIMS To map the thickness, elevation (anterior and posterior corneal surface), and axial curvature of the cornea in normal eyes with the Orbscan corneal topography system. METHODS 94 eyes of 51 normal subjects were investigated using the Orbscan corneal topography system. The anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps were classified into regular ridge, irregular ridge, incomplete ridge, island, and unclassified patterns, and the axial power maps were grouped into round, oval, symmetric bow tie, asymmetric bow tie, and irregular patterns. The pachymetry patterns were designated as round, oval, decentred round, and decentred oval. RESULTS The thinnest point on the cornea was located at an average of 0.90 (SD 0.51) mm from visual axis and had an average thickness of 0.55 (0.03) mm. In 69.57% of eyes, this point was located in the inferotemporal quadrant, followed by the superotemporal quadrant in 23.91%, the inferonasal quadrant in 4.35%, and the superonasal quadrant in 2.17%. Among the nine regions of the cornea evaluated (central, superotemporal, temporal, inferotemporal, inferior, inferonasal, nasal, superonasal, and superior) the central cornea had the lowest average thickness (0.56 (0.03) mm) and the superior cornea had the greatest average thickness (0.64 (0.03) mm). The mean simulated keratometry (SimK) was 44.24 (1.61)/43.31 (1.66) dioptres (D) and the mean astigmatism was 0.90 (0.41) D. Island (71.74%) was the most common elevation pattern observed in the anterior corneal surface, followed by incomplete ridge (19.57%), regular ridge (4.34%), irregular ridge (2.17%), and unclassified (2.17%). Island (32.61%) was the most common topographic pattern in the posterior corneal surface, following by regular ridge (30.43%), incomplete ridge (23.91%), and irregular ridge (13.04%) patterns. Symmetric bow tie was the most common axial power pattern in the anterior cornea (39.13%), followed by oval (26.07%), asymmetric bow tie (23.91%), round (6.52%), and irregular (4.53%) patterns. In the pachymetry maps, 47.83% of eyes had an oval pattern, and round, decentred oval, and decentred round were observed in 41.30%, 8.70%, and 2.18% of eyes, respectively. CONCLUSION The information on regional corneal thickness, corneal elevation and axial corneal curvature obtained with the Orbscan corneal topography system from normal eyes provides a reference for comparison with diseased corneas. The Orbscan corneal topography system is a useful tool to evaluate both corneal topography and corneal thickness.

[1]  W. Argus,et al.  Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[2]  S. Naufal,et al.  Rasterstereography‐based classification of normal corneas , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Gerd U. Auffarth,et al.  Measuring anterior chamber depth with the Orbscan Topography System , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  K A Polse,et al.  In vivo assessment of mechanisms controlling corneal hydration. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  W M Petroll,et al.  Measurement of Surgically Induced Corneal Deformations Using Three-Dimensional Confocal Microscopy , 1996, Cornea.

[6]  S. Klyce,et al.  Advances in the analysis of corneal topography. , 1991, Survey of ophthalmology.

[7]  S P Azen,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of sources of variability in the measurement of corneal thickness with ultrasonic and optical pachymeters. , 1983, Ophthalmic surgery.

[8]  F. Campbell,et al.  Study of human precorneal tear film thickness and structure using laser interferometry. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  C. Edmund,et al.  Posterior corneal curvature and its influence on corneal dioptric power , 1994, Acta ophthalmologica.

[10]  C K Hitzenberger,et al.  Interferometric measurement of corneal thickness with micrometer precision. , 1994, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  M. Lynn,et al.  Comparison of ultrasonic corneal thickness measurements before and during surgery in the prospective evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. , 1986, Ophthalmology.

[12]  A Boyde,et al.  Tandem‐Scanning (Confocal) Microscopy of the Full‐Thickness Cornea , 1985, Cornea.

[13]  H W Thompson,et al.  Corneal thickness measurements with the Orbscan Topography System and ultrasonic pachymetry , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[14]  T. Cox,et al.  Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  T. Palomar,et al.  Central and peripheral corneal thickness in full-term newborns by ultrasonic pachymetry. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  J L Cambier,et al.  PAR Corneal Topography System (PAR CTS): the clinical application of close-range photogrammetry. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  G O Waring,et al.  Classification of normal corneal topography based on computer-assisted videokeratography. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  D. Maurice,et al.  Automatic recording of corneal thickness in vitro. , 1976, Investigative ophthalmology.

[19]  K R Kenyon,et al.  The Corneal Endothelium , 1982 .

[20]  D. Litoff,et al.  The PAR Technology Corneal Topography System. , 1992, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[21]  A. Bates,et al.  Positive correlation of corneal thickness and endothelial cell loss. Serial measurements after cataract surgery. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  C W Fowler,et al.  Review of past and present techniques of measuring corneal topography , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.