Modeling and performance assessment of Pd- and Pd/Au-based catalytic membrane reactors for hydrogen production

A mathematical steady-state modeling framework for the isothermal operation of a membrane reactor for methane steam reforming is developed, and a comparative performance assessment of the catalytic membrane reactor (CMR) versus a conventional packed bed reactor (PBR) is accordingly conducted. A detailed literature benchmarking suggests that the models developed in the present study predict total methane conversion levels within 99% of the experimental values reported in the literature. The proposed Pd- and Pd/Au-based CMR model is utilized for the aforementioned performance analysis under a broad range of reactor operating conditions such as temperature (350–750 °C), pressure (2–30 bars), steam to methane ratio (1–15), membrane thickness (1–50 µm), and permeate-side sweep ratio (1–100). In all simulation runs conducted, the superior performance of both the Pd- and Pd/Au-based CMR over the PBR was amply demonstrated. Furthermore, within the proposed CMR modeling framework, an index-based analysis is conducted that concretely quantifies progress towards the attainment of key process intensification objectives. In particular, by appropriately defining the Δ-index, which explicitly captures potential performance and process intensification benefits associated with attainable total CH4 conversion levels under different reactor operating conditions, it is shown that the optimum CMR performance is achieved at high pressure and low temperature operating conditions, which was particularly suitable for the attainment of key process intensification objectives as well as optimum performance target levels.

[1]  D. Borio,et al.  Kinetic evaluation of carbon formation in a membrane reactor for methane reforming , 2007 .

[2]  R. H. Williams,et al.  Inorganic membranes for hydrogen production and purification: a critical review and perspective. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[3]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  New Metrics for Evaluating the Performance of Membrane Operations in the Logic of Process Intensification , 2007 .

[4]  Yi Hua Ma,et al.  Synthesis of composite Pd-porous stainless steel (PSS) membranes with a Pd/Ag intermetallic diffusion barrier , 2006 .

[5]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Targeting Techniques for Enhancing Process Yield , 2006 .

[6]  E. Drioli,et al.  An Exergetic Analysis of Membrane Unit Operations Integrated in the Ethylene Production Cycle , 2006 .

[7]  Fabiano A.N. Fernandes,et al.  Methane steam reforming modeling in a palladium membrane reactor , 2006 .

[8]  S. Chan,et al.  Kinetic and modelling study of methane steam reforming over sulfide nickel catalyst on a gamma alumina support , 2005 .

[9]  P. Ferreira-Aparicio,et al.  Catalysis in membrane reformers: a high-performance catalytic system for hydrogen production from methane , 2005 .

[10]  Hiroyuki Suda,et al.  Experimental Study of Steam Reforming of Methane in a Thin (6 μM) Pd-Based Membrane Reactor , 2005 .

[11]  B. Morreale,et al.  Effect of hydrogen-sulfide on the hydrogen permeance of palladium–copper alloys at elevated temperatures , 2004 .

[12]  Y. Ma,et al.  Characterization of Intermetallic Diffusion Barrier and Alloy Formation for Pd/Cu and Pd/Ag Porous Stainless Steel Composite Membranes , 2004 .

[13]  Fausto Gallucci,et al.  A simulation study of the steam reforming of methane in a dense tubular membrane reactor , 2004 .

[14]  E. Drioli,et al.  Membrane contactors and catalytic membrane reactors in process intensification , 2003 .

[15]  Juliana Piña,et al.  Use of a heterogeneous two-dimensional model to improve the primary steam reformer performance , 2003 .

[16]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Equilibrium conversion for a Pd-based membrane reactor. Dependence on the temperature and pressure , 2003 .

[17]  E. Drioli.  Process intensification using membrane systems , 2003 .

[18]  B. Morreale,et al.  The permeability of hydrogen in bulk palladium at elevated temperatures and pressures , 2003 .

[19]  N. Itoh,et al.  Efficient Hydrogen Production via Methanol Steam Reforming by Preventing Back-permeation of Hydrogen in a Palladium Membrane Reactor , 2002 .

[20]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Effect of energy transport on a palladium-based membrane reactor for methane steam reforming process , 2001 .

[21]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Conversion−Temperature Diagram for a Palladium Membrane Reactor. Analysis of an Endothermic Reaction: Methane Steam Reforming , 2001 .

[22]  R. Hughes,et al.  The kinetics of methane steam reforming over a Ni/α-Al2O catalyst , 2001 .

[23]  V. Gryaznov.  METAL CONTAINING MEMBRANES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ULTRAPURE HYDROGEN AND THE RECOVERY OF HYDROGEN ISOTOPES , 2000 .

[24]  Eiichi Kikuchi,et al.  Membrane reactor application to hydrogen production , 2000 .

[25]  R. Hughes,et al.  A simulative comparison of dense and microporous membrane reactors for the steam reforming of methane , 1998 .

[26]  Yi Hua Ma,et al.  Defect‐free palladium membranes on porous stainless‐steel support , 1998 .

[27]  R. Dittmeyer,et al.  Mathematical simulation of catalytic dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene in a composite palladium membrane reactor , 1997 .

[28]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Methane Steam Reforming Analysis in a Palladium-Based Catalytic Membrane Reactor , 1997 .

[29]  P. Nielsen,et al.  Steam reforming of methane in a membrane reactor , 1995 .

[30]  Bernard P. A. Grandjean,et al.  Methane steam reforming in asymmetric Pd- and Pd-Ag/porous SS membrane reactors , 1994 .

[31]  Bernard P. A. Grandjean,et al.  Catalytic palladium‐based membrane reactors: A review , 1991 .

[32]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[33]  Johannes Schmitz,et al.  Steam reforming of natural gas with intergrated hydrogen separation for hydrogen production , 1987 .

[34]  F. L. Ribe,et al.  Atomic Energy Commission , 1966, Nature.