Independence Threats, Litigation Risk, and the Auditor's Decision Process

This study examines the effect of independence threats and litigation risk on auditors' evaluation of information and subsequent reporting choices. Using a Web-based experiment, I tracked auditors' information gathering and evaluation leading to a going-concern reporting decision. Specifically, forty-eight audit managers assessed client survival likelihood, gathered additional information, and suggested audit report choices. I found that auditors facing high independence threats (fear of losing the client) evaluated information as more indicative of a surviving client and were more likely to suggest an unmodified audit report, consistent with client preferences. In contrast, auditors facing high litigation risk evaluated information as more indicative of a failing client and were more likely to suggest a modified audit report. In addition, the association between risk and report choice was fully mediated by final information evaluation. This suggests that it is unlikely that different reporting choices resulted from a conscious choice bias but rather that motivated reasoning during evidence evaluation plays a key role in the effect of risk in auditor decision-making.

[1]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Debiasing Audit Judgment With Accountability - A Framework And Experimental Results , 1993 .

[2]  Ping Zhang.  A Bargaining Model of Auditor Reporting , 1999 .

[3]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More Is Needed , 1997 .

[4]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational Influences on Impression Formation: Outcome Dependency, Accuracy-Driven Attention, and Individuating Processes , 1987 .

[5]  Ram S. Sriram,et al.  A Comparison of Selected Artificial Neural Networks that Help Auditors Evaluate Client Financial Viability , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[6]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Predecisional Distortion of Information by Auditors and Salespersons , 2000 .

[7]  Kathryn Kadous,et al.  The Effect of Quality Assessment and Directional Goal Commitment on Auditors' Acceptance of Client‐Preferred Accounting Methods , 2003 .

[8]  Terry D. Warfield,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Independence Risk: Framework for Analysis , 2001 .

[9]  D. Hirst,et al.  Auditors Sensitivity To Source Reliability , 1994 .

[10]  Marilyn F. Johnson,et al.  The Relation between Auditors' Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management , 2002 .

[11]  D. Larcker,et al.  Corporate Governance, Fees for Non-Audit Services and Accrual Choices , 2003 .

[12]  Linda DeAngelo,et al.  Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation , 1981 .

[13]  William F. Messier,et al.  Sequential auditor decision making: Information search and evidence evaluation* , 1990 .

[14]  Sanjay Kallapur,et al.  Client Importance, Nonaudit Services, and Abnormal Accruals , 2003 .

[15]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Threshold adjustment in response to asymmetric loss functions: The case of auditors' substantial doubt thresholds , 2002 .

[16]  R. Prislin,et al.  Motivated Cognitive Processing and Attitude Change , 1998 .

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Theodore J. Mock,et al.  An Investigation Of Auditor Decision-Processes In The Evaluation Of Internal Controls And Audit Scope Decisions , 1983 .

[19]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Social Cognition: Making Sense of People , 1999 .

[20]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  An investigation of independent audit opinions and subsequent independent auditor litigation of publicly-traded failed savings and loans , 1997 .

[21]  R. Magee,et al.  Audit Pricing and Independence , 1990 .

[22]  R. Watts,et al.  Lawsuits Against Auditors , 1994 .

[23]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight , 1982 .

[24]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients , 1994 .

[25]  P. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[26]  Kannan Raghunandan,et al.  Bankruptcies, Audit Reports, and the Reform Act , 2001 .

[27]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model , 1987 .

[28]  W. Hopwood,et al.  A Reexamination of Auditor versus Model Accuracy within the Context of the Going-Concern Opinion Decision* , 1994 .

[29]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The Distortion of Information during Decisions , 1996 .

[30]  Donald V. Moser,et al.  The effect of constrained processing on auditors’ judgments , 2003 .

[31]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  Predecisional Distortion of Product Information , 1998 .

[32]  C. Janie Chang,et al.  The Impact of Retention Incentives and Client Business Risks on Auditors' Decisions Involving Aggressive Reporting Practices , 2003 .

[33]  Preference Consistency and Preference Strength: Processing and Judgmental issues1 , 2003 .

[34]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[35]  E. Michael Bamber,et al.  An examination of the descriptive validity of the belief-adjustment model and alternative attitudes to evidence in auditing , 1997 .

[36]  Jürgen Beckmann,et al.  Deliberative versus implemental states of mind: The issue of impartiality in predecisional and postdecisional information processing , 1987 .

[37]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  A view from a bridge: Synthesizing the consistency and attribution paradigms from a lay epistemic perspective , 1987 .

[38]  Ryan LaFond,et al.  Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence , 2003 .

[39]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Who uses the cost-benefit rules of choice? implications for the normative status of microeconomic theory , 1993 .

[41]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Do Non-audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going-concern Audit Opinions , 2002 .

[42]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Evidence from Auditors About Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions , 2001 .

[43]  E. Bamber,et al.  Expert Judgment in the Audit Team: A Source Reliability Approach , 1983 .

[44]  Michael J. Ferguson,et al.  Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management: UK Evidence* , 2004 .

[45]  Jane F. Mutchler,et al.  The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies , 1997 .

[46]  Dasaratha V. Rama,et al.  Audit fees, non-audit fees, and auditor reporting on UK stressed companies , 2003 .