Assessment of surface topography modifications through feature-based registration of areal topography data

Surface topography modifications due to wear or other factors are usually investigated by visual and microscopic inspection, and—when quantitative assessment is required—through the computation of surface texture parameters. However, the current state-of-the-art areal topography measuring instruments produce detailed, areal reconstructions of surface topography which, in principle, may allow accurate comparison of the individual topographic formations before and after the modification event. The main obstacle to such an approach is registration, i.e. being able to accurately relocate the two topography datasets (measured before and after modification) in the same coordinate system. The challenge is related to the measurements being performed in independent coordinate systems, and on a surface which, having undergone modifications, may not feature easily-identifiable landmarks suitable for alignment. In this work, an algorithmic registration solution is proposed, based on the automated identification and alignment of matching topographic features. A shape descriptor (adapted from the scale invariant feature transform) is used to identify landmarks. Pairs of matching landmarks are identified by similarity of shape descriptor values. Registration is implemented by resolving the absolute orientation problem to align matched landmarks. The registration method is validated and discussed through application to simulated and real topographies selected as test cases.

[1]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[3]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices , 1988 .

[4]  Massimo Pacella,et al.  Point set augmentation through fitting for enhanced ICP registration of point clouds in multisensor coordinate metrology , 2013 .

[5]  Nicola Senin,et al.  Identification of individual features in areal surface topography data by means of template matching and the ring projection transform , 2013 .

[6]  Pawel Pawlus,et al.  Abrasive wear resistance of textured steel rings , 2009 .

[7]  Bengt-Göran Rosén,et al.  Software relocation of 3D surface topography measurements , 2001 .

[8]  Mark C. T. Wilson,et al.  Zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate antiwear tribofilm and its effect on the topography evolution of surfaces: A numerical and experimental study , 2016 .

[9]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  Uncertainty in measurement of surface topography , 2015, Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties.

[10]  Nicola Senin,et al.  Topography of selectively laser melted surfaces: A comparison of different measurement methods , 2017 .

[11]  Xiangchao Zhang,et al.  Template matching of freeform surfaces based on orthogonal distance fitting for precision metrology , 2010 .

[12]  G. Thompson,et al.  Surface topography evolution through production of aluminium offset lithographic plates , 2011 .

[13]  D. Kendall A Survey of the Statistical Theory of Shape , 1989 .

[14]  François Blateyron,et al.  The Areal Feature Parameters , 2013 .

[15]  R. Leach Optical measurement of surface topography , 2011 .

[16]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.