In vivo “hot spot” MR imaging of neural stem cells using fluorinated nanoparticles

To optimize 19F MR tracking of stem cells, we compared cellular internalization of cationic and anionic perfluoro‐15‐crown‐5‐ether (PFCE) nanoparticles using cell culture plates with different surface coatings. The viability and proliferation of anionic and cationic PFCE‐labeled neural stem cells (NSCs) did not differ from unlabeled cells. Cationic PFCE nanoparticles (19F T1/T2 = 580/536 ms at 9.4 Tesla) were superior to anionic particles for intracellular fluorination. Best results were obtained with modified polystyrene culture dishes coated with both carboxylic and amino groups rather than conventional carboxyl‐coated dishes. After injecting PFCE‐labeled NSCs into the striatum of mouse brain, cells were readily identified in vivo by 19F MRI without changes in signal or viability over a 2‐week period after grafting. These results demonstrate that neural stem cells can be efficiently fluorinated with cationic PFCE nanoparticles without using transfection agents and visualized in vivo over prolonged periods with an MR sensitivity of approximately 140 pmol of PFCE/cell. Magn Reson Med 60:1506–1511, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Jeff W M Bulte,et al.  Iron oxide MR contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging , 2004, NMR in biomedicine.

[2]  C. Cepko,et al.  Multipotent neural cell lines can engraft and participate in development of mouse cerebellum , 1992, Cell.

[3]  A. Haase,et al.  Fast 19F-NMR imaging in vivo using FLASH-MRI. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Mangala Srinivas,et al.  Fluorine‐19 MRI for visualization and quantification of cell migration in a diabetes model , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  C. Cepko,et al.  Establishment and characterization of multipotent neural cell lines using retrovirus vector-mediated oncogene transfer. , 1990, Journal of neurobiology.

[6]  Mathias Hoehn,et al.  Cellular MR Imaging , 2005, Molecular imaging.

[7]  S. Caruthers,et al.  19F magnetic resonance imaging for stem/progenitor cell tracking with multiple unique perfluorocarbon nanobeacons , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[8]  Paul A. Bottomley,et al.  19F magnetic resonance imaging , 1977 .

[9]  Eric T Ahrens,et al.  In vivo imaging platform for tracking immunotherapeutic cells , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  B. Dardzinski,et al.  Rapid tissue oxygen tension mapping using 19F inversion‐recovery echo‐planar imaging of P erfluoro‐15 ‐crown‐5‐ether , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Shelton D Caruthers,et al.  In Vitro Demonstration Using 19F Magnetic Resonance to Augment Molecular Imaging With Paramagnetic Perfluorocarbon Nanoparticles at 1.5 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[12]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Perfluoro-15-crown-5-ether labelled macrophages in adoptive transfer experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. , 1997, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[13]  Mathias Hoehn,et al.  Monitoring of implanted stem cell migration in vivo: A highly resolved in vivo magnetic resonance imaging investigation of experimental stroke in rat , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Jeff W M Bulte,et al.  Hot spot MRI emerges from the background , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Shelton D Caruthers,et al.  Targeted nanoparticles for quantitative imaging of sparse molecular epitopes with MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Patrick J. Gaffney,et al.  Quantitative “magnetic resonance immunohistochemistry” with ligand‐targeted 19F nanoparticles , 2004 .

[17]  Jeff W M Bulte,et al.  Clinically applicable labeling of mammalian and stem cells by combining superparamagnetic iron oxides and transfection agents. , 2003, Radiology.