An artificial moth: Chemical source localization using a robot based neuronal model of moth optomotor anemotactic search

Robots have been used to model nature, while nature in turn can contribute to the real-world artifacts we construct. One particular domain of interest is chemical search where a number of efforts are underway to construct mobile chemical search and localization systems. We report on a project that aims at constructing such a system based on our understanding of the pheromone communication system of the moth. Based on an overview of the peripheral processing of chemical cues by the moth and its role in the organization of behavior we emphasize the multimodal aspects of chemical search, i.e. optomotor anemotactic chemical search. We present a model of this behavior that we test in combination with a novel thin metal oxide sensor and custom build mobile robots. We show that the sensor is able to detect the odor cue, ethanol, under varying flow conditions. Subsequently we show that the standard model of insect chemical search, consisting of a surge and cast phases, provides for robust search and localization performance. The same holds when it is augmented with an optomotor collision avoidance model based on the Lobula Giant Movement Detector (LGMD) neuron of the locust. We compare our results to others who have used the moth as inspiration for the construction of odor robots.

[1]  R. Axel,et al.  A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition , 1991, Cell.

[2]  Q. Liao,et al.  The Information Content of a Scalar Plume – A Plume Tracing Perspective , 2002 .

[3]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  An Behavior-based Robotics , 1998 .

[4]  G. Shepherd,et al.  Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  A. Kolmogorov,et al.  The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  T. Baker,et al.  A pulsed cloud of sex pheromone elicits upwind flight in male moths , 1985 .

[7]  Boris I. Shraiman,et al.  Olfactory search at high Reynolds number , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  A Biologically Based Flight Control System for a Blimp-based UAV , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  IQR: a distributed system for real-time real-world neuronal simulation , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[10]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Pheromone-Regulated Anemotaxis in Flying Moths , 1974, Science.

[11]  Andreas Zell,et al.  Gas Source Tracing with a Mobile Robot Using an Adapted Moth Strategy , 2003, AMS.

[12]  Ring T. Cardé,et al.  Behavioral Responses of the Gypsy Moth in a Wind Tunnel to Air-Borne Enantiomers of Disparlure , 1979 .

[13]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Odorant-binding proteins. , 1994, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[14]  T. Baker,et al.  Pheromone Source Location by Flying Moths: A Supplementary Non-Anemotactic Mechanism , 1982, Science.

[15]  A. Ludlow,et al.  A reappraisal of insect flight towards a distant point source of wind-borne odor , 1982, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[16]  L. Buck,et al.  A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors. , 1992, Society of General Physiologists series.

[17]  R. Araneda,et al.  The molecular receptive range of an odorant receptor , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Koch,et al.  Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming , 2002, Nature.

[19]  Ryohei Kanzaki,et al.  Synthesis of the pheromone-oriented behavior of silkworm moths by a mobile robot with moth antennae as pheromone sensors , 1999 .

[20]  R. Andrew Russell,et al.  Odour Detection by Mobile Robots , 1999, World Scientific Series in Robotics and Intelligent Systems.

[21]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  A robotic platform for testing moth-inspired plume tracking strategies , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[22]  G. Batchelor.  Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  Donald R. Webster,et al.  Chemosensory guidance cues in a turbulent chemical odor plume , 2001 .

[24]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A Robust Layered Control Syste For A Mobile Robot , 2022 .

[25]  P. Simmons,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  S. Bermudez i Badia,et al.  A collision avoidance model based on the Lobula giant movement detector (LGMD) neuron of the locust , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[27]  T. Moriizumi,et al.  Controlling a gas/odor plume-tracking robot based on transient responses of gas sensors , 2005, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[28]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Using a Mobile Robot to Study Locust Collision Avoidance Responses , 1999, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[29]  A. Ludlow,et al.  Guidance of flying male moths by wind‐borne sex pheromone , 1981 .

[30]  John Murtis,et al.  Odor Plumes and How Insects Use Them , 1992 .

[31]  Peter Mombaerts,et al.  Odorant receptor gene choice in olfactory sensory neurons: the one receptor–one neuron hypothesis revisited , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  G. Schlotterer.  Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli , 1977 .

[33]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Chemotactic Search in Complex Environments , 2004 .

[34]  A. Borst,et al.  Motion computation and visual orientation in flies. , 1993, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Comparative physiology.

[35]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[36]  T. L. Payne,et al.  Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction , 1986 .

[37]  A. Ludlow,et al.  An analysis of anemotactic zigzagging flight in male moths stimulated by pheromone , 1978 .

[38]  Eric D. Siggia,et al.  Scalar turbulence , 2000, Nature.

[39]  A. Townsend,et al.  Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid Part 2. The case of large conductivity , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[40]  G. Laurent,et al.  Elementary Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field Visual Neuron , 1995, Science.

[41]  R. Cardé,et al.  Orientation of male gypsy moths,Lymantria Dispar (L.), to pheromone sources: The role of olfactory and visual cues , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[42]  S. Firestein,et al.  The olfactory receptor gene superfamily of the mouse , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Kennedy,et al.  The concepts of olfactory ‘arrestment’ and ‘attraction’ , 1978 .

[44]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  How accurate need sensory coding be for behaviour? Experiments using a mobile robot , 2001, Neurocomputing.

[45]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  Learning to locate an odour source with a mobile robot , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[46]  S. Firestein.  How the olfactory system makes sense of scents , 2001, Nature.

[47]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  A non‐anemotactic mechanism used in pheromone source location by flying moths , 1983 .

[48]  F C Rind,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. II. Critical cues for detecting approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  R. Cardé,et al.  Spatial and temporal structures of pheromone plumes in fields and forests , 2000 .

[50]  B. Ache,et al.  Towards a common strategy for transducing olfactory information. , 1994, Seminars in cell biology.

[51]  T. Baker,et al.  Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code , 2001, Nature.

[52]  Luca Turin,et al.  Structure-odor relations : a modern perspective , 2001 .

[53]  H. Ishida,et al.  Plume-Tracking Robots: A New Application of Chemical Sensors , 2001, The Biological Bulletin.

[54]  P. Mombaerts.  Seven-transmembrane proteins as odorant and chemosensory receptors. , 1999, Science.

[55]  Ring T. Cardé,et al.  Antennal resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in three moth species. , 2002, Journal of insect physiology.

[56]  Mark A. Willis,et al.  Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta , 1984 .

[57]  T. Baker,et al.  Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  L. Buck,et al.  Combinatorial Receptor Codes for Odors , 1999, Cell.