Two-state compression of spectral tilt: individual differences and psychoacoustical limitations to the benefit from compression.

A psychoacoustic rationale was developed for a hearing aid design in which compression of spectral tilt was incorporated without any instantaneous nonlinear distortion. This involved switching between a 'flat' and a 'rising' frequency response; the switching was done slowly to avoid audible transients and was controlled by feedback derived from comparison of output levels in low- and high-frequency channels, approximating voiced/unvoiced detection. The effect of this switching process was to narrow the distribution of spectral tilt values compared with the input. Asynchrony between the switching and the triggering speech structures was avoided by also delaying the signal path. Unfortunately, hearing-impaired listeners performed more poorly on the switching system than on either of the control 'flat' or 'rising' frequency-responses. An explanation is offered (on the basis of growing evidence from perceptual experiments) of the perceptual importance of temporal envelope contours within individual frequency bands. It was possible, in part, to predict individuals' results in the switching condition from age and audiometric or psychoacoustic characteristics. The results suggest a modification to the switching design, and they point to an intrinsic limit to the ability of all hearing aids of the compression type to enhance intelligibility.

[1]  Evans Ef Peripheral auditory processing in normal and abnormal ears: physiological considerations for attempts to compensate for auditory deficits by acoustic and electrical prostheses. , 1978 .

[2]  H. Levitt,et al.  Orthogonal polynomial compression amplification for the hearing impaired , 1986 .

[3]  E Villchur,et al.  Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[5]  M E Lutman,et al.  Speech identification under simulated hearing-aid frequency response characteristics in relation to sensitivity, frequency resolution, and temporal resolution. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  G. Thompson,et al.  Relationship of auditory distortion test results to speech discrimination through flat vs. selective amplifying systems. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  J. R. Trinder,et al.  Problems in realizing the potential of integrated circuits in future aids for the hearing-impaired , 1983 .

[8]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[9]  M. Haggard,et al.  Psychoacoustical and audiometric prediction of auditory disability for different frequency responses at listener-adjusted presentation levels. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[10]  K. Stevens,et al.  Effect of burst amplitude on the perception of stop consonant place of articulation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M P Haggard,et al.  The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF)--linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[12]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[13]  I V Nábĕlek Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  S. DeGennaro,et al.  Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners. , 1986 .

[16]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Hearing aid evaluation: reliability of repeated measurements. , 1960, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  M E Lutman,et al.  A simple clinical measure of frequency resolution. , 1985, British journal of audiology.

[18]  N I Durlach,et al.  Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  Mark P. Haggard New and Old Conceptions of Hearing Aids , 1983 .

[20]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: Phonetic exploration of an auditory aftereffect , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.