Regularization Properties of Mumford-Shah-Type Functionals with Perimeter and Norm Constraints for Linear Ill-Posed Problems

In this paper we consider the simultaneous reconstruction and segmentation of a function $f$ from measurements $g=Kf$, where $K$ is a linear operator. Assuming that the inversion of $K$ is ill-posed, regularization methods have to be used for the inversion process in case of inexact data. We propose using a Mumford--Shah-type functional for the stabilization of the inversion. Restricting our analysis to the recovery of piecewise constant functions, we investigate the existence of minimizers, their stability, and the regularization properties of our approach. Finally, we present a numerical example from single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

[1]  M. Burger A level set method for inverse problems , 2001 .

[2]  M. Glas,et al.  Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging , 2000 .

[3]  O. Scherzer,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: On the relation between constraint regularization, level sets, and shape optimization , 2006 .

[4]  C. Metz,et al.  The exponential Radon transform , 1980 .

[5]  Marc Droske,et al.  A Mumford-Shah Level-Set Approach for Geometric Image Registration , 2006, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[6]  F. FRÜHAUF,et al.  Analysis of Regularization Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems Involving Discontinuous Operators , 2005, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[7]  F. Santosa A Level-set Approach Inverse Problems Involving Obstacles , 1995 .

[8]  Michael Hintermüller,et al.  An Inexact Newton-CG-Type Active Contour Approach for the Minimization of the Mumford-Shah Functional , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[9]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  L. Ambrosio,et al.  Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems , 2000 .

[11]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  A convex relaxation approach for computing minimal partitions , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  R. Ramlau,et al.  Regularization of ill-posed Mumford–Shah models with perimeter penalization , 2010 .

[13]  James A. Sethian,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods , 1999 .

[14]  Xuecheng Tai,et al.  Inverse Problems: Exercices , 2009 .

[15]  Antonin Chambolle,et al.  Image Segmentation by Variational Methods: Mumford and Shah Functional and the Discrete Approximations , 1995, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[16]  Anthony J. Yezzi,et al.  Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  F. Santosa,et al.  Reconstruction of a two-dimensional binary obstacle by controlled evolution of a level-set , 1998 .

[18]  Leonid Kunyansky A new SPECT reconstruction algorithm based on the Novikov explicit inversion formula , 2001 .

[19]  G. David,et al.  Singular Sets of Minimizers for the Mumford-Shah Functional , 2005 .

[20]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces , 2002, Applied mathematical sciences.

[21]  S. Cherry,et al.  Physics in Nuclear Medicine , 2004 .

[22]  S. Osher,et al.  Level Set Methods for Optimization Problems Involving Geometry and Constraints I. Frequencies of a T , 2001 .

[23]  James A. Sethian,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid , 2012 .

[24]  R. Novikov,et al.  A noise property analysis of single-photon emission computed tomography data , 2004 .

[25]  Frank Natterer,et al.  On the inversion of the attenuated Radon transform , 1979 .

[26]  M. Burger,et al.  Level set methods for geometric inverse problems in linear elasticity , 2004 .

[27]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[28]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[29]  R. Kanwal Linear Integral Equations , 1925, Nature.

[30]  R. Novikov An inversion formula for the attenuated X-ray transformation , 2002 .

[31]  J. Sethian,et al.  FRONTS PROPAGATING WITH CURVATURE DEPENDENT SPEED: ALGORITHMS BASED ON HAMILTON-JACOB1 FORMULATIONS , 2003 .

[32]  Mark T Madsen,et al.  EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY: THE FUNDAMENTALS OF PET AND SPECT , 2005 .

[33]  Karl Kunisch,et al.  Total Bounded Variation Regularization as a Bilaterally Constrained Optimization Problem , 2004, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[34]  Ronny Ramlau,et al.  A Mumford-Shah level-set approach for the inversion and segmentation of X-ray tomography data , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[35]  L. Vese,et al.  A level set algorithm for minimizing the Mumford-Shah functional in image processing , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision.

[36]  F. Santosa,et al.  ENHANCED ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY VIA THE MUMFORD{SHAH FUNCTIONAL , 2001 .

[37]  D. Mumford,et al.  Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems , 1989 .

[38]  Nahum Kiryati,et al.  Semi-blind image restoration via Mumford-Shah regularization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.