Testing the equality of several gamma means: a parametric bootstrap method with applications

We apply a recently developed ‘Computational Approach Test’ (CAT), a variant of the parametric bootstrap method, to test the equality of means of several gamma distributions. All parameters are assumed to be unknown, and we consider two cases-(i) the shape parameters, though unknown, are assumed to be equal; and (ii) the shape parameters are all unknown and possibly unequal. The CAT, as applied to the above two cases, doesn’t require the knowledge of any sampling distribution, depends heavily on numerical computations and Monte-Carlo simulation, and figures out the critical region automatically. The power and/or size of our proposed CAT is quite encouraging compared with the other tests reported in the literature. The proposed method can be used as a logical alternative approach to classical one-way ANOVA when one is not sure about normality, and positively skewed distribution is a possibility for the observed data. Though the proposed CAT has been used recently to compare normal means by the present authors, its usefulness for comparing gamma means hadn’t been studied before. This paper shows that the CAT can be as good as, if not better than, the other proposed methods discussed in the literature to test the equality of several gamma means. Real life datasets have been used to illustrate the applicability of this method. Also, our comprehensive numerical study reveals that some of the frequently cited methods are not as good as they are claimed to be.

[1]  David Durand,et al.  Aids for Fitting the Gamma Distribution by Maximum Likelihood , 1960 .

[2]  H. Aksoy Use of Gamma Distribution in Hydrological Analysis , 2000 .

[3]  Lee J. Bain,et al.  Inferences concerning the Mean of the Gamma Distribution , 1980 .

[4]  James Samuel Allison,et al.  Bootstrap-based hypothesis testing , 2008 .

[5]  Lee J. Bain,et al.  A Two-Sample Test of Equal Gamma Distribution Scale Parameters With Unknown Common Shape Parameter , 1983 .

[6]  A gamma distribution of raindrop sizes and its application to Singapore's tropical environment , 1994 .

[7]  J. S. Urban Hjorth,et al.  Computer Intensive Statistical Methods: Validation, Model Selection, and Bootstrap , 1993 .

[8]  EFFECTS OF FRACTURING ON WELL YIELDS IN THE COALFIELD AREAS OF WISE AND DICKENSON COUNTIES, SOUTHWESTERN VIRGINIA , 1985 .

[9]  Cher Ming Tan,et al.  Application of gamma distribution in electromigration for submicron interconnects , 2007 .

[10]  An Analysis of Some Properties of Alternative Measures of Income Inequality Based on the Gamma Distribution Function , 1979 .

[11]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  DERIVATION OF THE GAMMA DISTRIBUTION BY USING THE PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ENTROPY (POME) , 1985 .

[12]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Computer Intensive Statistical Methods: Validation, Model Selection, and Bootstrap , 1993 .

[13]  Lee J. Bain,et al.  Test of equal gamma-distribution means with unknown and unequal shape parameters , 1988 .

[14]  Michael A. Martin,et al.  Bootstrap hypothesis testing for some common statistical problems: A critical evaluation of size and power properties , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[15]  Ram C. Tripathi,et al.  Statistical tests involving several independent gamma distributions , 1993 .

[16]  P. Hall,et al.  BOOTSTRAP HYPOTHESIS TESTING. AUTHOR'S REPLY , 1992 .

[17]  P. Bougeault,et al.  Cloud-Ensemble Relations Based on the Gamma Probability Distribution for the Higher-Order Models of the Planetary Boundary Layer , 1982 .

[18]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[19]  S. Singh Simplified Use of Gamma-Distribution/Nash Model for Runoff Modeling , 2004 .

[20]  Roger Stern,et al.  Fitting Models to Daily Rainfall Data , 1982 .

[21]  Joanne Simpson,et al.  USE OF THE GAMMA DISTRIBUTION IN SINGLE-CLOUD RAINFALL ANALYSIS , 1972 .

[22]  Susan R. Wilson,et al.  Two guidelines for bootstrap hypothesis testing , 1991 .