Level of Digitization in Dutch Hospitals and the Lengths of Stay of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

A substantial amount of research has been published on the association between the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) and quality outcomes in U.S. hospitals, while limited research has focused on the Western European experience. The purpose of this study is to explore the association between the use of EMR technologies in Dutch hospitals and length of stay after colorectal cancer surgery. Two data sets were leveraged for this study; the HIMSS Analytics Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAMSM) and the Dutch surgical colorectal audit (DSCA). The HIMSS Analytics EMRAM score was used to define a Dutch hospital’s electronic medical records (EMR) capabilities while the DSCA was used to profile colorectal surgery quality outcomes (specifically total length of stay (LOS) in the hospital and the LOS in ICU). A total of 73 hospitals with a valid EMRAM score and associated DSCA patients (n = 30.358) during the study period (2012–2014) were included in the comparative set. A multivariate regression method was used to test differences adjusted for case mix, year of surgery, surgical technique and for complications, as well as stratifying for academic affiliated hospitals and general hospitals. A significant negative association was observed to exist between the total LOS (relative median LOS 0,974, CI 95% 0.959–0,989) of patients treated in advanced EMR hospitals (high EMRAM score cohort) versus patients treated at less advanced EMR care settings, once the data was adjusted for the case mix, year of surgery and type of surgery (laparoscopy or laparotomy). Adjusting for complications in a subgroup of general hospitals (n = 39) yielded essentially the same results (relative median LOS 0,934, CI 95% 0,915–0,954). No consistent significant associations were found with respect to LOS on the ICU. The findings of this study suggest advanced EMR capabilities support a healthcare provider’s efforts to achieve desired quality outcomes and efficiency in Western European hospitals.

[1]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Developing Maturity Models for IT Management , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[2]  Lorren Pettit.  Understanding EMRAM and how it can be used by policy-makers, hospital CIOs and their IT teams. , 2013, World hospitals and health services : the official journal of the International Hospital Federation.

[3]  V. Lemmens,et al.  The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. , 2013, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  S. Retchin,et al.  Electronic medical record systems at academic health centers: advantages and implementation issues. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  Michel W. J. M. Wouters,et al.  Failure-to-Rescue After Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Association with Three Structural Hospital Factors , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[6]  F. Chang,et al.  Progress in electronic medical record adoption in Canada. , 2015, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[7]  Lorren Pettit,et al.  The Association between eHealth Capabilities and the Quality and Safety of Health Care in the Netherlands: Comparison of HIMSS Analytics EMRAM data with Elsevier’s ‘The Best Hospitals’ data , 2015, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[9]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Leveraging EHRs to improve hospital performance: the role of management. , 2014, The American journal of managed care.

[10]  Maulik S Joshi,et al.  Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals' adoption of electronic health records. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[11]  David D. Dobrzykowski,et al.  Examining Heterogeneous Patterns of Electronic Health Records Use: A Contingency Perspective and Assessment , 2012, Int. J. Heal. Inf. Syst. Informatics.

[12]  Wood Eh,et al.  The association of American medical colleges , 1998 .

[13]  D. Oleynikov,et al.  Resident involvement in laparoscopic procedures does not worsen clinical outcomes but may increase operative times and length of hospital stay , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  J. Kievit,et al.  Variation in case-mix between hospitals treating colorectal cancer patients in the Netherlands. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[15]  T. Payne.  Electronic health records and patient safety: should we be discouraged? , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[16]  David W. Bates,et al.  The use of health information technology in seven nations , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  J. Kievit,et al.  Nonelective Colon Cancer Resections in Elderly Patients: Results from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit , 2012, Digestive Surgery.

[18]  R. Tollenaar,et al.  Combining process indicators to evaluate quality of care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: are scores consistent with short-term outcome? , 2012, BMJ quality & safety.

[19]  D. Anthony,et al.  Information technology and hospital patient safety: a cross-sectional study of US acute care hospitals. , 2014, The American journal of managed care.