Removing zero-lag functional connections can alter EEG-source space networks at rest

Electro-encephalography (EEG) source connectivity is an emerging approach to estimate brain networks with high time/space resolution. Here, we aim to evaluate the effect of different functional connectivity (FC) methods on the EEG-source space networks at rest. The two main families of FC methods tested are: i) the FC methods that do not remove the zero-lag connectivity including the Phase Locking Value (PLV) and the Amplitude Envelope Correlation (AEC) and ii) the FC methods that remove the zero-lag connections such as the Phase Lag Index (PLI) and orthogonalisation approach combined with PLV (PLVorth) and AEC (AECorth). Methods are evaluated on resting state dense-EEG signals recorded from 20 healthy participants. Networks obtained by each FC method are compared with fMRI networks at rest (from the Human Connectome Project -HCP-, N=487). Results show low correlations for all the FC methods, however PLV and AEC networks are significantly correlated with fMRI networks (ρ = 0.12, p = 1.93×10−8 and ρ = 0.06, p = 0.007, respectively), while other methods are not. These observations are consistent for each EEG frequency bands and for different FC matrices threshold. Furthermore, the effect of electrode density was also tested using four EEG montages (dense-EEG 256 electrodes, 128, 64 and 32 electrodes). Results show no significant differences between the four EEG montages in terms of correlations with the fMRI networks. Our main message here is to be careful when selecting the FC methods and mainly those that remove the zero-lag connections as they can affect the network characteristics. More comparative studies (based on simulation and real data) are still needed in order to make EEG source connectivity a mature technique to address questions in cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

[1]  C. Stam,et al.  Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool , 2012, NeuroImage.

[3]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  The (in)stability of functional brain network measures across thresholds , 2015, NeuroImage.

[4]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Mechanisms of Zero-Lag Synchronization in Cortical Motifs , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  C. Stam,et al.  The effect of epoch length on estimated EEG functional connectivity and brain network organisation , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  J Rizkallah,et al.  Dynamic reshaping of functional brain networks during visual object recognition , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Cortical Core for Dynamic Integration of Functional Networks in the Resting Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[9]  Mahmoud Hassan,et al.  Identification of Interictal Epileptic Networks from Dense-EEG , 2016, Brain Topography.

[10]  A. Gramfort,et al.  Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J. Matias Palva,et al.  Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses , 2017, NeuroImage.

[12]  Olaf Hauk,et al.  Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[13]  René S. Kahn,et al.  Associated Microscale Spine Density and Macroscale Connectivity Disruptions in Schizophrenia , 2016, Biological Psychiatry.

[14]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  A general linear model for MEG beamformer imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  W. Singer,et al.  Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas , 1997, Nature.

[17]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  How reliable are MEG resting-state connectivity metrics? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[18]  Bastian Cheng,et al.  Modeling of Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks Based on Structural Connectivity from DTI: Comparison with EEG Derived Phase Coupling Networks and Evaluation of Alternative Methods along the Modeling Path , 2016, bioRxiv.

[19]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Enhancement of MR Images Using Registration for Signal Averaging , 1998, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.

[20]  M. Hallett,et al.  Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Marco Ganzetti,et al.  Detecting Large-Scale Brain Networks Using EEG: Impact of Electrode Density, Head Modeling and Source Localization , 2018, Front. Neuroinform..

[22]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes , 2015, NeuroImage.

[23]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity in MEG: A multivariate approach insensitive to linear source leakage , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Kramer,et al.  Emergence of Stable Functional Networks in Long-Term Human Electroencephalography , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Vangelis Sakkalis,et al.  Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[28]  Darren Price,et al.  Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG source localization: Sensor density and head surface coverage , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  Mahmoud Hassan,et al.  Electroencephalography Source Connectivity: Aiming for High Resolution of Brain Networks in Time and Space , 2018, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[31]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures , 2017, NeuroImage.

[32]  Joshua Carp,et al.  On the Plurality of (Methodological) Worlds: Estimating the Analytic Flexibility of fMRI Experiments , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[33]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Dynamics of large-scale electrophysiological networks: A technical review , 2017, NeuroImage.

[34]  A Kabbara,et al.  The dynamic functional core network of the human brain at rest , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Théodore Papadopoulo,et al.  OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[36]  Mahmoud Hassan,et al.  EEG Source Connectivity Analysis: From Dense Array Recordings to Brain Networks , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[38]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[39]  Eugenio Rodriguez,et al.  Studying Single-Trials of phase Synchronous Activity in the Brain , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[40]  C. Berrou,et al.  Dynamic reorganization of functional brain networks during picture naming , 2015, Cortex.