Physical correlates of perceived quality in lakeshore development

Abstract This research examined dimensions of perception and preference for shoreline scenes. A systematic random sample of 63 shoreline scenes was obtained and photographed. Sixty adults were asked to sort the photographs of shoreline scenes in terms of similarity. They were also asked to identify the constructs which they used to sort and to rank the scenes in terms of preference. Comparisons of preferences by age, income, marital status, and sex groups indicated few significant differences and high correlations between the groups. Multidimensional scaling and canonical correlation revealed that a four‐dimensional solution‐Obtrusiveness in land/water barriers. Upkeep, Diverse/man‐made and Land‐use compatibility‐adequately described the dimensions of perception. The results of stepwise regression analysis indicated that preference increased with decreases in diversity, industry, streets, and land/ water barriers and with increases in vegetation and upkeep.

[1]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  The psychological representation of molar physical environments , 1981 .

[2]  W. Michelson.  Man and His Urban Environment: a sociological approach , 1970 .

[3]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material , 1972 .

[4]  Anke Oostendorp,et al.  Dimensions in the perception of architecture:I. Identification and interpretation of dimensions of similarity , 1978 .

[5]  G. Moeller,et al.  What Fishermen Look for in a Fishing Experience , 1972 .

[6]  Elwood L. Shafer,et al.  Aesthetic and Emotional Experiences Rate High With Northeast Wilderness Hikers , 1969 .

[7]  R. Ulrich.  Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment , 1983 .

[8]  T. Garling,et al.  The Structural Analysis of Environmental Perception and Cognition , 1976 .

[9]  Kenneth Pearlman,et al.  Environmental aesthetics: Aesthetic regulation and the courts , 1988 .

[10]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Prediction of Preference for Familiar Urban Places , 1976 .

[11]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Cognition and Environment: Function - ing in an Uncertain World , 1983 .

[12]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features , 1977 .

[13]  George L. Peterson,et al.  A Comparison of the Sentiments and Perceptions of Wilderness Managers and Canoeists in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area , 1974 .

[14]  J. Wohlwill.  Environmental Aesthetics: The Environment as a Source of Affect , 1976 .

[15]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[16]  Joachim F. Wohlwill,et al.  What belongs where: research on the fittingness of man‐made structures in natural settings , 1978 .

[17]  John A. Dearinger,et al.  An Attempt at Assessing Preferences for Natural Landscapes. , 1972 .

[18]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[19]  J. Nasar.  Adult Viewers' Preferences in Residential Scenes , 1983 .

[20]  R. Lucas.  The Contribution of Environmental Research to Wilderness Policy Decisions , 1966 .