Innovation and heterogeneous knowledge in managerial contact networks

Innovation, particularly in a dynamic environment, is crucial to a firm’s competitiveness. We test the hypothesis that managers’ performance, particularly their innovativeness, is related to the diversity of knowledge to which they are exposed in their interactions with colleagues. In a study of 106 managers in a high technology company, we find their performance benefits from increasing diversity of knowledge among their contacts. However, the effect of knowledge heterogeneity depends on the presence of sparse local networks. The joint influence of heterogeneity and sparse network structure is stronger for managerial innovation than for a more general measure of managerial performance. This suggests that the link between knowledge heterogeneity and performance relies on a process of knowledge synthesis involved in the generation of new ideas, with sparse networks affording managers the local autonomy needed for their development and implementation.

[1]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations , 1994 .

[2]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[3]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[4]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[5]  D. Krackhardt Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[6]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[7]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[8]  T. Lubart,et al.  Emotion, Metaphor, and the Creative Process , 1997 .

[9]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[10]  Robert A. Burgelman A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy , 1983 .

[11]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[12]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  J. Gower,et al.  Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients , 1986 .

[14]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Markets, Firms, and the Process of Economic Development , 1999 .

[15]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[16]  Mark Turner,et al.  A Mechanism of Creativity , 1999, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[17]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[18]  Denis M. S. Lee,et al.  Technology Transfer as a Function of Position in the Spectrum from Research Through Development to Technical Services , 1979 .

[19]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[20]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.