Applying the open innovation system concept to infrastructure projects

Purpose: The goal of this conceptual paper is to provide tools to help maximise the value delivered by infrastructure projects, by developing methods to increase adoption of innovative products during construction. Methods: The role of knowledge flows in determining innovation adoption rates is conceptually examined. A promising new approach is developed. Open innovation system theory is extended, by reviewing the role of three frameworks: (1) knowledge intermediaries, (2) absorptive capacity and (3) governance arrangements. Originality: We develop a novel open innovation system model to guide further research in the area of adoption of innovation on infrastructure projects. The open innovation system model currently lacks definition of core concepts, especially with regard to the impact of different degrees and types of openness. The three frameworks address this issue and add substance to the open innovation system model, addressing widespread criticism that it is underdeveloped. The novelty of our model is in the combination of the three frameworks to explore the system. These frameworks promise new insights into system dynamics and facilitate the development of new methods to optimise the diffusion of innovation. Practical Implications: The framework will help to reveal gaps in knowledge flows that impede the uptake of innovations. In the past, identifying these gaps has been difficult given the lack of nuance in existing theory. The knowledge maps proposed will enable informed policy advice to effectively harness the power of knowledge networks, increase innovation diffusion and improve the performance of infrastructure projects. The models developed in this paper will be used in planned empirical research into innovation on large scale infrastructure projects in the Australian built environment.

[1]  C. Debresson,et al.  Networks of innovators:A review and introduction to the issue , 1991 .

[2]  J. Howells.  Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[3]  Bob Jessop,et al.  The Future of the Capitalist State , 2002 .

[4]  Chris Harty,et al.  Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach , 2005 .

[5]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[6]  B. Lundvall.  Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool , 2022 .

[7]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[8]  Karen Manley,et al.  Implementation of innovation by manufacturers subcontracting to construction projects , 2008 .

[9]  C. Freeman.  Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[10]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[11]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda , 2006 .

[12]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[13]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Localized knowledge percolation processes and information networks , 1996 .

[14]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[15]  Rachel L. Parker,et al.  Governance and the Entrepreneurial Economy: A Comparative Analysis of Three Regions , 2008 .

[16]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  The Contractor‐Subcontractor Relationship: The Subcontractor's View , 1994 .

[17]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[18]  Jane Marceau.  A networked nation or a complexes issue? Reshaping industry analysis , 1995 .

[19]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[20]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[22]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[23]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  Component manufacturers' perceptions of managing innovation , 2006 .

[24]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Introduction to the Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Fred Argy,et al.  Australia’s fiscal straitjacket , 2008 .

[26]  Karen Manley,et al.  Integrated Manufacturing-Services Businesses in the Australian Building and Construction Sector , 2002 .

[27]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[28]  K. London,et al.  An industrial organization economic supply chain approach for the construction industry: a review , 2001 .

[29]  C. Freeman.  Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[30]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Benefit evaluation for off‐site production in construction , 2006 .

[31]  Justin Tan.  Growth of Industry Clusters and Innovation: Lessons from Beijing Zhongguancun Science Park , 2006 .

[32]  David Gann,et al.  Putting academic ideas into practice: technological progress and the absorptive capacity of construction organizations , 2001 .

[33]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATIONS , 1999 .

[34]  Karen Manley,et al.  Frameworks for Understanding Interactive Innovation Processes , 2003 .

[35]  R. Normann,et al.  From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[36]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[37]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[38]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Implementation of construction innovations , 2000 .

[39]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[40]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[41]  Gregory A. Bigley,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON HOW GOVERMENTS MATTER , 2005 .

[42]  R. Rothwell.  Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process , 1994 .

[43]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , 2005 .

[44]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  Choice and delivery in housebuilding: lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders , 2003 .

[45]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life , 1991 .

[46]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[47]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[48]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .