Dustiness of Fine and Nanoscale Powders

Dustiness may be defined as the propensity of a powder to form airborne dust by a prescribed mechanical stimulus; dustiness testing is typically intended to replicate mechanisms of dust generation encountered in workplaces. A novel dustiness testing device, developed for pharmaceutical application, was evaluated in the dustiness investigation of 27 fine and nanoscale powders. The device efficiently dispersed small (mg) quantities of a wide variety of fine and nanoscale powders, into a small sampling chamber. Measurements consisted of gravimetrically determined total and respirable dustiness. The following materials were studied: single and multiwalled carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, and carbon blacks; fumed oxides of titanium, aluminum, silicon, and cerium; metallic nanoparticles (nickel, cobalt, manganese, and silver) silicon carbide, Arizona road dust; nanoclays; and lithium titanate. Both the total and respirable dustiness spanned two orders of magnitude (0.3–37.9% and 0.1–31.8% of the predispersed test powders, respectively). For many powders, a significant respirable dustiness was observed. For most powders studied, the respirable dustiness accounted for approximately one-third of the total dustiness. It is believed that this relationship holds for many fine and nanoscale test powders (i.e. those primarily selected for this study), but may not hold for coarse powders. Neither total nor respirable dustiness was found to be correlated with BET surface area, therefore dustiness is not determined by primary particle size. For a subset of test powders, aerodynamic particle size distributions by number were measured (with an electrical low-pressure impactor and an aerodynamic particle sizer). Particle size modes ranged from approximately 300nm to several micrometers, but no modes below 100nm, were observed. It is therefore unlikely that these materials would exhibit a substantial sub-100nm particle contribution in a workplace.

[1]  Sherrie Elzey,et al.  Airborne Monitoring to Distinguish Engineered Nanomaterials from Incidental Particles for Environmental Health and Safety , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[2]  L. C. Kenny,et al.  Characterization and modelling of a family of cyclone aerosol preseparators , 1995 .

[3]  Kevin H. Dunn,et al.  Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  P. Class,et al.  Dustiness of different high-temperature insulation wools and refractory ceramic fibres. , 2001, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[5]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  DOCUMENTATION OF A DUSTINESS DRUM TEST , 1996 .

[6]  K. Hjemsted,et al.  Dustiness from powder materials , 1996 .

[7]  P. Baron,et al.  Inhalation vs. aspiration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in C57BL/6 mice: inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and mutagenesis. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[8]  Göran Lidén Dustiness testing of materials handled at workplaces. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  Ian Lowndes,et al.  Assessment of the dustiness and the dust liberation mechanisms of limestone quarry operations , 2007 .

[10]  Per Axel Clausen,et al.  Dustiness behaviour of loose and compacted Bentonite and organoclay powders: What is the difference in exposure risk? , 2009 .

[11]  B. Biscans,et al.  SFGP 2007 - Ultrafine Aerosol Generation from Free Falling Nanopowders: Experiments and Numerical Modelling , 2008 .

[12]  C Cowherd,et al.  Dust inhalation exposures from the handling of small volumes of powders. , 1989, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[13]  M. Stolzenburg,et al.  In situ structure characterization of airborne carbon nanofibres by a tandem mobility-mass analysis. , 2006, Nanotechnology.

[14]  David Leith,et al.  Method to evaluate the dustiness of pharmaceutical powders. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  David Mark,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the dustiness of industrial minerals according to European standard EN 15051, 2006. , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[16]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[17]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Size selective dustiness and exposure; simulated workplace comparisons. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  Douglas E. Evans,et al.  Exposure and emissions monitoring during carbon nanofiber production--Part I: elemental carbon and iron-soot aerosols. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[19]  D. Leith,et al.  Dust Generation from Handling Powders in Industry , 1995 .

[20]  E. Teller,et al.  ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS , 1938 .

[21]  P. Swuste,et al.  Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[22]  Derk Brouwer,et al.  Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. , 2010, Toxicology.

[23]  P. O’Shaughnessy,et al.  A Novel Device for Measuring Respirable Dustiness Using Low-Mass Powder Samples , 2012, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[24]  Michael J. Ellenbecker,et al.  Exposure assessment of nano-sized and respirable particles at different workplaces , 2011 .

[25]  Peng-Chi Tsai,et al.  Dustiness test of nanopowders using a standard rotating drum with a modified sampling train , 2009 .

[26]  T Schneider,et al.  Cellulosic building insulation versus mineral wool, fiberglass or perlite: installer's exposure by inhalation of fibers, dust, endotoxin and fire-retardant additives. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[27]  K Willeke,et al.  An investigation of dust generation by free falling powders. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[28]  David Leith,et al.  VALIDATING A MODEL FOR THE PREDICTION OF DUST GENERATION , 1995 .

[29]  K Y Chung,et al.  Dustiness testing and moving towards a biologically relevant dustiness index. , 1994, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[30]  A. H. M. Andreasen,et al.  über das Stäubungsvermögen der Stoffe , 1939 .

[31]  Otto Melchior Poulsen,et al.  DUSTINESS OF COMPOSTABLE WASTE: A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO QUANTIFY THE POTENTIAL OF WASTE TO GENERATE AIRBORNE MICRO-ORGANISMS AND ENDOTOXIN , 1997 .

[32]  D. Leith,et al.  PARTICLE SEPARATION MECHANISMS IN FLOW OF GRANULAR MATERIAL , 1994 .

[33]  William A. Heitbrink,et al.  Correlation of Tests for Material Dustiness with Worker Exposure from the Bagging of Powders , 1989 .

[34]  D Leith,et al.  Experimental examination of factors that affect dust generation. , 1991, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[35]  M. Birch,et al.  Properties that influence the specific surface areas of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers. , 2013, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[36]  P. Baron,et al.  Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[37]  M. Schubauer-Berigan,et al.  Occupational exposure assessment in carbon nanotube and nanofiber primary and secondary manufacturers. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[38]  L. Cheng Formation of airborne-respirable dust at belt conveyor transfer points. , 1973, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[39]  Niels O. Breum,et al.  The rotating drum dustiness tester: Variability in dustiness in relation to sample mass, testing time, and surface adhesion , 1999 .

[40]  D Leith,et al.  Experimental examination of factors that affect dust generation by using Heubach and MRI testers. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[41]  C. M. Hammond,et al.  PROGRESS IN DUSTINESS ESTIMATION BRITISH OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE SOCIETY TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE WORKING PARTY ON DUSTINESS ESTIMATION , 1988 .

[42]  D M O'Brien,et al.  The application of dustiness tests to the prediction of worker dust exposure. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[43]  Paul Schulte,et al.  Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[44]  K. H. Carlson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF TWO DUSTINESS EVALUATION METHODS , 1992 .

[45]  Brian Cawley,et al.  Bench-Top Apparatus to Examine Factors that Affect Dust Generation , 1993 .

[46]  James McGlothlin,et al.  Ergonomics Case Study: Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation Instruction Issues for Students , 2009, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[47]  Kenneth L. Cashdollar,et al.  Overview of dust explosibility characteristics , 2000 .

[48]  Frank Hamelmann,et al.  Methods of Estimating the Dustiness of Industrial Powders – A Review , 2003 .

[49]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  Combined single-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[50]  E. Kuempel,et al.  Occupational exposure to titanium dioxide , 2011 .

[51]  Sylvia Bach,et al.  Determining the dustiness of powders--a comparison of three measuring devices. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.