Household decision-making for everyday travel: a case study of walking and cycling in Lancaster (UK)

Increased walking and cycling for short journeys in urban areas has many obvious advantages yet so far gains from the promotion of more sustainable travel of this type are mostly small. This paper reports on a large research project which uses a mixed method approach to explore attitudes to and perceptions of walking and cycling, and which examines the process of household decision-making for everyday travel and the constraints that this imposes. Using survey, interview and ethnographic data it is argued that many people hold ambiguous and sometimes contradictory views of walking and cycling as effective means of everyday travel, that what they do rarely matches precisely what they believe, and that the complexity and contingency associated with everyday travel for many households is a major barrier to the use of more sustainable travel modes. It is suggested that better understanding of these processes could help to inform both future transport policy and the promotion of walking and cycling for short trips in urban areas.

[1]  Anna Timperio,et al.  Associations among Individual, Social, and Environmental Barriers and Children's Walking or Cycling to School , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[2]  Donna Lockett,et al.  Through seniors' eyes: an exploratory qualitative study to identify environmental barriers to and facilitators of walking. , 2005, The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres.

[3]  P. Adab,et al.  Relationship between walking levels and perceptions of the local neighbourhood environment , 2006, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[4]  Sonja Haustein,et al.  Attitude-Based Target Groups to Reduce the Ecological Impact of Daily Mobility Behavior , 2010 .

[5]  Mariela Alfonzo,et al.  To Walk or Not to Walk? The Hierarchy of Walking Needs , 2005 .

[6]  Phil Jones,et al.  Mobile Methodologies: Theory, Technology and Practice , 2008 .

[7]  Roger Mackett,et al.  Why do people use their cars for short trips? , 2003 .

[8]  N. Mutrie,et al.  Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  C. A. Moser,et al.  Survey Methods in Social Investigation , 1958 .

[10]  Roger Silverstone,et al.  Listening to a long conversation: An ethnographic approach to the study of information and communication technologies in the home , 1991 .

[11]  Dale Southerton,et al.  `Squeezing Time' , 2003 .

[12]  P. Cox,et al.  Cycling and Society , 2012 .

[13]  Sandra Wallman,et al.  Eight London households , 1984 .

[14]  Simon Kingham,et al.  An Assessment of the Benefits of the Walking School Bus in Christchurch, New Zealand , 2007 .

[15]  Jillian Anable,et al.  'Complacent Car Addicts' or 'Aspiring Environmentalists'? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory , 2005 .

[16]  Felipe González Castro,et al.  A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses , 2010, Journal of mixed methods research.

[17]  Helen Jarvis,et al.  Dispelling the Myth that Preference makes Practice in Residential Location and Transport Behaviour , 2003 .

[18]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Explaining Showering: A Discussion of the Material, Conventional, and Temporal Dimensions of Practice , 2005 .

[19]  Pierre Filion,et al.  Wasted Density? The Impact of Toronto's Residential-Density-Distribution Policies on Public-Transit Use and Walking , 2006 .

[20]  A Killoran,et al.  Transport interventions promoting safe cycling and walking - evidence briefing , 2006 .

[21]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Condensing Practices , 2007 .

[22]  Roger Mackett,et al.  POLICIES TO ATTRACT DRIVERS OUT OF THEIR CARS FOR SHORT TRIPS , 2001 .

[23]  Nicky Gregson,et al.  'Home'-Making: On the Spatiality of Daily Social Reproduction in Contemporary Middle-Class Britain , 1995 .

[24]  Robyn Dowling,et al.  Cultures of mothering and car use in suburban Sydney: a preliminary investigation , 2000 .

[25]  Conrad Phillip Kottak,et al.  CHAUFFEURING AND COMMUTING , 2007 .

[26]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[27]  Margarethe Kusenbach,et al.  Street Phenomenology , 2003 .

[28]  Jeff Mapes.  Pedaling Revolution: How Cyclists Are Changing American Cities , 2009 .

[29]  Charlie Foster,et al.  Perceived barriers to walking in the neighbourhood environment and change in physical activity levels over 12 months , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[30]  J. Harry Wray,et al.  Pedal Power: The Quiet Rise of the Bicycle in American Public Life , 2008 .

[31]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  Philip E. Ogden,et al.  Households matter: the quiet demography of urban transformation , 2005 .

[33]  A Cope,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of evidence on the effects of investment in six Cycling Demonstration Towns , 2009 .

[34]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[35]  R. Carpiano,et al.  Come take a walk with me: the "go-along" interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. , 2009, Health & place.

[36]  E. Miller,et al.  A computerized household activity scheduling survey , 2000 .

[37]  Anne E. Green,et al.  Who Decides What? Decision Making in Dual-Career Households , 1997 .