Space frontiers for new pedagogies: a tale of constraints and possibilities

This article draws together two linked studies on formal teaching spaces within one university. The first consisted of a multi‐method analysis, including observations of four teaching events, interviews with academics and estates staff, analysis of architectural plans, and a talking campus tour. The second study surveyed 166 students about their perceptions of existing teaching spaces and dreams of ideal spaces, eliciting qualitative comments. Researchers used a comparative analysis of the data to generate themes. Academics and students held differing conceptions of space. For students, a functional view prevailed with teacher‐centred and dominant approaches (lectures, seminars, tutorials) constraining their imagination of fresh possibilities. Academics reflected on the limits and potential of spaces, surfacing more abstract concepts about familiarity, invisibility, space–time dimensions, territoriality and collegiality. The article explores the boundaries that space may place over imagined and alternative pedagogies, and concludes that familiar, computer‐networked and conventional spaces may re‐inscribe hierarchical, teacher‐centred approaches.

[1]  Simon A. Austin,et al.  Learning landscapes in higher education: clearing pathways, making spaces, involving academics in the leadership, governance and management of academic spaces in higher education , 2009 .

[2]  Kim Niewolny,et al.  Globalisation and pedagogy: space, place and identity , 2009 .

[3]  Eric Ras,et al.  Learning Spaces , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education.

[4]  S. Lloyd,et al.  A large‐scale investigation into the relationship between attendance and attainment: a study using an innovative, electronic attendance monitoring system , 2008 .

[5]  P. Temple.  Learning Spaces in Higher Education: An Under-Researched Topic. , 2008 .

[6]  G. Boulton‐Lewis.  Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[7]  Paul Temple,et al.  Learning spaces for the 21st century: a review of the literature , 2007 .

[8]  John H. Schuh,et al.  Assessing Conditions to Enhance Educational Effectiveness: The Inventory for Student Engagement and Success , 2005 .

[9]  R. Barnacle.  Retention and Student Success in Higher Education , 2005 .

[10]  James H. Banning,et al.  Educating by Design: Creating Campus Learning Environments That Work. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 2001 .

[11]  Richard Edwards,et al.  Globalisation & Pedagogy: Space, Place and Identity , 2000 .

[12]  M. O'hare.  Classroom design for discussion-based teaching , 1998 .

[13]  J. M. Collins.  Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher , 1997 .

[14]  Simon Sheikh.  The Production of Space , 1996 .

[15]  S. Brookfield.  Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1995 .

[16]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[17]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[18]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[19]  M. Rose.  A history of King Alfred's College, Winchester, 1840-1980 , 1981 .

[20]  J. Hassenforder.  Fifteen thousand hours : secondary schools and their effects on children / M. Rutter, B. Maugham, P. Mortimore, J. Ouston , 1981 .

[21]  W. Garms,et al.  Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children , 1980 .

[22]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .