Enabling laboratory medicine in primary care through EMR systems use: A survey of Canadian physicians

[1]  Guy Paré,et al.  Laboratory testing in primary care: A systematic review of health IT impacts , 2018, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  D. Ramaekers,et al.  Electronic Laboratory Medicine ordering with evidence-based Order sets in primary care (ELMO study): protocol for a cluster randomised trial , 2017, Implementation Science.

[3]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Characterizing, Explaining and Valuing the Effective Use of an IT Artefact: A Field Study of Performance Management Information Systems in SMEs , 2017, HICSS.

[4]  B. Miller,et al.  Improving Diagnosis in Health Care , 2015 .

[5]  Guy Paré,et al.  Electronic health record usage behaviors in primary care medical practices: A survey of family physicians in Canada , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  D. Fernald,et al.  Launching a Laboratory Testing Process Quality Improvement Toolkit: From the Shared Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP) , 2015, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[7]  Brian E. Whitacre.  Rural EMR adoption rates overtake those in urban areas , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  J. Hickner,et al.  Primary care physicians and the laboratory: now and the future. , 2014, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Stephen S Raab,et al.  Laboratory Medicine Handoff Gaps Experienced by Primary Care Practices: A Report from the Shared Networks of Collaborative Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP) , 2014, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[10]  Shamma Al Alawi,et al.  Physician user satisfaction with an electronic medical records system in primary healthcare centres in Al Ain: a qualitative study , 2014, BMJ Open.

[11]  Richard J Lilford,et al.  Test result communication in primary care: clinical and office staff perspectives , 2014, Family practice.

[12]  Terry S. Field,et al.  Factors Associated with Ordering Laboratory Monitoring of High-Risk Medications , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  Hamish S. F. Fraser,et al.  Reducing Communication Delays and Improving Quality of Care with a Tuberculosis Laboratory Information System in Resource Poor Environments: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Brian R. Jackson,et al.  Primary Care Physicians' Challenges in Ordering Clinical Laboratory Tests and Interpreting Results , 2014, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[15]  Karen Tu,et al.  Evaluation of Electronic Medical Record Administrative data Linked Database (EMRALD). , 2014, The American journal of managed care.

[16]  Johanna Kaipio,et al.  User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Deepalika Chakravarty,et al.  Perceptions regarding the ease of use and usefulness of health information exchange systems among medical providers, case managers and non-clinical staff members working in HIV care and community settings , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[19]  Dominik Ose,et al.  Technical support and delegation to practice staff – status quo and (possible) future perspectives for primary health care in Germany , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[20]  Massimo Magni,et al.  What's the Weather Like? The Effect of Team Learning Climate, Empowerment Climate, and Gender on Individuals' Technology Exploration and Use , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Mario Plebani,et al.  The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Information Chaos in Primary Care: Implications for Physician Performance and Patient Safety , 2011, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[23]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Explaining physicians' use of EMR systems and performance in the shakedown phase , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  Jihoon Kim,et al.  Full impact of laboratory information system requires direct use by clinical staff: cluster randomized controlled trial , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  John Flach,et al.  The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference? , 2010, Family medicine.

[26]  Joshua R. Vest,et al.  What should we measure? Conceptualizing usage in health information exchange , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[27]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? , 2010, The American journal of medicine.

[28]  Lisa M. Schilling,et al.  Health information exchange in small-to-medium sized family medicine practices: Motivators, barriers, and potential facilitators of adoption , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  K. Eva,et al.  Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning , 2010, Medical education.

[30]  Urmimala Sarkar,et al.  Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[31]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. , 2009, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[32]  Steven R Simon,et al.  Improving laboratory monitoring of medications: an economic analysis alongside a clinical trial. , 2009, The American journal of managed care.

[33]  David W Bates,et al.  Electronic Results Management in Pediatric Ambulatory Care: Qualitative Assessment , 2009, Pediatrics.

[34]  John Hickner,et al.  Quality and safety in outpatient laboratory testing. , 2008, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[35]  S. Dovey,et al.  Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[36]  D. Watson,et al.  Population patterns of chronic health conditions, co-morbidity and healthcare use in Canada: implications for policy and practice. , 2008, Healthcare quarterly.

[37]  Israel Spiegler,et al.  Investigating diversity of clustering methods: An empirical comparison , 2007, Data Knowl. Eng..

[38]  Wei Wang,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2022 .

[39]  Jason M Kreuter,et al.  A clinician-centric medical results viewer. , 2007, Health management technology.

[40]  Steven R Simon,et al.  Improved therapeutic monitoring with several interventions: a randomized trial. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[41]  Douglas H. Fernald,et al.  Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[42]  Dennis Giokas,et al.  Canada Health Infoway - Towards a National Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Solution. , 2005, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[43]  David W. Bates,et al.  Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and ambulatory decision support systems , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[44]  J. Sitzia,et al.  Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. , 2003, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.