A microsystem-based assay for studying pollen tube guidance in plant reproduction

We present a novel microsystem-based assay to assess and quantify pollen tube behavior in response to pistil tissues. During plant reproduction, signals from female tissues (pistils) guide the sperm-carrying pollen tube to the egg cell to achieve fertilization and initiate seed development. Existing pollen tube guidance bioassays are performed in an isotropically diffusive environment (for example, a semi in vivo assay in petri dishes) instead of anisotropically diffusive conditions required to characterize guidance signal gradients. Lack of a sensitive pollen tube guidance bioassay has therefore compounded the difficulties of identifying and characterizing the guidance signals that are likely produced in minute quantities by the ovules. We therefore developed a novel microsystem-based assay that mimics the in vivo micro-environment of ovule fertilization by pollen tubes in the model research plant Arabidopsis thaliana. In this microdevice, the pollen tube growth rate, length and ovule targeting frequencies were similar to those obtained using a semi in vivo plate assay. As a direct measure of the microdevice's utility in monitoring pollen tube guidance, we demonstrated that in this device, pollen tubes preferentially enter chambers with unfertilized ovules, suggesting that the pollen tubes sense the concentration gradient and respond to the chemoattractants secreted by unfertilized ovules.

[1]  Hong Wang,et al.  A floral transmitting tissue-specific glycoprotein attracts pollen tubes and stimulates their growth , 1995, Cell.

[2]  T. Kuroiwa,et al.  Defensin-like polypeptide LUREs are pollen tube attractants secreted from synergid cells , 2009, Nature.

[3]  A. Khademhosseini,et al.  Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Microsystem-Based Study of Pollen-Tube Attractants Secreted by Ovules , 2009, 2009 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[5]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[6]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Microfabrication meets microbiology , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[7]  Dhananjay Bodas,et al.  Formation of more stable hydrophilic surfaces of PDMS by plasma and chemical treatments , 2006 .

[8]  Jian Yang,et al.  Metabolomics spectral formatting, alignment and conversion tools (MSFACTs) , 2003, Bioinform..

[9]  Ravishankar Palanivelu,et al.  Distinct short-range ovule signals attract or repel Arabidopsis thaliana pollen tubes in vitro , 2006, BMC Plant Biology.

[10]  J. Feijó The mathematics of sexual attraction , 2010, Journal of biology.

[11]  A. Geitmann,et al.  Fertilization Requires Communication: Signal Generation and Perception During Pollen Tube Guidance , 2007 .

[12]  J. P. Mascarenhas Molecular Mechanisms of Pollen Tube Growth and Differentiation. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[13]  M. Jones-Rhoades,et al.  Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance , 2010, BMC Plant Biology.

[14]  J. Mollet,et al.  Chemocyanin, a small basic protein from the lily stigma, induces pollen tube chemotropism , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  A. Mata,et al.  Fabrication of multi-layer SU-8 microstructures , 2006 .

[16]  R. Wing,et al.  Isolation and expression of an anther-specific gene from tomato , 1989, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[17]  T. Kuroiwa,et al.  Guidance in Vitro of the Pollen Tube to the Naked Embryo Sac of Torenia fournieri , 1998, Plant Cell.