Digital Slide Assessment for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score in Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma: Focus on Validation and Vision

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents a leading cause of mortality in some countries. The 5-years overall survival has improved modestly over the past 3 decades and is still only at 50–65% despite combined surgical resection and radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (Johnson et al., 2020). In recent years, new immunotherapy drugs inhibiting the interaction between programmed death 1 (PD-1) expressed on T-helper lymphocytes and its ligand programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) expressed on cancer cells have been utilized as an effective treatment for different types of advanced cancers including HNSCC. The binding of PD1 to its ligand PD-L1 normally reduces the proliferation and activity of cytotoxic CD8 T lymphocytes against presented antigens, thus inducing self-tolerance. The introduction of immunotherapy drugs targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis represented a turning point in the therapy of HNSCC. PD-L1 status is assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the combined positive score (CPS). This integrated scoring system considers the expression of the PD-L1 immune checkpoint biomarker on the cell membrane of both tumor and tumor-associated inflammatory cells. The CPS assessment is often performed on small biopsy material, as candidate patients present with advanced cancer are often unfit for large surgery as are those with recurrence after adjuvant therapy. PD-L1 expression is associated with an increased objective response rate to therapy, with better responses observed when the CPS ≥ 20, as was recently shown in clinical trials investigating the efficacy of this first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor in recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC (Burtness et al., 2019). This finding is crucial for clinicians in order for them to prescribe the best course of treatment for cancer patients. Consequently, it is to be expected that pathologists are increasingly requested to assess companion PD-L1 CPS on HNSCC specimens in order to meet the rising demand of selecting suitable patients for immunotherapy. Reliable immunohistochemical assessment of PD-L1 requires not only expertize in head and neck pathology, but also validated IHC assays and tailored training for accurate, standardized and reproducible PD-L1 scoring among pathologists (Pagni et al., 2020). Efficiency and high diagnostic quality are extremely important for PD-L1 scoring. Training of pathologists is key to achieving this goal. The CPS is more complex than the Tumor Proportion Score (TPS), as it requires specific and separate counting of tumor and immune cells that are positive for PD-L1. TPS evaluates PD-L1 expression by the ratio of stained tumor cells to the total number of viable tumor cells. As depicted in Figure 1, CPS assessment requires additional steps: first of all, the total number of viable tumor cells are counted to and represent the denominator of the formula. Edited by: Fabricio Alves Barbosa da Silva, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Brazil

[1]  Kristine A. Erps,et al.  Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. , 2009, Human pathology.

[2]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Validation of Remote Digital Frozen Sections for Cancer and Transplant Intraoperative Services , 2018, Journal of pathology informatics.

[3]  David C Wilbur,et al.  Ovarian frozen section diagnosis: use of whole-slide imaging shows excellent correlation between virtual slide and original interpretations in a large series of cases. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  L. Pantanowitz,et al.  Digital Slides as an Effective Tool for Programmed Death Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score Assessment and Training: Lessons Learned from the “Programmed Death Ligand 1 Key Learning Program in Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma” , 2021, Journal of pathology informatics.

[5]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Digital pathology and COVID-19 and future crises: pathologists can safely diagnose cases from home using a consumer monitor and a mini PC , 2020, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[6]  Hung-Ming Wang,et al.  Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study , 2019, The Lancet.

[7]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  R. Feddersen,et al.  Digital Whole Slide Imaging Compared With Light Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter, Double-Blinded, Randomized Study of 2045 Cases. , 2020, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study. , 2020, The Lancet. Digital health.

[10]  J. Grandis,et al.  Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2020, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[11]  Landon J. Inge,et al.  Development and applications of computer image analysis algorithms for scoring of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry , 2020, Immuno-oncology technology.

[12]  A. Marchetti,et al.  Digital Pathology and PD-L1 Testing in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Workshop Record , 2020, Cancers.

[13]  Michael Barnes,et al.  Whole tumor section quantitative image analysis maximizes between-pathologists' reproducibility for clinical immunohistochemistry-based biomarkers. , 2017, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[14]  P. Morbini,et al.  PD-L1 Testing and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Multicenter Study on the Diagnostic Reproducibility of Different Protocols , 2021, Cancers.

[15]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Implementation of Digital Pathology Offers Clinical and Operational Increase in Efficiency and Cost Savings. , 2019, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[16]  N. Rajpoot,et al.  Digital pathology and artificial intelligence will be key to supporting clinical and academic cellular pathology through COVID-19 and future crises: the PathLAKE consortium perspective , 2020, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[17]  Anagha P. Jadhav,et al.  A Multi-Institutional Study to Evaluate Automated Whole Slide Scoring of Immunohistochemistry for Assessment of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2019, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[18]  E. Bloemena,et al.  Comparison of three PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) , 2020, Modern Pathology.