Scale-free networks with invariable diameter and density feature: Counterexamples.

Here, we propose a class of scale-free networks G(t;m) with intriguing properties, which cannot be simultaneously held by all the theoretical models with power-law degree distribution in the existing literature, including the following: (i) average degrees 〈k〉 of all the generated networks are no longer constant in the limit of large graph size, implying that they are not sparse but dense; (ii) power-law parameters γ of these networks are precisely calculated equal to 2; and (iii) their diameters D are all invariant in the growth process of models. While our models have deterministic structure with clustering coefficients equivalent to zero, we might be able to obtain various candidates with nonzero clustering coefficients based on original networks using reasonable approaches, for instance, randomly adding new edges under the premise of keeping the three important properties above unchanged. In addition, we study the trapping problem on networks G(t;m) and then obtain a closed-form solution to mean hitting time 〈H〉_{t}. As opposed to other previous models, our results show an unexpected phenomenon that the analytic value for 〈H〉_{t} is approximately close to the logarithm of the vertex number of networks G(t;m). From the theoretical point of view, these networked models considered here can be thought of as counterexamples for most of the published models obeying power-law distribution in current study.

[1]  S. Redner,et al.  Structural Transitions in Densifying Networks. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[2]  Ping Wang,et al.  Generating Fibonacci-model as evolution of networks with vertex-velocity and time-memory , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[3]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[4]  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Eigenvector Localization in Real Networks and Its Implications for Epidemic Spreading , 2018, ArXiv.

[5]  S. Havlin,et al.  Scale-free networks are ultrasmall. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[6]  Gábor Orosz,et al.  Synchronization in networks with heterogeneous coupling delays. , 2018, Physical review. E.

[7]  J. Kurths,et al.  Complex network approaches to nonlinear time series analysis , 2019, Physics Reports.

[8]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[9]  M E J Newman Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[10]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Dense Power-law Networks and Simplicial Complexes , 2018, Physical review. E.

[11]  Thilo Gross,et al.  All scale-free networks are sparse. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[12]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Hierarchical organization in complex networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  H. Touchette,et al.  Large deviations of random walks on random graphs. , 2018, Physical review. E.

[14]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[15]  Maryam Zamani,et al.  Stability of glassy hierarchical networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[16]  Albert-Laszlo Barabasi,et al.  Deterministic scale-free networks , 2001 .

[17]  Shuigeng Zhou,et al.  Trapping in scale-free networks with hierarchical organization of modularity. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Marko Bajec,et al.  Self-similar scaling of density in complex real-world networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[19]  J. A. Bondy,et al.  Graph Theory , 2008, Graduate Texts in Mathematics.

[20]  Panpan Zhang,et al.  Characterizing several properties of high-dimensional random Apollonian networks , 2019, J. Complex Networks.

[21]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  Widespread occurrence of the inverse square distribution in social sciences and taxonomy. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.