Voluntary Task Switching Patterns in Everyday Tasks of Different Motivational Levels

In everyday settings people frequently perform multiple tasks within brief periods of time, typically called multi-tasking, task switching or task interleaving. Experimental studies of these effects typically involve an external cue or interruption to signal that the participant must switch. In contrast, in real world task interleaving the person doing the task frequently initiates the switch (e.g., Czerwinski, Horvitz, & Wilhite, 2004). Why an individual decides to make a voluntary task switch is largely an unexplored topic; the present study was designed to investigate motivational factors in switching tasks. Participants were allowed to switch freely between three tasks of different levels of interest and frustration – playing a game, searching letter for the letter “e” in nonsense text, and reading about human factors psychology. After the session, they rated the tasks on scales of interest and frustration. The results suggest that the level of frustration produced by the task is a stronger motivator for switching tasks than is interest in the task.

[1]  N. Meiran,et al.  Is there a general task switching ability? , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[2]  G. Ward,et al.  Task-Switching Costs, Stroop-Costs, and Executive Control: A Correlational Study , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  W. G. Smith,et al.  Angry Birds , 1888, Nature.

[4]  Catherine M Arrington,et al.  The Cost of a Voluntary Task Switch , 2004, Psychological science.

[5]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[6]  Hansjörg Neth,et al.  Discretionary task interleaving: heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  A. Miyake,et al.  The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Relation of task switching to speed, age, and fluid intelligence. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[9]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  A diary study of task switching and interruptions , 2004, CHI.

[11]  B. Williams Choice behavior in a discrete-trial concurrent VI-VR: A test of maximizing theories of matching , 1985 .

[12]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  Deciding when to switch tasks in time-critical multitasking , 2005, Cognitive Systems Research.

[14]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  W Vaughan,et al.  Melioration, matching, and maximization. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  Marie P. Panepinto Voluntary versus Forced Task Switching , 2010 .