Risk stratification after myocardial infarction using signal-averaged electrocardiographic criteria adjusted for sex, age, and myocardial infarction location.

BACKGROUND The objectives were to investigate the factors influencing signal-averaged ECGs (SAECGs) recorded in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) and to develop criteria for predicting arrhythmic events (AEs) that account for these factors. METHODS AND RESULTS SAECGs were recorded 5 to 15 days after MI in 2461 patients without bundle-branch block. The duration (QRSd), terminal potential (VRMS), and terminal duration (LAS) of the filtered QRS were measured. During follow-up (17 +/- 8 months), AEs (arrhythmic death; ventricular tachycardia, VT; ventricular fibrillation, VF) occurred in 80 patients (3.3%). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that QRSd discriminated patients with all types of AEs, but VRMS and LAS discriminated only VT patients; QRSd minus LAS also discriminated AE patients. Sex, age, and MI location significantly affected the SAECG; survivors without VT or VF were divided into subgroups (2 sex x 4 age x 2 MI), and QRSd values exceeding the 70th percentile in each subgroup predicted AEs with a sensitivity of 65.4%. An unadjusted QRSd criterion showed the same overall sensitivity and specificity but with less uniform values for each subgroup. A Cox model was constructed by use of multiple prognostic indicators, and in rank order, QRSd, previous MI, and Killip class were predictive of AEs. CONCLUSIONS SAECG adjustments for sex, age, and MI location did not improve sensitivity and specificity but produced a more uniform predictive performance. The proposed criteria are based only on QRSd, because late potentials (VRMS and LAS) did not discriminate patients with sudden death. Duration of high-level activity during QRS (QRSd-LAS) can predict AEs, suggesting that the arrhythmogenic substate involves a large mass of myocardium.

[1]  G. Lamas,et al.  Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. , 1993, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[2]  J. Rouleau,et al.  Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s--their risk factors, stratification and survival in Canada: the Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Study. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Predicting arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction using the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Camm,et al.  Frequency versus time domain analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiograms. III. Stratification of postinfarction patients for arrhythmic events. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  D L Ross,et al.  Prognostic significance of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation induced at programmed stimulation and delayed potentials detected on the signal-averaged electrocardiograms of survivors of acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, Circulation.

[6]  A. Adgey,et al.  Value of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, Holter monitoring and clinical variables for prediction of arrhythmic events in survivors of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Cooper,et al.  Differences between patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation as assessed by signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiac mapping. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  G. Klein,et al.  Electrophysiologic substrate associated with pacing-induced heart failure in dogs: potential value of programmed stimulation in predicting sudden death. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  S. Cessie,et al.  Dispersion of ventricular repolarization and arrhythmic cardiac death in coronary artery disease. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  A. Zaman,et al.  Late potentials and ventricular enlargement after myocardial infarction. A new role for high-resolution electrocardiography? , 1993, Circulation.

[11]  G. R. Williams,et al.  Effect of acute ventricular dilatation on fibrillation thresholds in the isolated rabbit heart. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[12]  R. Pedretti,et al.  Prediction of late arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction from combined use of noninvasive prognostic variables and inducibility of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  A. Camm,et al.  Differences between predictive characteristics of signal-averaged electrocardiographic variables for postinfarction sudden death and ventricular tachycardia. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  B. Jugdutt,et al.  Effect of captopril and enalapril on left ventricular geometry, function and collagen during healing after anterior and inferior myocardial infarction in a dog model. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Kienzle,et al.  Signal‐Averaged ECG Parameters in Cardiac Normals Using Frank Lead System and Fourier Transform Filter and Gender Specific Differences: A Multicenter Study , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  P. Ursell,et al.  Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. , 1985, Circulation.

[17]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  The dilemma of sensitivity versus specificity in computer-interpreted acute myocardial infarction. , 1992, Journal of electrocardiology.

[18]  S L Winters,et al.  The prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction and ventricular premature beats: a prospective study. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  S. Sangiorgio,et al.  Prognostic Significance and Evolution of Late Ventricular Potentials in the First Year After Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Study , 1989, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[20]  A. Camm,et al.  Effect of thrombolytic therapy on the predictive value of signal-averaged electrocardiography after acute myocardial infarction. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  C. Brilla The cardiac structure‐function relationship and the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system in hypertension and heart failure , 1994, Current opinion in cardiology.

[22]  K. Byth,et al.  What Is the Best Predictor of Spontaneous Ventricular Tachycardia and Sudden Death After Myocardial Infarction? , 1991, Circulation.

[23]  A. Camm,et al.  Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  G. R. Williams,et al.  Interaction of hypokalemia and ventricular dilatation in isolated rabbit hearts. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Experimental Observations and Clinical Implications , 1990, Circulation.

[26]  T. Denton,et al.  Comprehensive electrocardiology : theory and practice in health and disease , 1990 .

[27]  M. Simson Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[28]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[29]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Electrophysiologic variables characterizing the induction of ventricular tachycardia versus ventricular fibrillation after myocardial infarction: relation between ventricular late potentials and coupling intervals for the induction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  P. Savard,et al.  Performance degradation of the coherent averaging technique by a molding effect , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  P. Denes,et al.  Definition of the best prediction criteria of the time domain signal-averaged electrocardiogram for serious arryhthmic events in the postinfarction period , 1995 .

[32]  A. Greenspon,et al.  The effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. , 1993, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[33]  A. Camm,et al.  Age-related normal values of signal-averaged electrocardiographic variables after acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  W. Rogers,et al.  Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  V Hombach,et al.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  H. Blackburn,et al.  The aging electrocardiogram. A common aging process or latent coronary artery disease? , 1967, The American journal of cardiology.

[37]  P. Savard,et al.  Spatial domain analysis of late ventricular potentials. Intraoperative and thoracic correlations. , 1990, Circulation research.

[38]  A. Keren,et al.  Signal-averaged electrocardiographic late potentials in patients with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia: correlation with clinical arrhythmia and electrophysiologic study. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  E. Caref,et al.  Prognostic significance of the signal-averaged ECG depends on the time of recording in the postinfarction period. , 1989, American heart journal.

[40]  M. Allessie,et al.  Interaction of acute ventricular dilatation and d-sotalol during sustained reentrant ventricular tachycardia around a fixed obstacle. , 1994, Circulation.

[41]  O. Kjellgren,et al.  Current usefulness of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1993, Current problems in cardiology.

[42]  J. Bigger,et al.  Importance of the endpoint of noise reduction in analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[43]  H. Greene,et al.  Signal-averaged electrocardiographic late potentials in resuscitated survivors of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[44]  A. Raineri,et al.  Quantitative analysis of ventricular late potentials in healthy subjects. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[45]  P. Brugada,et al.  Time course and prognostic significance of serial signal-averaged electrocardiograms after a first acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[46]  In Anterior Myocardial Infarction, Frequency Domain is Better than Time Domain Analysis of the Signal‐Averaged ECG for Identifying Patients at Risk for Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.