Ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiography signal-averaging: a current perspective.

Signal-averaging is an emerging new application of the ambulatory ECG. Whereas real-time signal-averaging of the high-resolution ECG has led to the measurement of abnormal QRS complex parameters and to the detection of ventricular late potentials in patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation at increased risk of an arrhythmic event, similar measurements can also be derived from ambulatory ECG tape recordings. This review describes the technical differences between real-time and ambulatory high-resolution ECG signal-averaging, and the early clinical studies that correlated measured QRS complex parameters and defined the agreement of late potential detection with the two technologies. Although there appears to be a promising cost-effective benefit from ambulatory ECG signal-averaging, limitations imposed by the technical differences must be recognized, and additional investigation is needed to define the appropriate clinical use and criteria for best diagnostic and prognostic value.

[1]  A. Murray,et al.  Delayed ventricular depolarization--correlation with ventricular activation and relevance to ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. , 1984, European heart journal.

[2]  A. John,et al.  Signal‐averaged electrocardiography: History, techniques, and clinical applications , 1991, Clinical cardiology.

[3]  E. Berbari,et al.  Changes in Late Potential Measurements as a Function of Decreasing Bandwidth , 1991 .

[4]  M Fukunami,et al.  Detection of Patients at Risk for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation During Sinus Rhythm by P Wave‐Triggered Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiogram , 1991, Circulation.

[5]  M J Evanich,et al.  Some limitations on the removal of periodic noise by averaging. , 1972, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography. A statement by a Task Force Committee between the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. , 1991, European heart journal.

[7]  E. Caref,et al.  The signal-averaged electrocardiogram and late potentials. A comparative analysis of commercial devices. , 1989, Journal of electrocardiology.

[8]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical significance of ventricular late potentials. , 1986, European heart journal.

[9]  V Hombach,et al.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiography and myocardial ischemia. , 1989, American heart journal.

[11]  V. Rasmussen,et al.  Value of a bipolar modified inferior lead in detection of inferior myocardial ischaemia. , 1988, British heart journal.

[12]  S L Winters,et al.  A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  M. Simson.  Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[14]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Continuous Local Electrical Activity: A Mechanism of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia , 1978, Circulation.

[15]  S. Abboud,et al.  Late potentials recording with a precordial signal‐averaged electrocardiogram in 53 consecutive patients with a first acute myocardial infarction: Incidence and early natural history , 1990, Clinical cardiology.

[16]  N. El-Sherif,et al.  Correlation between the signal-averaged electrocardiogram from Holter tapes and from real-time recordings. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  S. Briançon,et al.  Factors determining the occurrence of late potentials on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram after a first myocardial infarction: a multivariate analysis. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Effect of conduction defects on the signal-averaged electrocardiographic determination of late potentials. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  N. Sammel,et al.  Late potentials detected after myocardial infarction: natural history and prognostic significance. , 1986, Circulation.

[20]  N. El-Sherif,et al.  Study of the influence of left bundle branch block on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. , 1991, American heart journal.

[21]  P Lander,et al.  Signal-averaged electrocardiography directly from Holter monitor tapes. , 1989, Journal of electrocardiology.

[22]  M. D. De Buyzere,et al.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia by 12-lead electrocardiography and Frank vector system during coronary angioplasty: value of a new orthogonal lead system for quantitative ST segment monitoring. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  J. Bigger,et al.  Importance of the endpoint of noise reduction in analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  J. Boineau,et al.  Slow Ventricular Activation in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Source of Re‐entrant Premature Ventricular Contractions , 1973, Circulation.

[25]  S. Abboud,et al.  Effect of thrombolysis on the evolution of late potentials within 10 days of infarction. , 1990, British heart journal.