HIV RNA and CD4 cell count response to protease inhibitor therapy in an urban AIDS clinic: response to both initial and salvage therapy.

OBJECTIVE To determine the HIV RNA and CD4 cell response to both initial and salvage therapy with protease inhibitor-based therapy, and to examine the relationship between the virological response and pre-therapy characteristics. DESIGN Observational cohort. SETTING University-based public hospital AIDS clinic. PATIENTS HIV-infected adults who received at least 16 continuous weeks' therapy with a potent protease inhibitor (indinavir, ritonavir or nelfinavir)-based regimen, and who have had at least 48 weeks of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Plasma HIV RNA and CD4 cell count response at week 48 of therapy for patients receiving their first protease inhibitor-containing regimen, and at week 24 of therapy with a salvage regimen. RESULTS Of the 337 patients analysed, 170 (50.2%) had a successful outcome (HIV RNA <500 copies/ml after 48 weeks of treatment). Independent predictors of virological failure were higher baseline HIV RNA level, lower baseline CD4 cell count and failure to initiate at least one new nucleoside analog simultaneously at the time protease inhibitor therapy was initiated. The risk of failure increased incrementally across most HIV RNA and CD4 cell strata, with significant increases as the HIV RNA increased above 4.5 log10 copies/ml and the CD4 cell count fell below 100 cells/mm3 (P< or =0.01). The CD4 cell count remained above baseline to week 48 in most patients, regardless of the HIV RNA response. Of the 99 patients who experienced virological failure and switched to a salvage regimen, only 22 (22%) achieved an undetectable HIV RNA level 24 weeks after initiating salvage therapy. Independent predictors of failure with salvage therapy included an HIV RNA greater than 4.0 log10 RNA copies/ml at the time of the switch and failure to use a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) in the salvage regimen. CONCLUSION Failure of potent protease inhibitor therapy to suppress HIV RNA levels below detectable levels is common in clinical practice, and can often be explained by their suboptimal use. CD4 T cell counts remain above baseline for at least one year in most patients experiencing virological failure. Successful salvage therapy, which was uncommon, was associated with a low plasma HIV RNA at the time of the switch and the use of a new class of antiretroviral agents (NNRTI) in the salvage regimen.

[1]  D. Richman,et al.  Simultaneous vs sequential initiation of therapy with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine for HIV-1 infection: 100-week follow-up. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  David A. Cooper,et al.  A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors , 1998, AIDS.

[3]  G. Satten,et al.  Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Craig,et al.  Resistance and cross-resistance with saquinavir and other HIV protease inhibitors: theory and practice. , 1998, AIDS.

[5]  Morris Schambelan,et al.  “Buffalo hump” in men with HIV-1 infection , 1998, The Lancet.

[6]  K. Miller,et al.  Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associated with use of indinavir , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  Amalio Telenti,et al.  CD4-cell count in HIV-1-infected individuals remaining viraemic with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) , 1998, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Rockstroh,et al.  Reply: Virological treatment failure of protease inhibitor therapy in an unselected cohort of HIV-infected patients. , 1997, AIDS.

[9]  S. Hammer,et al.  Use of changes in plasma levels of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA to assess the clinical benefit of antiretroviral therapy. , 1998, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[10]  P. Massip,et al.  Impact of protease inhibitors on AIDS‐defining events and hospitalizations in 10 French AIDS reference centres , 1997, AIDS.

[11]  M A Fischl,et al.  A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Douglas D. Richman,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1996 : Recommendations of an international panel , 1996 .

[13]  S. Hammer,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1996. Recommendations of an international panel. International AIDS Society-USA. , 1996, JAMA.

[14]  T. Merigan,et al.  Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection with saquinavir, zidovudine, and zalcitabine. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Schooley,et al.  Antiretroviral Therapy for Adult HIV-lnfected Patients: Recommendations From a State-of-the-Art Conference , 1993 .

[16]  K. Holmes,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for adult HIV-infected patients. Recommendations from a state-of-the-art conference. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases State-of-the-Art Panel on Anti-Retroviral Therapy for Adult HIV-Infected Patients. , 1993, JAMA.

[17]  R H Brook,et al.  Efficacy, effectiveness, variations, and quality. Boundary-crossing research. , 1985, Medical care.