Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized studies

Food labels are considered a crucial component of strategies tackling unhealthy diets and obesity. This study aims at assessing the effectiveness of food labelling in increasing the selection of healthier products and in reducing calorie intake. In addition, this study compares the relative effectiveness of traffic light schemes, Guideline Daily Amount and other food labelling schemes. A comprehensive set of databases were searched to identify randomized studies. Studies reporting homogeneous outcomes were pooled together and analysed through meta‐analyses. Publication bias was evaluated with a funnel plot. Food labelling would increase the amount of people selecting a healthier food product by about 17.95% (confidence interval: +11.24% to +24.66%). Food labelling would also decrease calorie intake/choice by about 3.59% (confidence interval: −8.90% to +1.72%), but results are not statistically significant. Traffic light schemes are marginally more effective in increasing the selection of healthier options. Other food labels and Guideline Daily Amount follow. The available evidence did not allow studying the effects of single labelling schemes on calorie intake/choice. Findings of this study suggest that nutrition labelling may be an effective approach to empowering consumers in choosing healthier products. Interpretive labels, as traffic light labels, may be more effective.

[1]  F. Sassi,et al.  Preventing Obesity in the USA: Impact on Health Service Utilization and Costs , 2015, PharmacoEconomics.

[2]  Anthony J Viera,et al.  Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[3]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[4]  T. Marteau,et al.  The impact of nutritional labels and socioeconomic status on energy intake. An experimental field study , 2014, Appetite.

[5]  R. Uauy,et al.  Structural responses to the obesity and non‐communicable diseases epidemic: the Chilean Law of Food Labeling and Advertising , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[6]  K. Brownell,et al.  Facts up front versus traffic light food labels: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  J. Fraser,et al.  Food labels: a critical assessment. , 2014, Nutrition.

[8]  G. Brunello,et al.  The Rise in Obesity Across the Atlantic: An Economic Perspective , 2008 .

[9]  D. Istance.  Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1966, Nature.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  J. Volatier,et al.  The French OQALI survey on dairy products: comparison of nutrient contents and other nutrition information on labels among types of brands. , 2012, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[12]  Joanna E Cohen,et al.  Front-of-pack symbols are not a reliable indicator of products with healthier nutrient profiles , 2015, Appetite.

[13]  E. Vartiainen,et al.  Awareness and use of the Heart Symbol by Finnish consumers , 2011, Public Health Nutrition.

[14]  S. Hercberg,et al.  Consumer acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutrition labels. , 2013, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[15]  L. Vartanian,et al.  Can serving-size labels reduce the portion-size effect? A pilot study. , 2015, Eating behaviors.

[16]  Lynn Stockley,et al.  Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review , 2005, Public Health Nutrition.

[17]  M. L’Abbé,et al.  Consumer attitudes and understanding of cholesterol-lowering claims on food: randomize mock-package experiments with plant sterol and oat fibre claims , 2014, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[18]  Munir Pirmohamed,et al.  Dabigatran etexilate versus warfarin in management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in UK context: quantitative benefit-harm and economic analyses , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Bernard Ruffieux,et al.  Expérimentation d’un fléchage nutritionnel dans deux supermarchés à Marseille « Le choix Vita+ » , 2013 .

[20]  Joachim Westenhoefer,et al.  Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study , 2009, BMC public health.

[21]  C. Shore-Lorenti,et al.  Effects of Combined Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation on Insulin Secretion, Insulin Sensitivity and β-Cell Function in Multi-Ethnic Vitamin D-Deficient Adults at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  E. Riboli,et al.  Behavioral and dietary risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R. An.  Beverage Consumption in Relation to Discretionary Food Intake and Diet Quality among US Adults, 2003 to 2012. , 2016, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[24]  Trenton G. Smith.  Obesity and the Economics of Prevention: Fit Not Fat , 2012 .

[25]  Dan J. Graham,et al.  Nutrition label use partially mediates the relationship between attitude toward healthy eating and overall dietary quality among college students. , 2012, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[26]  C. Forestell,et al.  The effect of brand names on flavor perception and consumption in restrained and unrestrained eaters , 2013 .

[27]  Ross A. Hammond,et al.  Smart food policies for obesity prevention , 2015, The Lancet.

[28]  K. Brownell,et al.  The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition label. Influence on perceptions and intake of cereal , 2012, Appetite.

[29]  B. Popkin,et al.  Ultra‐processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[30]  B. Kelly,et al.  Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers’ responses to seven labelling formats , 2014, Appetite.

[31]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice , 2013, Appetite.

[32]  T. Marteau,et al.  Making food labels social: The impact of colour of nutritional labels and injunctive norms on perceptions and choice of snack foods☆ , 2015, Appetite.

[33]  R. Hanning,et al.  The impact of adding front-of-package sodium content labels to grocery products: an experimental study , 2012, Public Health Nutrition.

[34]  David Hammond,et al.  Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review , 2011, Public Health Nutrition.

[35]  C. Forestell,et al.  The effect of brand and caloric information on flavor perception and food consumption in restrained and unrestrained eaters , 2014, Appetite.

[36]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[37]  Michele Cecchini,et al.  Tackling of unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, and obesity: health effects and cost-effectiveness , 2010, The Lancet.

[38]  S. Hercberg,et al.  Association of Perception of Front-of-Pack Labels with Dietary, Lifestyle and Health Characteristics , 2014, PloS one.

[39]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments , 2014 .