The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Johnston,et al. Redefining Science: The Impact of Complexity on Theory Development in Social and Behavioral Research , 2019, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[2] Thomas Schäfer,et al. The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases , 2019, Front. Psychol..
[3] A. Gelman,et al. Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research , 2017, The American Statistician.
[4] Reginald B. Adams,et al. Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting , 2018 .
[5] Hristos Doucouliagos,et al. What Meta-Analyses Reveal About the Replicability of Psychological Research , 2018, Psychological bulletin.
[6] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.
[7] Leif D. Nelson,et al. Psychology's Renaissance , 2018, Annual review of psychology.
[8] Andrew Gelman. Don't characterize replications as successes or failures. , 2018, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[9] Alistair J. Wilson,et al. Assessing the Rate of Replication in Economics , 2017 .
[10] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. Meta-assessment of bias in science , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] Andrew Gelman,et al. Measurement error and the replication crisis , 2017, Science.
[12] J. Ioannidis,et al. When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment , 2016, bioRxiv.
[13] Arturo Casadevall,et al. Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide , 2016, mBio.
[14] Duane T. Wegener,et al. Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results , 2016 .
[15] J. Leek,et al. What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[16] Jay J Van Bavel,et al. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] Gideon Nave,et al. Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics , 2016, Science.
[18] J. Vandekerckhove,et al. A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology , 2016, PloS one.
[19] M. Eronen,et al. Heating up the measurement debate: What psychologists can learn from the history of physics , 2016 .
[20] K. Fiedler,et al. Questionable Research Practices Revisited , 2016 .
[21] Andreas Ritter,et al. Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .
[22] Shannon M. Moore,et al. Why a Confirmation Strategy Dominates Psychological Science , 2015, PloS one.
[23] D. Simonton. Psychology as a Science within Comte's Hypothesized Hierarchy: Empirical Investigations and Conceptual Implications , 2015 .
[24] Michael C. Frank,et al. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.
[25] D. Trafimow,et al. Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[26] Angela L. Duckworth,et al. Measurement Matters , 2015, Educational researcher.
[27] Michael A. Clemens,et al. The Meaning of Failed Replications: A Review and Proposal , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[28] S. Maxwell,et al. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? , 2015, The American psychologist.
[29] Simine Vazire,et al. The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power , 2014, PloS one.
[30] Neil Malhotra,et al. Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer , 2014, Science.
[31] Jeffrey R. Spence,et al. Expectations for Replications , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[32] C. Sansone,et al. Improving the Dependability of Research in Personality and Social Psychology , 2014, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[33] W. Stroebe,et al. The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[34] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences , 2013, PloS one.
[35] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology † , 2013 .
[36] Gregory Francis,et al. The Psychology of Replication and Replication in Psychology , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[37] C. Ferguson,et al. A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[38] H. Pashler,et al. Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[39] Axel Cleeremans,et al. Low Hopes, High Expectations , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[40] George Sugihara,et al. Detecting Causality in Complex Ecosystems , 2012, Science.
[41] Lena C. Zuchowski,et al. Disentangling Complexity from Randomness and Chaos , 2012, Entropy.
[42] S. Fiedler,et al. Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research? , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.
[43] K. Fiedler. Voodoo Correlations Are Everywhere—Not Only in Neuroscience , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[44] Daniele Fanelli,et al. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries , 2011, Scientometrics.
[45] Dustin B. Thoman,et al. Inference Patterns in Theoretical Social Psychology: Looking Back as We Move Forward , 2010 .
[46] D. Fanelli. “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences , 2010, PloS one.
[47] Sandra D. Mitchell. Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy , 2009 .
[48] C. Ferguson. Is Psychological Research Really as Good as Medical Research? Effect Size Comparisons between Psychology and Medicine , 2009 .
[49] Andrea M Hussong,et al. Integrative data analysis: the simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. , 2009, Psychological methods.
[50] Robert Rosenthal,et al. Artifacts in Behavioral Research , 2009 .
[51] Steven D. Levitt,et al. Was There Really a Hawthorne Effect at the Hawthorne Plant? An Analysis of the Original Illumination Experiments , 2009 .
[52] Mark A. Bedau,et al. Emergence : contemporary readings in philosophy and science , 2008 .
[53] F. Mazzocchi. Complexity in biology , 2008, EMBO reports.
[54] J. Platt. Strong Inference , 2007 .
[55] Rowland H. Davis,et al. Strong Inference: rationale or inspiration? , 2006, Perspectives in biology and medicine.
[56] James Jaccard,et al. Arbitrary metrics in psychology. , 2006, The American psychologist.
[57] L. Finkelstein,et al. Problems of measurement in soft systems , 2005 .
[58] J. Ioannidis. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.
[59] S. Posavac,et al. Information Search in the Testing of Quantified Hypotheses: How “All,” “Most,” “Some,” “Few,” and “None” Hypotheses Are Tested , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[60] In praise of soft science , 2005, Nature.
[61] M. V. Regenmortel,et al. Reductionism and complexity in molecular biology , 2004, HIV/AIDS: Immunochemistry, Reductionism and Vaccine Design.
[62] S. Maxwell. The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies. , 2004, Psychological methods.
[63] Dean Keith Simonton,et al. Psychology's Status as a Scientific Discipline: Its Empirical Placement within an Implicit Hierarchy of the Sciences , 2004 .
[64] Marc H V Van Regenmortel,et al. Reductionism and complexity in molecular biology. Scientists now have the tools to unravel biological and overcome the limitations of reductionism. , 2004, EMBO reports.
[65] D. Borsboom,et al. The concept of validity. , 2004, Psychological review.
[66] M. Grace. A logical point of view , 2003, British Dental Journal.
[67] Kathleen D. Vohs,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST DOES HIGH SELF-ESTEEM CAUSE BETTER PERFORMANCE, INTERPERSONAL SUCCESS, HAPPINESS, OR HEALTHIER LIFESTYLES? , 2022 .
[68] J. Hemphill,et al. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. , 2003, The American psychologist.
[69] John Stuart Mill,et al. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte , 2002 .
[70] James Ladyman,et al. Understanding Philosophy of Science , 2001 .
[71] J. Buchanan,et al. THE WEAKNESSES OF STRONG INFERENCE , 2001 .
[72] Lisa A. Best,et al. Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: , 2000 .
[73] J. Michell. Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept. , 1999 .
[74] Gerd Gigerenzer. We need statistical thinking, not statistical rituals , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[75] J. Michell. Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology , 1997 .
[76] Orley Ashenfelter,et al. Theory and measurement , 1996 .
[77] Sean A. Spence,et al. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .
[78] Jacob Cohen. The earth is round (p < .05) , 1994 .
[79] Stephen Cole,et al. Why sociology doesn't make progress like the natural sciences , 1994 .
[80] Anthony S. Bryk,et al. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .
[81] N. Pidgeon,et al. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. , 1992, British journal of psychology.
[82] S. Schachter,et al. Speech Disfluency and the Structure of Knowledge , 1991 .
[83] J. Z. Shapiro,et al. Are Retrenchment Decisions Rational? The Role of Information in Times of Budgetary Stress. , 1990 .
[84] M. F. Fox. Fraud, ethics, and the disciplinary contexts of science and scholarship , 1990 .
[85] E. A. Locke,et al. A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .
[86] R. P. McDonald,et al. Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .
[87] Gary James Jason,et al. The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .
[88] C. Granger. Causality, cointegration, and control , 1988 .
[89] Larry V. Hedges,et al. How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. , 1987 .
[90] J. Klayman,et al. Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .
[91] R E Kuttner,et al. Fraud in science. , 1985, Science.
[92] K. Stanovich. How to think straight about psychology , 1985 .
[93] William S. Cleveland,et al. Graphs in Scientific Publications , 1984 .
[94] Stephen Cole,et al. The Hierarchy of the Sciences? , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.
[95] B. Fischhoff,et al. Hypothesis Evaluation from a Bayesian Perspective. , 1983 .
[96] Edward G. Carmines,et al. Measurement in the Social Sciences: The Link Between Theory and Data , 1980, American Political Science Review.
[97] R. Howell,et al. Measurement in the social sciences , 1980 .
[98] R. Rosenthal. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .
[99] R. Wylie,et al. Theory and research on selected topics , 1979 .
[100] P. Meehl. Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. , 1978 .
[101] Imre Lakatos,et al. The methodology of scientific research programmes: Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes , 1978 .
[102] G. Marwell,et al. Self-esteem : its conceptualization and measurement , 1976 .
[103] N. Humphrey. The Social Function of Intellect , 1976 .
[104] L. Cronbach. Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .
[105] D. Rubin. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .
[106] K. Gergen. Social Psychology as History , 1973 .
[107] D. Haslam,et al. Psychology of Suffering , 1968, Nature.
[108] N. Storer. The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations. , 1967, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.
[109] J. Platt. Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.
[110] M. Orne. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .
[111] Jacob Cohen,et al. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.
[112] L. Cronbach. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .
[113] Otto R. Spies,et al. The aim and structure of physical theory , 1954 .
[114] Mercer Jennifer Ann,et al. PUBLICATION manual of the American Psychological Association. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.
[115] E. B. Wilson. Social Science , 1940, Nature.