Differential imaging in heterogeneous media: limitations of linearization assumptions in optical tomography

Image reconstruction and data collection in optical tomography can be achieved in a number of different ways. This paper explores the limitations of using assumptions of linearity, particularly in the case where image data is acquired before and after a change in optical properties within an object with heterogeneous optical properties. The effects of using a 2 dimensional (2D) reconstruction scheme for changes in 3D measurements are also demonstrated. Problems are a direct result of the inherent non-linearity of optical tomographic image reconstruction. We show how these assumptions affect images of changes in absorption in the presence of a) heterogeneous background scatter, and b) heterogeneous background absorption using both simulations and time-resolved experimental data. Comparisons of results using non-linear and linear image reconstruction techniques are included throughout. The origin and dependence of the error are investigated. Methods to improve results by using estimates of background structure from baseline images are shown to improve quantitation and object localization in simple images. The potential significance of this error is discussed in relation to successful, reliable clinical imaging of the neonatal brain.

[1]  S R Arridge,et al.  Time resolved optical tomography of the human forearm. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  James G. Fujimoto,et al.  Advances in Optical Imaging and Photon Migration , 1996 .

[3]  Harry L. Graber,et al.  Near-infrared absorption imaging of dense scattering media by steady-state diffusion tomography , 1993, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[4]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Calibration techniques and datatype extraction for time-resolved optical tomography , 2000 .

[5]  C. Burch,et al.  Localization of absorbers in scattering media by use of frequency-domain measurements of time-dependent photon migration. , 1994, Applied optics.

[6]  R. Arridget,et al.  The theoretical basis for the determination of optical pathlengths in tissue: temporal and frequency analysis , 1992 .

[7]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Near-infrared imaging: photon measurement density functions , 1995, Photonics West.

[8]  D. Delpy,et al.  A 32-channel time-resolved instrument for medical optical tomography , 2000 .

[9]  M. Schweiger,et al.  Image reconstruction in optical tomography. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  D. Delpy,et al.  An improved design for a stable and reproducible phantom material for use in near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  M. Schweiger,et al.  Photon-measurement density functions. Part 2: Finite-element-method calculations. , 1995, Applied optics.

[13]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[14]  I Basarab-Horwath,et al.  Incorporating a priori anatomical information into image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography , 1999, Physiological measurement.

[15]  David A. Boas,et al.  A model-based calibration method for diffuse optical tomography , 2000 .

[16]  S. Arridge Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .

[17]  S. Arridge Photon-measurement density functions. Part I: Analytical forms. , 1995, Applied optics.